@faizashaheen Frankly I'm embarrassed that my local green party stood down to back him back in 2017. Since then he's repeatedly shown he wasn't who we thought he was.
@faizashaheen@ZackPolanski A shame the independents in Larkswood and Valley didn't quite get over the line, I know they and the Greens would have worked well together.
@ShahrarAli Plenty. this isn't coming out of nowhere. The Greens have been the obvious second party in that borough for a decade. There were plenty of commited environmentalists in the party when I joined in 2014, and most of them haven't gone anywhere. A few of them are now councillors.
I missed that Higham Hill hadn't declared! They now have 31, this is a spectacular result. Waltham Forest council is now a majority Green Party council, wiping out Labour's previous and almost totally dominant control.
Green Party now two short of majority council control in Waltham Forest, from 0. I suspect they will remain short, though. Larkswood and Valley will either be tories or Independents, I reckon. I think those are the only two wards still to declare.
@emreadsthebooks It's probably not a surprise to people within the party, tbh. The last few elections have shown there's huge green support - when canvassing you'd always hear "I want to, but they can't win here" or "I don't want the tories getting in." Seems the message finally cut through.
On a national level, how significant is what is happening in Waltham Forest? Greens have gone from 0 councillors to 20 and counting. The council was pretty much dominated by Labour, except for a handful of tory/reform in Chingford.
So I think that's 8 Green Party councillors in Waltham Forest so far, 9 for Labour, 2 for Conservatives. Greens have long been clear second across the borough, but didn't have the councillors to show for it. Seems that's changing in a big way.
The country falling over itself to talk about Hannah Spencer's maiden speech. There are 650 MPs, how many maiden speeches usually get even a small amount of news coverage? They're so rattled, and I love it.
@Oldgregsnads @ZackPolanski He didn't run for Gorton because he lives in London and is an elected member of the London Assembly. The local party gets to pick their own candidate so they can ensure the right person is picked, not just parachuted in by the national party.
Every time @ZackPolanski is interviewed and a whole bunch of people on social media moan that the Greens aren't what they were before, is exactly WHY Zack was needed. Green Party policy never changed. The problem was always how to get that message across, and Zack is succeeding.
@AlexPanton1@jimthegiant All it takes is good local people to stand up and act. That's why you see pockets of green activity in the countryside, in suburbs and in inner city areas, but without resources (money and people) it's difficult to maintain presence against bigger political machines.
@PeterShoreite@AlexPanton1@jimthegiant It sounds like youβre assuming it's being highlighted because it's unusual. I'm saying it's being highlighted because the stereotype exists. Those aren't the same thing.
@AlexPanton1@jimthegiant Oh absolutely. Labour die hards are one of the worst at painting the Greens a certain way. I saw that when I stood as a candidate myself, and I still see it now. They can't challenge on policies legitimately so they resort to character assassination. Boils my piss, frankly.
@PeterShoreite@AlexPanton1@jimthegiant fetishising? lmao. So we just let all the lazy stereotypes about greens being a) treehuggers b) students c) middle class d) unemployed slide, is that it? If we challenge that narrative and show a different side, suddenly it's fetishising and out of touch. Don't make me laugh.
@AlexPanton1@jimthegiant I don't see it like that. Perhaps because I'm working class, surrounded by working class family and friends, and hearing the lazy stereotypes about the Greens being repeated by them, I also use examples like Hannah to show that their view of the party is outdated.