@investbamboo it's very disappointing. I wished I didn't fund my wallet, I would have purchased my shares from NGX straight from my bank account.
This is very bad
Lionel Messi is a shameless disrespectful bloke.
It's a good thing #AFA lost the finals. @AFASeleccionEN
Disgraced at the finals. playing and hoping to win through a dishonest means and Karma struck. I know not all Argentine are racists but that doesn't rule out crystal racism
Argentina is a shameless country, hub of racism, fascist country. The disparity display in the field of play during world cup 2026 by Both players and fans. Fighting, aggressive behaviour, foul plays, disrespect and disregard for fellow players speak more about the Argentines.
YOU WERE TO BE A FIREWALL RATHER YOU BECAME A VIRUS. WHAT A BRAIN DEAD MORON YOU'RE. SUCH A DISGRACE. @aonanuga1956
In the theatre of governance, words are not merely alphabets arranged for convenience; they are combustible substances. A statement from the corridors of power is not a roadside whisper tossed into the noisy marketplace of social media hysteria. It carries institutional gravity. This is precisely why the conduct surrounding the dissemination of the alleged deepfake audio linked to the Presidency becomes not merely disappointing, but alarmingly reckless.
When a figure occupying an essential media office abandons the sacred burden of verification and descends into the chaotic trenches of impulsive digital reactionism, professionalism dies a public death. The office ceases to resemble a chamber of strategic communication and begins to mirror an agitated blog comment section clothed in governmental fabric. That's the irony.
A media aide to the Presidency is expected to function as a firewall against misinformation, not as an amplifier or wrapped in vengeful adrenaline. The duty of such an office is not velocity, but validity. Not emotional combustion, but factual filtration. Yet what unfolded revealed something disturbingly antithetical to institutional discipline: a careless romance with unverified material in an age where AI can manufacture voices, manipulate appearances, and fabricate reality with terrifying precision.
One would expect heightened caution from individuals seated near the nucleus of national communication. Instead, what emerged was a spectacle of reaction before reflection a digital stampede where verification was strangled by urgency. The consequences of such carelessness are not abstract. They are tangible. Citizens panic. Political hostility intensifies. Trust in governance erodes. Public discourse degenerates into confusion and paranoia. A nation already navigating economic anxiety and social fractures cannot afford informational arson from individuals entrusted with national messaging.
The most disturbing dimension of this entire episode is not merely the circulation of alleged falsehood, but the institutional symbolism attached to it. When misinformation appears to emanate from, or be legitimized by, a presidential media structure, it acquires an undeserved robe of authenticity. The ordinary citizen, unable to distinguish propaganda from procedure, interprets the dissemination as tacit validation. Thus, a dangerous precedent is born. It is a failure of discipline. A failure of restraint. A failure of intellectual due diligence.
History has repeatedly demonstrated that nations do not collapse only from bullets and corruption; they also decay from informational irresponsibility. Rumour masquerading as truth has ignited riots, destroyed reputations, inflamed ethnic tensions, and destabilized democracies. In the digital age, a deepfake is no longer harmless mischief. It is psychological warfare dressed in pixels and audio waves.
And herein lies the painful juxtaposition: the same office expected to defend factual integrity appeared entangled in the very architecture of misinformation it ought to combat. That contradiction is deafening.
Public communication from state actors must undergo forensic scrutiny before publication. Authenticity must precede amplification. Verification must outrank political impulse.
A nation deserves communicators, not propagandists intoxicated by immediacy. It deserves professionalism, not panic mechanics. Because when power speaks carelessly, fear travels faster than truth. A presidential media office is not a beer parlour symposium where rumours are exchanged like cigarette smoke into midnight air. It is an institutional nerve centre whose utterances possess the potency to soothe or inflame a nation already suspended between economic suffocation and political anxiety.
This VDM needs to face the weight of the law for being the conveyor and disseminator of a fake audio of President Tinubu. This is a clear case of an egregious abuse of the social media platform.
Whenever I see this I laugh. You men think it's a drill. Tell EFCC and see you the Tellie got behind bars. Una think say na UK "If you see something, say it, sort it. Try am you carry Rufai wahala. @officialEFCC