It was supposed to be spelled out by the Constitution what the federal government gets to control and what the states get to control. Then through creative interpretation of the Constitution, the federal government took more and more power. Now it's kind of unclear and mostly whatever the Supreme Court decided at any given time.
The left, whether at the state or federal level, tends to get its way more often.
Another thing of note, regarding foreign affairs, is it's always the federal government that gets to decide. The federal government was supposed to decide foreign affairs and settle conflicts between states, and states were supposed to be in control of most domestic affairs, but now the federal government has taken a lot of that domestic affairs power for themselves.
@TRobinsonNewEra I'd be curious to know what would happen to him if he went back illegally, and tried to claim asylum. Would they deport him? Where would they deport him to?
🚨Top Democrat political consultant and campaign strategist, James Carville, just stated on the Left-wing ‘Policon’ podcast that when the Democrats regain power, they plan to:
-Grant statehood to Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, so that the Democrats can unlock 4 extra seats in the Senate.
-Pack the U.S. Supreme Court from 9 Justices up to 13 Justices, adding another 4 Left-wing Justices to the court.
-Reopen the U.S.-Mexico border and grant mass-amnesty to every single alien currently inside of the United States.
-His advice to Democrat politicians: “Don’t run on it. Don’t talk about it. Just do it.”
“Noncitizens don’t vote,” they told us
And then @AAGDhillon started reviewing voter rolls
After examining only about a third of all voter-registration files, she’s found tens of thousands of noncitizens registered to vote
There are many more
We need the SAVE America Act
@DmitriyLeybel@AkkadSecretary If the same regulation existed now as in 1938, there would be cheap houses and cars available for those who wanted them, and there would be people who wanted them. If you can't see that obvious fact, then I guess we'll just have to disagree.
@DmitriyLeybel@AkkadSecretary Why do you think people are complaining now if they don't want the option for inexpensive cars and houses? Many people would want an inexpensive way to live, but it's been denied them.
@DmitriyLeybel@AkkadSecretary It's not really a dumb comparison. The point is people could live inexpensively in the past, but now it costs much more. It's not like we've lost the ability to make cheap houses and cars. We could do it even better. So why aren't these things available anymore?
Maybe someone should make temporary floating shielding for ships wanting to pass through. Kind of like a ship to contain the more valuable ships, and that won't be a big loss if destroyed. Two materials that come to mind for these ship shields would be pykrete or foamcrete.
Pykrete is ice and sawdust. It was developed in WWII for Project Habakkuk, a British plan for a massive unsinkable aircraft carrier intended to counter U-boats in the Atlantic. Someone should make a giant "U"-shaped pykrete shield for ships.
Another thing it could be made with is foamcrete or maybe foamcrete with additives like paper pulp and rebar. It could be modular like existing floating concrete breakwaters. They could be giant rectangles or squares with metal rings on the outside, allowing them to be chained or roped together at will. Any that are damaged can be replaced as needed. To save material, it can be made hollow, filled with plastic floats and seawater or sand so they can be made to the density needed to make them as low in the water as the ships they are protecting so that they will set off any mines before the ship. If seawater is used, then density can even be adjusted for the specific ship being protected by pumping seawater in or out. There could also be a way to attach a ceiling to the "U" for additional protection, maybe made out of metal netting or bars.
Another simpler idea would be to have an old unwanted ship going in front to trigger any mines that might be there. As for funding for these ideas, Maybe they could be rented out or funded by those concerned about the cost of oil and fertilizer.
Who remembers?
Never forget that over 33 years ago we learned the government will k*ll your dog, shoot your 14 year old son in the back and snipe your wife in the doorway while she holds your infant child.
Imagine being 14 years old, living off the grid in the Idaho woods in 1992.
You’re walking your dog when suddenly he growls and *bang*, the dog is shot and killed.
You look up and see a man in a Ghillie suit with a rifle pointed at you.
Fear grips you.
You pull your gun and fire.
You’re just defending yourself.
This is your home.
You run back toward your parents, only to be sh*t in the back and k*lled before you can reach them.
You never understand what went wrong or why.
The next day, a sniper fires again.
Your mother, standing in the doorway holding your baby sister, is hit in the head and k*lled instantly.
All of this started because your father Randy Weaver, sold two sawed-off shotguns to an undercover agent and refused to become a government informant.
They gave him a false court date and set up armed surveillance at your home, waiting for the moment they could escalate.
Randy Weaver was a former U.S. Army Green Beret.
He served in the military before moving off the grid with his family in northern Idaho.
His military background added to the tension for federal authorities, because he was trained in weapons and survival, but it didn’t make him violent or a threat to anyone outside his property.
After an 11 day stand off with Randy and the baby inside with two dead bodies, the government was ordered to pay millions in settlements to Randy.
They were proven to be in the wrong for this deadly power trip.
But that doesn’t bring back a 14 year old boy or his mother.
Stay educated.
Some of our history isnt taught in school for a reason.
Hollywood resident says crime and response to crime is so out of control in Los Angeles, she’s caught people peeping through her window and she doesn’t even bother to call the police anymore
That’s not all
- At 3AM a man was torturing a cat in her bushes
- A man just pulled a gun on a firm right next to her
- Someone lit her house on fire and the fire department didn’t even take a report
- Sexual assault attempts
- A burglary attempt, her back gate was broken into and the bathroom window screen was removed
- A woman stood naked in front of her house, smoking meth, and threatened people
- A homeless man through a huge amount of poop at her car
- A “crazy dude” with a weapon who talks to himself circled her block with a two-by-four, smashing cars. Neighbors pointed him out to police, but officers said they “can’t do anything” because it was a “victimless crime”
Theft from vehicles, including smash-and-grabs, dominate property crime reports, with tens of thousands of incidents annually in Los Angeles alone
The crime rate in Downtown Los Angeles reached 255.8 per 1,000 residents, roughly 743% higher than the citywide average
They’re really doing it, California Democrats are criminalizing citizen journalism
California Rep Carl DeMaio says Democrats are forcing through their “Stop Nick Shirley Act” and “The Privacy Committee was denied their opportunity to a fair vetting of the bill”
He says he created a motion to block the bill and Democrats vetoed it
“Outrageous. I just made a motion in the Assembly to block the Mia Bonta bill — The Stop the Nick Shirley Act — The reason why we are asking it to be re-referred to the privacy committee is that the author of this bill misrepresented contents of the bill, lied to committee members that would basically ban Nick Shirley from posting videos exposing fraud in California.
— I just gave the state Assembly members the chance to strike the bill from the record, which basically would kill the bill.
Democrats in the State Assembly voted to keep and protect her bill and advance it on”
How has the federal government not stepped in and investigated California Democrats and everyone involved
WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump
They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump
Literally Treason
“So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable”
“Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else”
“How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations”
Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment
And not a single person has been held accountable for this
We have all heard about the Armenian genocide.
But what I did not know until recently is that most Armenians were Christian. And that other Christians were massacred alongside them:
"During the Ottoman genocide of Christians from 1914–1924, Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, and other Christian communities were targeted in coordinated campaigns of violence.
Villages were erased. Families were driven into death marches.
Ancient cultures—rooted for thousands of years—were shattered.
Over 3.5 million Christians were killed through massacres, starvation, forced deportations, and exile."
There has never once been a civilization at any point in history that died from an aging population because it’s a problem that inevitably corrects itself. The population may wax and wane over the centuries, but low birth rates alone have never killed off a civilization.
Meanwhile, countless civilizations have been completely destroyed from unchecked immigration. And they were destroyed because everything you just articulated is actually the inverse of how civilizations form in the first place.
It’s particular peoples that produce particular civilizations. If you mass import a different particular group, then the civilization that original people produced dies.
If you need proof, you can ask the Romans.