This is actually incredible! The Globe and Mail admitting to its total failure in covering the "unmarked grave" mass hysteria — an event that changed Canada, possibly irreparably.
"The fact of the crimes committed against Indigenous children at residential schools over many decades does not automatically validate claims that hundreds of students were dumped into unmarked graves in Kamloops and other residential schools. That is an extraordinary assertion, one that requires proof.
…The media, including The Globe and Mail, did not initially scrutinize, much less challenge, that assertion. The initial headlines and stories in the media simply stated as fact that the remains of 215 children had been found.
Perhaps it will be proven, some day, that there are hundreds of unmarked graves at Kamloops. But it was not proven to be true in May, 2021. It is not proven to be true today.
…The lesson of 2021 should be: assertions about residential schools should be listened to carefully, and then, just as carefully, held up to scrutiny.”
Now do the scandal of paediatric gender medicine, @globeandmail. You have been just as gullible and your reporting has been just as atrocious.
Assertions about "gender-affirming care" should also be held up to scrutiny.
You frequently report that this treatment is life-saving, when there is no evidence that is true.
You call puberty blockers fully reversible, when there is clear evidence that is false.
You blindly accept the existence of "trans kids" without questioning where this sudden explosion of young people "born in the wrong body" came from.
You appeal to the authority of medical associations, including the thoroughly discredited WPATH, and dismally fail to investigate the astonishing levels of fraud, corruption, and institutional capture.
🚨 CBC Buried Footage🚨
Forgotten segment from Rick Mercer on CBC calling out government spying on Canadians?
I wonder where that energy is now for Bill C-22?
Don't we need CBC like this? What happened?
🤷♂️
I’m going to say it again: the Canadian Anti-Hate Network was modelled after and funded by the Southern Poverty Law Centre.
I mused at the time (2021) that they were manufacturing a “hate crisis” which would then allow them to advise the government on censorship policies.
https://t.co/SipCJiGu64
There’s a certain idea that you hear a lot from the Canadian media that basically any random ass undemocratic thing that happens in Canadian politics is perfectly fine because that’s just “our system” and you should shut up and accept it. The voter should be understood to have zero influence over anything of actual consequence in terms of who runs this country, while the politicians should get to do whatever they want. Because that’s “our system.”
I feel like a lot of this stuff has a very gaslighting quality to it. When people make these blunt “our system” arguments they’re basically telling Canadians to not trust their own instincts of right and wrong or just or unjust. They’re told “this is just the way things are done here and if you complain you’re an ignorant simpleton.”
These arguments are ALWAYS made in the direction of giving more power to politicians and less power to voters. I’m getting sick of it.
While preparing for a brief on the independence petition due tomorrow, I came across this from the Supreme Court of Canada that is worth sharing:
“The right of the people to discuss and debate ideas forms the very foundation of democracy… For this reason, the Supreme Court of Canada has assiduously protected the right of each citizen to participate in political debate...
Permitting an effective voice for unpopular and minority views — views political parties may not embrace — is essential to deliberative democracy. The goal should be to bring the views of all citizens into the political arena for consideration, be they accepted or rejected at the end of the day. Free speech in the public square may not be curtailed merely because one might find the message unappetizing or the messenger distasteful…
The ability to engage in effective speech in the public square means nothing if it does not include the ability to attempt to persuade one’s fellow citizens through debate and discussion. This is the kernel from which reasoned political discourse emerges.
Freedom of expression must allow a citizen to give voice to her vision for her community and nation, to advocate change through the art of persuasion in the hope of improving her life and indeed the larger social, political and economic landscape…
Freedom of expression protects not only the individual who speaks the message, but also the recipient. Members of the public — as viewers, listeners and readers — have a right to information on public governance, absent which they cannot cast an informed vote.”
These are words from the Supreme Court of Canada that recognize the importance of debate and discussion, even when the views are unpopular, uncomfortable, or distasteful.
So when someone tries to shut down the conversation, shame you, or tell you certain topics should not even be discussed, remind them of that.
The answer is not silence or suppression.
A petition, a debate, even a controversial idea, these are not failures of the system. They are expressions of it.
The real risk is when we start deciding which views are acceptable to be heard.
Because once that line starts moving, it does not stop where you think it will.
So the question is:
Are we prepared to actually live this principle or do we only support it when we agree with the message?
Because the more you know and understand, the more effectively you can participate, ask better questions, and actually effect change.
The commissions now serve as an ideological inquisition with an unlimited remit to regulate the whole of society and destroy the livelihood of anyone violating the false dogmas they have designated as sacred. It must be dismantled utterly.
The BC Human Rights Tribunal ruling: you need to understand what is actually being argued in paragraph 19.
Most people will focus on the headline and the money.
The more important issue is the logic. It appears to collapse the distinction between recognizing a person and affirming a contested theory of sex and gender.
https://t.co/RZEgK2P7lN
Since Canada is back in the news with a Tranѕ ѕhooting, here is an article written by Prime Minister Mark Carney's non-binary 'child', Sasha Carney, celebrating how the definition of 'Leѕbianiѕm' has changed.
“It’s drilled into our heads, for better or for worse, that lesbianism is associated with puѕѕy.”
Antifa sh*t talked the PSL by trying to limit their revolutionary violence for optics reasons in their after action report here.
https://t.co/i0K0QnrD27
These types of things are worth reading because it shows how the left communicates with each other in a decentralized manner
Here's some more info on how ANTIFA views Vanguard Parties and Movements.
Also included are some rants against the PSL and it's front groups The People's Forum and The Answer Coalition, for supporting genocides by pro-CCP Marxist regimes:
Former MPP Joel Harden was present during at least one violent incident and did not intervene. He stood by and concealed himself behind a flag while Tanner Massey assaulted me and my videographer using a Fox 40 electronic whistle.
Fox 40 electronic whistles emit approximately 100–120 decibels at close range and are capable of causing permanent hearing damage.
Today, Deana Sherif was found guilty by a jury of assault with a weapon for her use of a Fox 40 electronic whistle.
#Ottawa #ProtestMania
Support independent coverage exposing Canada’s Antifa movement:
https://t.co/2aUkWjbON2
to know if she follows more socialists. She certainly doesn't follow as many as Fiona does, but I want to know. We wouldn't/shouldn't tolerate Con MPPs having any ties to genuine fascists, we should not tolerate the continued subversion of the LPC by those who are not liberals.
Why's frmr NDP Doly following these people? Specifically Fiona who's a coordinator for Revolutionary Communist Party (of Canada). It's possible she's the type of Progressive that flirts with Socialism while pursing reformism, not revolution, but I can't see more of her follows
1/
For years, Doly Begum has fought for the people of Scarborough Southwest as their MPP.
As our Liberal candidate in the upcoming federal by-election, she’s ready to bring their priorities to Ottawa and build a stronger future for her community, and all Canadians.
In addition to abolishing the 'Gender Binary', Queer Marxism seeks to abolish the 'Hetero/Homo Binary' as well.
Gendered Seхualitieѕ (Straight, Gaγ, Lеѕbian, and Biѕeхual) are problematic because they are based on Gender/Gеnitalia.
These two men are seen as 'Assimilating to Straightness'.
You've heard them say it: "You're obsessed with Genitals!". This is where it comes from.
In another book that is part of a series that is edited by former American Library Association president Emily Drabinsky, ρornograρhy is included, as is an essay that ties 'raρe kits' to private property ownership and capitalist production.
Note the ρedoρhilic quote from Sigmund Freud as well: