🇨🇦 MARK CARNEY SAYS CANADA IS “THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD TO BE A REGULAR PERSON.”
Wonderful. Let’s meet this mythical regular Canadian.
Not a billionaire. Not a trust-fund beneficiary. Not someone with three investment properties.
Just an ordinary Ontario taxpayer earning $120,000 a year, trying to raise a family, own a modest home, and perhaps commit the outrageous act of saving for retirement.
In Ottawa, $120,000 sounds like prosperity.
In the real world, it’s a remarkable opportunity for everyone else to get paid.
Let’s follow the money.
YOUR $120,000 SALARY — 2026
🇨🇦 Federal income tax: ~$17,502
🇨🇦 Ontario income tax, including surtax: ~$8,636
🇨🇦 Ontario Health Premium: $750
🇨🇦 CPP contributions: ~$4,646
🇨🇦 Employment Insurance: ~$1,123
TOTAL PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS: $32,657.
Congratulations. Before you’ve bought a loaf of bread, paid your mortgage, or turned on a light, roughly 27% of your gross income has already been deducted.
You now have approximately $87,343 left.
And this is where the Canadian dream gets really expensive.
Own a home? Property taxes.
Buy taxable goods or services? Another 13% HST in Ontario.
Fill your car? Federal and provincial fuel taxes are already embedded in the price.
Insure your car? Pay the premium.
Insure your home? Another premium.
Heat your house? Pay the utility company.
Need child care? Open your wallet.
Need groceries? Statistics Canada says grocery prices have risen 33% since September 2020.
And remember, insurance, food inflation, and child care aren’t taxes. They’re simply the other bills arriving after the tax collector has finished.
Now consider one illustrative annual budget for that $120,000 Ontario household:
🏠 Mortgage payments: $33,600
🏡 Property taxes: $5,300
🥦 Groceries: $13,000
👶 Child care: $10,800
🚗 Auto and home insurance: $5,000
⚡ Utilities, internet and phones: $6,000
⛽ Transportation, fuel and maintenance: $7,200
🛒 Clothing, household supplies and other essentials: $6,000
TOTAL HOUSEHOLD EXPENSES: $86,900.
These are illustrative costs, not national averages, and applicable sales taxes are included rather than added twice.
AMOUNT LEFT FROM $120,000 GROSS INCOME: $443 A YEAR.
That’s approximately $37 a month.
Before a vacation.
Before a major home repair.
Before an emergency.
Before meaningfully contributing to your child’s education or your own retirement.
Now imagine what happens to the family earning $70,000.
Or the single parent working two jobs.
Or the young couple who cannot afford the down payment on the home their parents bought with one income.
And then imagine being lectured by the Prime Minister about how extraordinary life is for ordinary Canadians.
Here’s the intellectual dishonesty in modern Canadian politics:
Governments love measuring prosperity by how much people earn. Families measure it by how much they can keep, afford and save.
Those are two very different economic realities.
A six-figure salary used to signal financial security.
Today, in some Canadian households, it merely qualifies you to participate in a more expensive version of financial insecurity.
And yes, taxes fund hospitals, schools, infrastructure and pensions. Canadians understand that.
What they’re entitled to ask is whether the price they’re paying is producing the quality of life they’re being promised.
Because a country cannot indefinitely celebrate its standard of living while ordinary people struggle to maintain it.
The government gets the first deduction. The bank gets the mortgage payment. The insurer gets its premium. The grocery store gets what’s left.
And the Prime Minister gets to give a speech about how lucky you are.
Perhaps Canada really is the greatest country in the world to be a regular person.
Patriotism is loving your country. Accountability is demanding that your country work for the people who pay taxes
🇨🇦 @wealthmoose
Video : @MarkJCarney
Canada should not get into bed with Ursula von der Leyen.
She was never elected by a single voter. She was nominated by heads of government and confirmed behind closed doors in Brussels. You can't vote her out. Neither can anyone in Europe. That alone should end the conversation, but it gets worse.
This is the woman who negotiated billions in vaccine contracts with Pfizer's CEO by text message, then refused to show the texts. The EU's own court ruled against her. Billions in public money, decided in private chats, hidden from the public. And she survived it. She always survives it.
She survived a no-confidence vote. She survived the German defence ministry scandals, the missing data, the consultant contracts. She survives everything because the system she runs isn't built to hold her accountable. It's built to protect her.
Now look at what she's selling us. Digital ID wallets for every citizen. Officially voluntary today. But once that infrastructure exists, governments always find new uses for it. That's not a conspiracy, that's just how power works. And "ever closer association" means Canada falls in line behind EU rules on digital ID, data, and AI. Rules we didn't write. Rules our Parliament doesn't control.
Carney calls this "more sovereignty." Let's be honest about what it is. It's trading dependence on Washington for dependence on Brussels. That's not sovereignty. That's changing landlords.
And here's the part nobody in Ottawa wants to say out loud: there is no vote. No referendum. No say for the Canadian people. The federal cabinet can sign this and ratify it on its own. The same people who lecture us about democracy are cutting a deal with an unelected leader, in a city most Canadians will never visit, about rules that will govern our daily lives.
Europe's farmers already figured her out. They drove their tractors into Brussels because her green rules were strangling them. Her own member states grumble about how much power she's grabbed for herself. Even the people who work under her call her "Queen Ursula."
So why is Canada crawling into bed with her? Because Carney wants a headline about standing up to Trump, and Ursula wants another country in her orbit. Both of them get what they want. The Canadian people get the bill.
We don't need a new master. We need our own house in order.
Canada deserves better than Ursula's bed.
1774: they blew tobacco smoke up drowning victims' backsides to revive them, and the kits hung along the Thames like lifebuoys.
1863: they sold cocaine wine as a daily tonic, and a pope pinned a gold medal on it.
1898: they sold heroin as a cough medicine, and spooned it into coughing children.
1918: they sold radium water as a health drink, and the millionaire who drank 1,400 bottles was buried in a lead-lined coffin with most of his jaw gone.
1921: they put lead in petrol, and Britain kept it in the pumps until 2000.
1930s: they X-rayed children's feet in shoe shops, and kids queued to watch their toes wiggle on the screen.
1940s: they rubbed mercury teething powder into babies' gums, and about 1 in 500 of those babies was poisoned.
1946: they sold cigarettes on the line that more doctors smoked their brand, and put a man in a white coat on the advert.
1949: they gave the lobotomy a Nobel Prize, and doctors went in through the eye socket with an ice pick.
1952: they sold a cigarette filter made of asbestos as the greatest health protection in smoking history, and smokers drew it into their lungs with every puff.
1957: they sold thalidomide to pregnant women for morning sickness, and around 10,000 babies were born with missing or shortened limbs.
1960s: they sold margarine as the heart-healthy fat, and spread trans fat on a generation's toast.
1996: they sold OxyContin as barely addictive, and started an overdose epidemic.
1999: they sold Vioxx for sore joints, and pulled it five years later after tens of thousands of heart attacks.
2026: they're selling seed oil as the heart-healthy fat, and it's in almost every packet in your kitchen.
Every one of these came with an expert's blessing and the same total certainty.
The people telling you which fat to fear today sit in the same chairs as the ones who put radium in the water and a doctor on the cigarette packet, and they're every bit as sure.
"The experts recommend it" has the longest body count in medicine.
I am a Canadian, Russia is not my enemy.
But my Canadian government killed 16,500 with MAID last year.
My government locked us all down for 2 years.
My government injected a dangerous experimental drug into 85% of the people.
The government that threatens my life, liberty and well being is in Canada
If you have 8 minutes to spare watch this incredible testimony with receipts by Rodney Palmer who had a 20 year career as a foreign correspondent for CTV news and was an investigative reporter for CBC Radio & Television in Canada and abroad.
He lays down an incredible timeline of how CBC manipulated and propagandized against Canadians in order to coerce them to take the product.
@AllisonInquiry
Forgive and forget?
Never.
This is James Freeland testifying at the Allison Inquiry.
His mother died two days after the shot.
Neglected by the system. Ignored and covered up. Just a government casualty.
Joseph Stalin this often attributed with the saying “1 death is a tragedy. 1 million is a statistic”.
The Canadian government is no better than Stalin’s.
I also knew an elderly woman who died alone in a bathtub two days after the shot.
Very few of her friends/family even knew that she had gotten the job two days earlier to even connect those two dots.
There will be no justice for this on this earth.
So you have to pray for justice in another realm of the universe.
Any time do you want to pick up on these stories @CBC it’s right across the street from your offices. Literally.
Shawn Buckley said the quiet part out loud at the Allison Inquiry.
A doctor in Canada still cannot stand up and question the COVID shots without the college circling. Six months before the hearings they asked MP after MP to sit at a table and listen to the injured. The answer was no. Not medically impossible. Politically impossible.
Then the applications came in. Over 1,400 people willing to testify. Most of the country still does not know the inquiry exists.
That is not a small club of cranks. That is a pile of families who were told the product was safe, then told to be quiet when it was not.
Buckley is a lawyer. Dean Allison is an MP running a citizen hearing, not a royal commission. Nobody has to treat every application as proven injury. The part that sticks is simpler: they built a system where the injured had to organise their own room because Parliament would not lend them one.
If 1,400 people will put their name down to speak, the official count was never the whole story.
I’m supposed to perform the obligatory little ritual now and pretend both versions of this trade debacle deserve equal credibility.
I don’t... I believe the Americans.
Not because they’re American. Not because politicians suddenly became trustworthy. And certainly not because Donald Trump has been canonized.
I believe them because the American account increasingly makes more sense.
Greer, Lutnick and Bessent have spoken openly and specifically about what happened. Their accounts have been remarkably consistent. They can discuss the negotiations like people who were actually involved in them, without appearing terrified that an unsupervised adjective might escape and without a teleprompter.
Meanwhile, what do Canadians get from our own government?
Carefully sterilized language. Vague explanations. Missing specifics. Scripted talking points. Every sentence apparently passed through enough communications people and lawyers to remove any detectable trace of information.
We’re being kept in the dark like bloody mushrooms while learning more about Canada’s own trade negotiations from American officials and American media than from the Canadian government supposedly representing us.
And somehow we’re not supposed to notice how politically convenient the Canadian version is.
We got:
👉🏻 Trump was unreasonable.
👉🏻 Trump changed the deal.
👉🏻 Trump threatened our sovereignty.
👉🏻 Trump forced Canada to walk away.
Trump. Trump. Trump.
Just keep Canadians sufficiently pissed off at Donald Trump and perhaps nobody asks the considerably more inconvenient question:
❓️ What exactly did Mark Carney walk away from, and why?
Because after the Gordie Howe Bridge fiasco, I’m fresh out of complimentary benefit of the doubt.
And here’s the part that absolutely reeks, discrediting any appearance of truth told by the liar in chief #MarkCarney...
If Carney possesses documentary evidence proving Trump suddenly dumped outrageous, unacceptable demands onto Canada at the eleventh hour, where the hell is it?
Seriously.
Think about what that evidence would be worth politically.
IF Carney had a piece of paper proving Donald Trump screwed Canada, blindsided our negotiators and forced our heroic prime minister to stand up, pound the table and walk away, the Liberal machine wouldn’t quietly tuck that document into a filing cabinet.
Are you kidding me?
▪︎ They’d wallpaper Ottawa with the damn thing.
▪︎ They’d hold press conferences about it.
▪︎ They’d wave it around in Parliament.
▪︎ They’d quote it in fundraising emails.
▪︎ They’d buy ads with it.
Every friendly pundit in the country would have a laminated copy by breakfast. CBC would probably commission a twelve-part documentary and an interpretive dance.
It would be political rocket fuel.
Carney could point directly at the evidence and say, See? I stood up to Trump.
And considering how desperately this government wants Canadians angry at Trump, they would squeeze every last political drop out of it.
Instead, we get:
- Words.
- Trust us.
- Trump did it.
- Don't worry about the details.
- Just keep your elbows up and direct your anger toward the orange man south of the border.
How extraordinarily convenient.
And while Canada spends years shrieking about foreign interference, demanding security clearances for opposition leaders and warning us about other countries trying to influence Canadian politics, Canadian politicians seem remarkably comfortable inserting themselves into American partisan politics.
Apparently foreign political influence is a mortal threat to democracy when it crosses the border heading north.
Heading south?
Nothing to see here, carry on.
So enough of the carefully packaged Liberal bullshit.
Release the negotiating documents.
• Show Canadians the American demands.
• Show us Canada's demands.
• Show us what changed.
• Show us when it changed.
• Show us exactly what was sitting on that table when Canada walked away.
Because if those documents prove Carney's story, his government has every political incentive imaginable to release them, and its quite odd that they haven't.
Their continued absence doesn't prove he's lying, but it sure does suggest it!
And considering the Americans are providing details while our own government feeds us verbal oatmeal, it sure as hell gives Canadians a reason to stop swallowing everything we're spoon-fed.
Mark Carney isn't an oracle. He isn't our father. And Canadians aren't intellectually deficient children who need the PMO to decide which facts we're mature enough to see.
Stop telling us whom to hate.
Show us what happened.
Then we'll decide for ourselves who is full of shit.
#cdnpoli
Carney gives Ukraine billions of Canadians hard earned tax dollars because Canada and Ukraine share the exact same core principles, specifically highlighting democratic values, respect for sovereignty, and the rule of international law.
Who knew that arresting and executing civilians was now a core Canadian Democratic value?
https://t.co/EF7oeRjOOn
🚨Haha! 😂😂 --
Toronto man gives a "taxpayer's acknowledgement"
immediately after a woke Toronto councilor gives a "Land acknowledgement"
"lets reflect and remember that EVERY salary and lightbulb in this chamber is funded by us" 😂😂
Give him the ORDER OF CANADA!
🇨🇦 🚨#BREAKING: Moose On The Loose dug into Carney’s portfolio:
• 583 total holdings
• 🇨🇦 3 Canadian positions → ~0.5%
• 🇺🇸 530 U.S. positions → ~91%
So while Canadians get told that a 35% tariff will “protect jobs,”
91% of Carney’s own money is sitting comfortably in the 🇺🇸 U.S. market.
That’s not a conflict of interest.
That’s the operating model.
@cbcwatcher@MarketManiaCa@WhineNot@TheReclamare
#cdnpoli #cdnecon #Canada #Tariffs #FollowTheMoney #Trump #USA
At some point, it is worth asking why so many major Canadian news stories are broken in the foreign press, from the Trudeau blackface photos to details about the Tumbler Ridge tragedy. The CBC's entire justification for their taxpayer-funded existence is Canadian news, but they give us documentaries on drag shows while the foreign press lands scoops.
Show me one double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in actual infants or young kids that tests injected aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate—either as part of a single aluminum-containing vaccine *or* the full childhood schedule (real doses, real timing, multiple shots starting at two months)—against a control group that gets nothing but plain saline in the syringe.
Then they have to follow those kids for years and actually look at autism, ADHD, allergies, asthma, autoimmune disease, seizures, developmental delays, or any other serious long-term outcome.
That study doesn’t exist. You won’t find it. It’s literally never been done.
What the CDC, FDA, and WHO actually lean on when they say “aluminum in vaccines is safe” boils down to 2 things:
Flarend et al 1997: 4 adult rabbits injected once with radioactive aluminum, observed for 28 days to see where it goes. No toxicity testing, no long-term follow-up, no humans, no infants, and the study wasn’t even designed to look for health effects.
Mitkus et al 2011: A computer model built by an FDA toxicologist that takes the rabbit numbers from Flarend, plugs them into a spreadsheet, mixes in the dietary aluminum safety limit for adults (ingested, not injected), and concludes “the blood levels stay low.”
That’s it. That’s the entire “core evidence” people point to when they claim injecting babies with aluminum over and over again starting at 2 months is “proven safe.”
Everything else (big cohort studies, active-comparator trials, “70 years of use”, etc.) comes downstream from those 2 references or compares vaccinated kids to other vaccinated kids.
Vaccination is quite literally pseudoscientific, by definition. No empirical evidence for the vaccination claims.
Must watch! On the topic of polio and viruses. From Dr. Tom Cowan @drtomcowan - our vice president who has been a board member from our inception. See the entire interview: https://t.co/G51vlrPxsl. Please share!