@FlyFifer10 She also said she sent the same statement to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Is this also standard practice? Is this what most 'no comment' interviewees do?
@vimwallace@ghost_wales Jimmy Savile was questioned multiple times by the police, but like Nicola, he was never charged with any crime because of insufficient evidence.
@anthoharris Her memory isn't good enough for her to say that this has been the worst week of her life. She's often said she has no recollection of important events in her past. None what soever. And she can't quite recall many other events either. Was she a lawyer?
@LindseyGrahamSC 'This would be the biggest change in the Middle East in thousands of years, effectively ending the Arab-Israeli conflict.' Israel did not exist until 1947.
@mjdaly57@JohnRentoul@Independent Sir Anthony criticises Sir Keir. Both knighted for services to the establishment. You would think the Trade Unionists and affiliated groups who vote for these types as party leader might catch on - but they won't.
Actually? Actually??
Late December 2025 / Early January 2026: She defended ongoing shipments for “humanitarian reasons” and indicated continuation despite U.S. pressure under Trump. Multiple outlets reported her stating Mexico would keep supplying https://t.co/Nfaat56N99
Late January 2026 (e.g., January 30 briefing in Tijuana): She explicitly said oil exports would continue (via Pemex contracts and humanitarian aid), reversing or clarifying earlier pause reports. A video/transcript reference notes: “México continuará enviando petróleo a Cuba.”https://t.co/qLFU8r8JNq
February 2026: She reiterated support for sending fuel/humanitarian aid, framing it as resisting U.S. “blackmail” or tariffs, and vowed to explore ways to resume/continue https://t.co/RnZKloX5xY
March 30/31, 2026: In a notable press conference, she affirmed Mexico’s sovereign right to send fuel (humanitarian or commercial) and indicated continuation. Reuters and others quoted her defending the practice without signaling a stop.