Illegals, and I want to whisper that we need to ban trannies from the schools and this woman, the female candidate said all and this is verbatim, his exact words, and then they had a man who had who pushed Hillary's policies so you had a male actor saying all of Hillary's stuff and you had a female one. And then at the end of the debate they asked people, who would you vote for an election, the female Trump, the woman who was speaking Trump's policies won in a landslide with both men and women so What the reolam I playing here cause I want to hear from every f****** person on stage, the retarded woke leftists believe Trump keeps winning and winning and winning because his personality appealed to the working class, but it's just not true. It's just b******* He's a f****** creative study that I just said which every f****** person in the rink of Google proves that I'm done speaking. Thank you Smurf, always a pleasure and please visit us in uncle, Steve's room on the weekends, uncle, steve, by the way, just at 3 plug, uncle, steve hosts 2 great rooms on Saturdays, ask uncle steve from 7 AM to 10A Pacific standard, that's 10 AM to 1 PM Eastern and Sundays.Ask the atheist again AM to 10 AM Pacific 10 AM to 1 PM.Est, where I am to the best.I mean, the best weekend https://t.co/cHJ85KqOsz's amazing then please, if you don't go there regularly.Come at ted it's fantas
Is so unbelievably strong? It's really hard to even make those kinds of comparisons like I don't think the voters are not largely voting based on policy platforms. This idea that the voter is sitting down with 4 windows types open, comparing policy platforms and determining who to vote for based on that, this is just not the voters actually operate via the political science research on this is pretty clear that voters basically choose who they want to vote for and then they adopt the policy or post. Office. Which which seems crazy?But I could, I could give you this is like my area of medication, so I couldn't give specific examples but I don't, I don't want to bore people in the https://t.co/vX0Kv4d3BS just, you know, take my word for it.I don't think I think that these candidates that are running.We are in a populist era right https://t.co/XOzhuVVtAA populist, candidates have an advantage.If most people think that the establishment is not working for them.Almost by default, people are going to gravitate towards these kinds of candidates that are speaking up against the establishment that are saying, these people are crooked and corrupt.I mean , this is why trump did so well
Our point was, if there's more mom and so the DNC is cooked and I kind of want that to happen, I think and I think that there are going to be more Mondays. However, I question whether or not the Democratic Party is cooked, but I completely agree there's going to be more money, yeah, yeah, I mean you could disagree on the level of which they'd be screwed, but I'm saying that Kevin was saying, you know, if bondani ran nationally, he'd have different ways to appeal, but when it came when punch claims to shelve, he's still going to have to answer on the core issues that Americans care He handled those issues is different
I don't know I wouldn't have to see one, but if I if I could let me just give an example if I can imagine mom Donnie running on like, I'll just scale the policies up like doing a large build out of like us public transit of doing universal childcare, wanting to do. Something on health insurance, you know, some sort of public option or like large stale aca expansion, I do think you can win on this platform. Now, he's not running on seizing the means of production for Healthcare, with all due respect very quickly. Why don't we get realistic? He's not eligible to run for President. So how about if he's successful in mayor New York, he runs for re-election Monda is what 3536 years old he was born in 91 right, he's 35 years old, he runs for re-election, he gets elected for a second term as mayor that takes him to 4445. Years old, and then he runs for United States Senate. And then he gets elected by new york as a senator let's get real , the communicators plans to locate
Under U.S. copyright law, the doctrine of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107) serves as a vital safeguard for creativity by permitting limited use of copyrighted material without permission when the new work is transformative—adding fresh commentary, criticism, parody, education, or artistic expression that builds upon rather than merely substitutes for the original. In a YouTube appeal, this principle is especially powerful: if your video employs clips, images, or audio in a way that significantly alters their meaning or context (for example, through analysis, satire, or juxtaposition that generates new insights), it strongly weighs in favor of fair use under the first statutory factor (purpose and character of the use). Courts consistently emphasize that transformative works promote the progress of science and the useful arts—the very goal of copyright—without unduly harming the market for the original (the fourth factor). When submitting a YouTube appeal, clearly articulate how your content is not a replacement but a creative extension: reference specific timestamps showing minimal, purposeful excerpts; explain the added value (e.g., cultural critique, educational breakdown, or humorous reinterpretation); and cite the statutory factors to demonstrate good-faith compliance with the law. A well-reasoned appeal grounded in fair use not only defends your channel but upholds the broader ecosystem where creativity thrives through lawful borrowing and reimagination.