Why is he not trending??
He’s a Ghanaian 🇬🇭 veteran telling the truth, he’s saying he doesn’t blame SA 🇿🇦 they started it as Ghanaians for the same reasons & many Nigerians died when it happened!
Why there’s so much noise when South Africans are doing it???
As a South African
How do U find yourself supporting this criminality in our country
People over staying without Visa
Operation of Businesses without Business Visas
Drugs dealing happening in our communities
Children dying from poisonous from Spaza shops
Yet we must be quiet!
@Adikastakes Carbo Verde is smaller than Ikeja (a metro within Lagos).
Lagos state has 22m+ inhabitants but then 2m of them are all over the world, trafficking!
If the government had listened to the Deputy Minister of Police in 2007 and taken decisive action against illegal immigrants, we wouldn't be here today.
In 2026, we are pretending to be shocked by this crisis 😳😳🙆♂️
The public controversy surrounding Ghanaian 🇬🇭 businessman Ibrahim Mahama’s pledge of 100 jobs for citizens evacuated from South Africa 🇿🇦 continues to ignite intense political and ethical debates.
While the government celebrates the initiative as a model partnership with the Association of Ghana Industries, critics see a darker narrative. Because Ibrahim Mahama is the brother of President John Mahama, the job offer from his company, Engineers & Planners, has amplified deep-seated allegations of nepotism and state capture.
Opponents argue that the Mahama administration is using regulatory shifts, particularly in the gold mining sector, to enrich family-linked corporations under the guise of philanthropy. Tying these jobs to the controversial transfer of mining concessions like the Damang Mine from foreign firms has raised alarms about investor confidence.
Furthermore, everyday citizens question the equity of the intervention, asking why such urgent corporate lifelines are not equally extended to the millions of local youth battling systemic unemployment.
Ultimately, this saga transcends mere charity. It forces us to ask a critical question: when billionaire philanthropy is deeply intertwined with presidential power, does it serve the public good, or does it simply institutionalise cronyism?
A deeply disappointing interview, replete with misinformation.
First, the claim that two Nigerians have been killed during the current wave of attacks remains entirely unsubstantiated by available information.
No Nigerian National
has been killed during the current waves of attacks in South Africa.
Second, it is untrue that five Mozambicans were killed. While there is an active South African Police Service investigation into the deaths of two Mozambican nationals, deaths we deeply regret, we trust that this matter will be thoroughly investigated, resulting in clear accountability and justice.
We once again convey our sincere condolences to the government and people of Mozambique.
We have cooperated fully with your High Commission to facilitate the necessary repatriation process.
It is therefore deeply strange that we are hearing for the first time, through this interview, that 15 Ghanaians are currently hospitalised. We have no information of that nature whatsoever. In fact, to date, the High Commissioner has not shared any information with us, not even regarding the single individual he previously discussed in media interviews.
Regarding what you have referred to as a “nuclear default” against South African companies: this will not be triggered by the recent attacks. The truth is, mere months into the new Ghanaian administration, the operating conditions for a number of South African companies had already been made untenable. I was compelled to write to you, my dear brother, alerting you to these challenges.
Be advised: I am prepared to publish that letter if its existence is denied.
Third, we reiterate the findings of our Department of Home Affairs and the Border Management Authority concerning the 27 May flight of 300 individuals. Of these, 25 came from the our deportation facility, transported by the Immigration Inspectorate of the Department of Home Affairs.
The remaining 275 were brought by the Ghanaian High Commissioner. Following an intensive check-in process, the travellers proceeded to BMA Immigration, where approximately 90% were found to be undocumented.
Consequently, the Ghanaian Embassy was required to issue them Emergency Travel Certificates, single-page, one-way documents permitting a traveller to return only to their country of origin. Furthermore, most of these travellers were found to have overstayed their visas by more than 30 days, with some overstaying by a year or more.
Let there be no misunderstanding: we will vigorously defend any frivolous or baseless lawsuit emanating from Ghana against South Africa.
Our initial hope was simply to assist the Government of Ghana in repatriating its citizens in a humane and cordial manner. However, we will not continue to tolerate this public spectacles, characterised by incomplete information and outright misinformation devoid of any diplomatic decorum.
Make no mistake: the South African government remains committed to regional integration.
We are, and will remain, open to discussing the push and pull factors relating to migration at a bilateral level, the African Union or any multilateral forum but Let us be factual in our engagements and not pander to unnecessary public spacteclaces that are devoid of any diplomatic decorum.
Having been on both ends of violence and hostility directed at migrants, Ghana has invaluable lessons to impart. We are ready to learn from your wealth of experience in this regard, including how Ghana has managed social tension while protecting, exclusively for Ghanaians, the very sectors in which Ghanaians in South Africa thrive.
As we have stated on numerous occassions, violence directed at migrants is an affront to our constitutional order. Our democracy is founded on the principle that none shall suffer discrimination on the basis of race, nationality, religion, gender or sexuality. As we navigate this complex and fluid situation, we are determined to uphold this promise.
A man with no working truck convinced Wall Street he had built the next Tesla. His company hit $30 BILLION. All he did was push it down a hill with no engine.
> Trevor Milton founded Nikola in 2014, named after the same inventor as Tesla.
> The goal was to build hydrogen powered trucks that would make diesel obsolete. He had no trucks.
> In 2018 he released a promotional video called Nikola One In Motion. It showed a sleek semi truck accelerating smoothly down an open highway.
Investors went wild.
> What nobody knew was that the truck had no engine, no fuel cell, and no propulsion system of any kind.
> Milton's team towed it to the top of a hill, tilted the camera to hide the slope, and let it roll.
> He spent the next four years doing the same thing with words. On podcasts, television and social media.
> Investors were told Nikola could produce its own hydrogen. It could not. They were told the trucks were ready for production. They were not. They were told orders were flooding in. They weren't.
> In June 2020 Nikola went public. Within days the company was worth $30 BILLION, more than Ford.
> Milton's personal stake hit $7.3 BILLION overnight.
> A $32.5 MILLION ranch in Utah followed. A record for the state at the time.
> In September 2020 Hindenburg Research published a report calling Nikola "an intricate fraud" built on "an ocean of lies." Milton resigned within ten days.
> A federal jury convicted him of securities fraud and wire fraud in 2022. Sentenced to four years in prison the following year.
> He never went. He was free on $100 MILLION bail pending appeal.
> He and his wife donated $3.2 MILLION to Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.
> In March 2025 Trump gave him a full pardon. The pardon erased $168 MILLION in restitution to defrauded shareholders.
> Nikola filed for bankruptcy the following month, leaving thousands of investors with nothing.
The company never had a product. The only thing that was real was the $30 BILLION valuation, the $7 BILLION that landed in his pocket and the pardon that made sure none of it had to be returned.
You backed, armed and funded Israel’s genocide. Vetoed every UN resolution to help Palestinians from our permanent Security Council seat. Launched two illegal wars of aggression against Iran, bombed a school of children, kidnapped the President of Venezuela, bombed ships in int’l waters deemed “narco terrorists”. And you’ve hosted a man - wanted for genocide and crimes against humanity - at least 7 times in this Admin alone.
You don’t believe in international law and have defunded as much of the UN and WHO as possible.
NOW you want the UN’s help? That’s fucking rich.
This is the part they don’t show you.
An openly anti-Zionist Jewish community.
Anti-Zionism is NOT Anti-Semitism!
Everyone should protest against Zionism, Zionism is not Judaism.
Being against Zionism does not make you an enemy of the Jews.