@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo u can call it central if you want but take comfort in knowing ur the ONLY one. ik ur mad abt it but ur personal opinion doesnt shape anything. its eastern bc of joint history and influence. central by placement. EVERYONE prefers eastern. sorry bud idk what to say ig u lost😭
@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo i get ur point but it doesnt work like that😭 it might be by area, but the term is categorised by joint history. not placement. that is simply how it is no changing that. its like ur arguing abt smth so pointless. who cares what it is called? end of the day its eastern
@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo altough i finally get ur logic but its just wrong. it is more clear to distinguish areas based on events that happened “recently” 30 yrs ago was not long ago in history😭😭 thats why its eastern europe, categorized by the joint effect of soviet influence. more sense than area
@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo like its just a way to categorize europe, it really isnt that deep. using logic by putting the same countries who were under soviet rule and are VISIBLY recovering. thus eastern. not that deep
@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo i genuinely dont understand your logic😭😭 sure, the countries have a long history and will continue on, but its not “damned”, simply ww2 and soviet rule was the LAST MAJOR event that SHAPED the countries into what they r today.
@AtotheLein@hovormijurko@bizzlerxo genuinely what r u talking abt? the influence of the last 100 years currently and actively show today. former russian controlled countries r less developed (like mine) and visibly still under soviet lasting effect. history influenced the russian occupation -> influenced today