@tomas_salvo22 Who would have thought that engineering trades cause designs to converge into an optimal form. See pretty much all modern commercial airliners.
@AlexHollings52 I also think that because "dumb" ballistic missiles lack meaningful GNC authority, they shouldnt be categorized as hypersonic weapons. Modern mach 4+ glide vehicles and cruise missiles deserve the hypersonic distinction due to their ability to negate traditional SAM defenses.
@AlexHollings52 To your point though, I propose the implementation of something akin to the smart- prefix used on earlier gen munitions, when we went from free-fall bombs to strapping guidance packages Mk80 series bombs. I feel like we are repeating that era of weapons development... just faster
@AlexHollings52 Right! I feel like there is a lot of context that gets missed with using hypersonic as a catch-all term for things going mach 4+ because, like you mentioned, there is definitely a variety in capability. Also Imis-read that other comment and thought this was a velocity discussion.
#PLSR Minnesota Or The Moon: Pulsar Helium To Present Verified Helium-3 Discovery At Quantum Tech World 2026 (https://t.co/TQsGdqDHQ7)
As governments invest billions pursuing plans to extract helium-3 from the Moon, Pulsar is advancing a terrestrial source located in the #USA.
@stepango What is interesting to me is, which mode is the one driving? LLM? Diffusion? WFM? Obviously an LLM/diffusion model to communicate with us humans but internally whats solving the problem? I dont necessarily trust either LLM/Diffusion to grok a CFD/FEA problem with a good solution.
@stepango I agree. I think initially the use cases will be niche (robotics/automation) but beyond that, having a model trained on general physics/spacial reasoning with tuning for really specific problem sets would be revolutionary. Like solving complex fluid mechanics sims in real time.