@LucyGoBag As Iโve said multiple times before, we need national review of mortuary practice and regulation to facilitate a sensible conversation and way forward.
@LucyGoBag Some things being heavily criticised by the HTA in reports are the result of systemic issues, largely outside of individual mortuariesโ control. What would be really positive would be if the HTA advocated for system change - I.e. treating the disease, not the symptoms.
@AliJaneMoore@LucyGoBag Plus, HTA do not regulate vitally important aspects of post-death care (care of the deceased at autopsy, quality and care of dissection, quality of reconstruction). Nobody currently does. We need a sensible conversation/review of mortuary regulation.
@AliJaneMoore@LucyGoBag Systemic issues arenโt being taken into account (the culture of extended periods between death/funeral, increase in public funerals/identification by DNA). This all puts severe pressure on capacity, but the onus is solely on the individual establishments to find ways to manage.
@LucyGoBag@AliJaneMoore For example, I know of mortuaries who have had documents declared inadequate at recent inspections, when they had been judged perfectly acceptable at previous ones. Iโm all for higher standards, but this goalpost-moving needs addressing.
@LucyGoBag@AliJaneMoore Also, HTA appears to be taking a much tougher approach to issues found at inspection. It remains to be seen whether this is a formal, permanent change, but you would assume this would require revised standards to be issuedโฆ
@LucyGoBag@AliJaneMoore HTA classifies shortfalls as Minor, Major and Critical. Also, shortfalls could be against any of the standards, from a chip in a door frame or rust on a trolley, to serious incidents. Unless the shortfalls are broken down into type and severity, proper analysis is not possible.
@mitomavirus@LucyGoBag Yes, but the purpose of the system is to issue warnings of specific threats to specific locations, not to issue prevention advice.