It's more than 1000 years. We see records to show continues inhabitation of Kannadigas atleast in Krishnagiri dist from 1500+ yrs
Below is Veeragal in Krishnagiri town belonging to 7th century (600-700 CE) which is in Kannada language belong to period of Shivamara of W.Gangas.
I often see Maratha anons posting such AI-slop but, seriously, what do they aim to accomplish by this?
Do they even realise that this only exposes their cheap mentality in front of others? Imagine using AI to fantasize about another community’s women because history & reality haven’t given you any actual reason to feel superior.
Though we can’t really blame them, as these are the values passed down from one generation to the other amongst ‘kuleen’ Maratha families. Anyone who has read history knows well the barbarity with which Maratha raiders treated women — irrespective of caste or religion — in the territories they raided. Some of the most celebrated Maratha heroes (you know who) were notorious as serial rapists.
Clearly, technology has advanced, but their sick mindset hasn’t ….
I gone through 450+ inscriptions transcripts in last few years-clearly highlight Seunas of devagiri are pure kannada origin, kannadigas, They hold Pure Kannada names, Titles-ಕರ್ಣಾಟರಾಯವಂಶಾಭಿರಾಮಂ: (The pride/beauty of the Karnāṭa royal lineage)Share and Repost💛❤️ Follow for More
@ThatOndiGuy@MrLeoX10918 The title kongani of gangas is corrupt Form konkani varma which means konkan (western)coast conqueror and it is not related to Kongu region
Your claim relies on an outdated mistranslation! Historians R. Narasimhachar and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri rejected the treachery theory, and even J. F. Fleet later accepted their correction. Butuga II killed Rajaditya in battle, not through betrayal. Stop spreading lies
...Butugam Rājādityanaṁ bisugeye kallan-āgi surig-igidu kondu...
(Atakur Inscriptions)
bisugeye - when embracing
kallan agi - Like a thief
surig-igidu - pierced with a dagger
I think Kannadiga/kings were the only race who celebrated treachery/betrayal.
Your claim relies on an outdated mistranslation! Historians R. Narasimhachar and K. A. Nilakanta Sastri rejected the treachery theory, and even J. F. Fleet later accepted their correction. Butuga II killed Rajaditya in battle, not through betrayal. Stop spreading lies