Digital ID is coming to Canada.
Fight it. With everything you have. Including voting for politicians who take a strong, principled stance against it and vow to fight it.
@OfficiallyJustE@TWilsonOttawa Well, the media won't tell you his ethnicity or skin color, so that tells you one thing: "not white." Typically, when it's a white person, that fact is put front a center.
It's quite striking to consider, now during Black History Month, that Don Lemon was arrested for violating the Ku Klux Klan Act.
We've come a long way in race relations.
The one thing I've learned about Canada since the freedom convoy is that a mischief charge carries a harsher penalty than a charter of rights violation does.
@timreay@realEstateTrent Mine has been running flawlessly for nearly ten years. I've done nothing to it but replace toner cartridges. (It's a laser printer.)
If people come to live in Britain, they should accept they will live under English or Scottish law
They must not be allowed to import their own legal systems
If they want Sharia law there are over 60 countries which can provide it for them
“Mine is the first visit of a Canadian Prime Minister to China in nearly a decade.
The world has changed much since that last visit.
And I believe the progress that we have made and the partnership sets us up well for the
New…
World…
Order.”
——
You know who the last Prime Minister was to visit China?
Globalist Commie pig Justin Trudeau.
I said it before. Many times. And I will say it again. Many times.
Canada has made itself a national security threat to the United States.
BC Cattleman's Association President, Werner Stump, wrote an exceptional op-ed:
"The potential consequence of this ruling (UNDRIP) is to make BC non-governable. Effectively all decisions about BC laws are to be made in consultation and in cooperation with over 200 First Nation Governments.
The Province and the First Nations will form a collective government that the people of BC do not elect. First Nations leaders have a responsibility to their members only, and so they should. Your vote may no longer matter as BC is at risk of becoming a non-democratic society." #bcpoli @BCcattle@bcagcouncil
"[Alberta's] independence ... would require mutual access agreements, where leverage runs both ways. Canada currently allows BC to block Alberta while Alberta has no reciprocal authority. That asymmetry disappears under independence."
Ray, the mistake is assuming this is a geography problem. It isn’t. It’s a governance failure.
Canada was founded on a core constitutional principle: no province can block another province’s access to markets. That is precisely why interprovincial pipelines, railways, and ports fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction. The federal government’s job is to ensure goods and resources move freely across provinces.
What we are seeing today is the opposite. The federal government has repeatedly stated that BC and certain First Nations effectively have veto power over Alberta’s resources transiting BC. That position directly contradicts the Constitution and a foundational principle of Confederation. Canada, in this respect, is no longer functioning as designed.
Ironically, this is why the “landlocked Alberta” argument fails. Under a properly functioning Canada, Alberta is not landlocked at all. Ottawa is simply refusing to exercise the authority it already has.
And here’s the part critics ignore: an independent Alberta would actually have leverage Canada refuses to use. Roughly $17 billion in BC exports move eastward through Alberta by rail, and highway. Alberta would control that transit as a sovereign state—just as other inland countries do through transit agreements.
Independence wouldn’t eliminate trade routes; it would require mutual access agreements, where leverage runs both ways. Canada currently allows BC to block Alberta while Alberta has no reciprocal authority. That asymmetry disappears under independence.
The real question isn’t whether Alberta is “landlocked.” It’s why the federal government is failing to enforce the Constitution—and why Albertans are expected to accept permanent economic obstruction with no leverage at all.
@hookskat Your objection presupposes the world operates apart from God, that x happening is not God doing it. But he calls the Assyrian king a club in his hand.