Astronomer and compassionate seeker into the essential nature of things, where the farther I seem to get the more there is simply Being Displaying Experiencing
I've been cycling between Meditation in the Clear
https://t.co/WhUOU2nq3c and The Yay of Seeing Clear https://t.co/WEO5H3V6Nb which provides basis for the meditation. Once you begin with one, the other shows up as an option at the end. Cycling through them builds on the effect.
In consideration of this I now think Arjuna's experiencing of hypothetically the totality of momentary experiencing actually says nothing at all about the actually unlimited potential for experiencing. This suggests a self modeling consciousness coupled with an aspect of physical
Arjuna's reply "Take it away" to the experiencing of "What God experiences", given that Being is the experiencing of what is appearing in Display, implies that what we cannot be aware of cannot be experienced at all. SO Can we remote view unlimitedly as sole acts of experiencing?
Arjuna's reply "Take it away" to the experiencing of "What God experiences", given that Being is the experiencing of what is appearing in Display, implies that what we cannot be aware of cannot be experienced at all. SO Can we remote view unlimitedly as sole acts of experiencing?
And of course all of this suggests quite strongly that my long held notion that dreams represent intermediate state experiencing is not the case at all. One thing remains certain, whatever the source of the information it is presented to awareness in Display, which persists.
So when I asked the question just now I was informed that dreams and waking state activity involve mostly the same areas of the brain. It suggested you could improve sports performance by dreaming about it, which is the reverse direction of causality that i'm attempting. Sigh
Interesting that nearly everyone dreams, but only one in five or so experience NDEs, and some of those are just blank views. this strongly points to dreams as being brain-based. why then can't i coax the dreams to cooperate with waking state intentions? Different parts of brain?
Persisting in resisting meditation, it is with considerable resignation that I am coming to conclude that becoming familiar with Clear in meditation could facilitate experiencing it in dream, so I will try working with it for a while. Let me know if your get there first! Yay!!
OMG It's finally become obvious that since he doesn't read and his intelligence briefing is blow-em-up videos and EVERYONE around him is afraid to tell it as it is, WE know infinitely more about the situation across its entire spectrum than he does, knowing effectively none of it
Continuing to not connect with display nature in dream in any realized way at all. Not even specifically noticing the clear space at all, even tho it presents very openly as if setting it up for placing attention on it, a fact noticed in waking state recall of the dream.
Always Yay in the Clear of Display... Talk about being in the IN clique.. tiny close knit group but open clearly to all who can figure it out. In your face if you're in the right place. LOL.. OMG I Love it Yay Bless
OMG!! That has got to stick and You absolutely know how much that means to me to hear those words coming from you resonating in both compassion and knowing, transmitting back what i have been yearning to convey all these years. Be there for me when i come back to fill me again :)
From having no head (Yay) to having a meatball instead, that is indeed the aging scenario I am discovering for myself too OMG right on with that observation. And Spirit is not happy with my paucity of sanctuary immersion for it, so pay attention jim, your 35yo is not the meatball
@JimWray To quote him: βwhatever I do from the illusion that there is a Douglas meatball here doing it, is rather badly done. And whatever I do from the experience that here is not Douglas' meatball, but Space for the whole world to happen in, is better done. There's more energy & love.β
It comes back to me now that i had read his "On Having No Head" oh so many years ago. So right on with respect to filling headspace with the clear of display. I mentioned your tweet and my unknowing to Claude (Sonnet 4.6) and it briefed me delightfully too! Yay, my Friend
@JimWray To quote him: βwhatever I do from the illusion that there is a Douglas meatball here doing it, is rather badly done. And whatever I do from the experience that here is not Douglas' meatball, but Space for the whole world to happen in, is better done. There's more energy & love.β
@PaulNHughes 'Im not getting the connection... The meatball may have aged too much. Point is I may be in it but I'm not it, that's for sure! Yay!! But please clue me just a bit more, my friend, how does the meatball relate to Being? Are we referring to meatball as the human side
I'm pretty sure that knowing self as Being has a major time dependence on the scale of a lifetime. What young lovely or handsome face staring back in the morning mirror would care to even dream of being something other that what you see there? Ans: Some old face like mine! WooHoo
This is a message that resonates with folks who programmed Commodore-64s in Basic at age 50. Hello, Hello... ?? Hmm.. no response.. Are you there?? Alone surfing the sea of my own peculiar understanding.. What's not to enjoy about it, save for the aloneness of it.. Hello ..??
Knowing Display, our visual field may be defined as "The Display of Appearance of objects in the space imaged on the retina of the eye." For present science it's "That portion of space in which objects are visible ..." Science is yet to address the "Display of Appearances".