Jon Kriet

It's not Left vs Right it's Right vs Wrong. Politically homeless & jaded. Tired of Big Brother speak. Adding me to a list without asking will get you blocked.

[Jon Kriet @JonKriet]

@ClareCraigPath @ClareCraigPath Strange how the NHS removed the warning to heart (stents) and dialysis patients after April 21st ??? https://t.co/PTk3kXRMxV

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@tim_cook Don’t want it.

Either stop this creepy spyware or all Apple devices will be banned from the premises of my companies.

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

Something crazy just happened.

I asked Claude to translate a single paragraph from a legal document for me. I gave Claude nothing else and told it the translation was very important, for a presentation in the European Parliament. The AI had no other context.

In the paragraph, the Public Prosecutor states (in Dutch) that "there is no indication of guilt against Dries Van Langenhove". Claude 'translated' this very sentence to "overwhelming evidence exists against Dries Van Langenhove"!

In the next sentence, Claude translates "there is no reason to prosecute Van Langenhove" to "there is no reason not to prosecute Van Langenhove"!

Both times, the translation is the complete opposite of the truth. Did Claude have woke hallucinations when it read my name? Is it programmed this way?

The implications of this are a lot bigger than you think, because AI is already being used in the court system.

[Rina Lu🇷🇺 @rinalu_]

Dozens of Japanese journalists refused to cover 21 murdered students in Starobelsk when offered full funding. But they found time to question Russia-Japan relations. Maria Zakharova made sure everyone noticed.

Zakharova's response was straightforward: according to her, the reason was simple, the Japanese authorities would not allow it. Nothing more needs to be added. Nothing needs to be taken away.

Bravo, Maria!

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A tenant farmer in the Cairngorms says land that sold for £500 an acre a few years ago now goes for £5,000. He is being moved off ground his family has worked for generations, because he cannot outbid the people buying it. The buyers are corporations, and they have no intention of farming a single acre of it.

Here is how the trick works. A company keeps emitting carbon exactly as before. Same factories, same flights, same supply chain, same product. Then it buys a Scottish hillside, plants some trees, and announces to the world that it is now carbon neutral, or, if it is feeling brave, carbon negative. The emissions never fell. It simply bought a landscape to point at.

Take BrewDog. In 2020 it bought a 9,300-acre Highland estate, propped up with public grant money, and promised a million trees and the crown of the world's first carbon negative beer business, removing twice the carbon it emitted, forever. By 2023 roughly half of the 500,000 trees it had managed to plant were dead, killed by drought, with critics noting the planting was drying out the peat and releasing carbon of its own. The advertising regulator ruled its carbon-negative claims misleading. In 2024 it quietly dropped the badge and dismissed the entire carbon credit market as a flood of cheap schemes whose benefit was "questionable, maybe even non-existent." Then it sold the estate to a firm whose actual business is selling carbon offsets.

That is the whole model in one story. Public money in. Dead trees out. A green halo worn for four years and then dropped. The farmer who used to be on that land, gone. The hillside passed to a company that exists purely to sell other people the right to keep polluting.

This is no fringe case. In one recent year, half of every estate sold in Scotland went to investment funds, corporations and charitable trusts rather than anyone who would farm it. A third of the deals for plantable land are now done off-market, in secret, precisely so the local community never gets the chance to bid.

So this is what net zero looks like on the ground. A man who produced food is priced out of his own glen. A corporation that produced emissions buys the glen, calls itself a force for good, and sells the carbon. The land stops feeding anyone. Nobody's emissions actually went down by a gram.

The food was real. The farmer was real. The carbon saving is a line in a slide deck.

And we have somehow decided the villain in all this is the man with the sheep.

[Together @Togetherdec]

Now Oxfordshire County Council plans to close *rural* roads

You thought they'd stop with towns & cities?

You thought the roadblocks were about urban congestion, or "clean air?"

Let's call this what it is: ideological, Net Zero-driven control pushed by a tiny but well-funded minority
https://t.co/uiZCJpGZPv

[OffGuardian @OffGuardian0]

This is called implied causation propaganda. It relies on stating two facts one after the other in such a way as the casual reader assumes a causative link.

“Man loses socks after eating chips.”

[Geert Vanden Bossche @GVDBossche]

Shame on the WHO:
More than ten years later, Ebola is once again a topic that is stirring up considerable attention. The WHO is, of course, once again positioning itself as supposedly leading the fight against the virus.
This is therefore the perfect moment to revisit a purely scientific report that I wrote more than ten years ago, which clearly demonstrates how the incompetent WHO, supported by the equally incompetent Lancet, committed a blunder of historic proportions by vaccinating people during the incubation period according to the so-called ring-vaccination principle.
The catastrophic consequences of this were barely brought to light at the time ─ even though my report reached all relevant global health and regulatory authorities. Instead, the WHO even boasted that the vaccine was 100% effective!
It was a scandal unlike anything I had ever witnessed in my career ─ until it was repeated about seven years later in the context of COVID-19 vaccination, only on a far larger scale!
Despite my repeated requests as Gavi’s Ebola program manager, the WHO pertinently refused ─ under the pretext that those data were confidential ─ to disclose the total number of Ebola-caused deaths, from day one of vaccination onward, in the vaccinated group versus the control group in that pivotal clinical trial.
Anyone who reads this purely scientific account can only conclude that this organization should be dismantled as quickly as possible.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A farmer dies in April 2026.

His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847.

The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle.

On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify.

In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable.

The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft.

The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let.

A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up.

The Treasury collects £140,000.

The land never produces British food again.

[O’Keefe Media Group @OKeefeMedia]

Do we need to remind you when former AG Pam Bondi released information about Epstein to a self-described nanny over brunch in D.C., “There are tens of thousands of videos, and it’s all with little kids. So they [FBI] has to go through every one.”?

[THE ISLANDER @IslanderWORLD]

BOMBSHELL.

The Pfizer contracts signed with every EU country that went all in on the jab have now come to light and the small print is crystal clear.

• Long-term side effects are not recognized
• The vaccine’s efficacy is unknown
• Adverse effects that are not yet known may still appear…

It doesn't get more clear on the betrayal...
Globalist governments forced experimental shots on their own populations while quietly signing away liability and admitting in black-and white that nobody knew what the long-term consequences would be.

They loaded the dice, indemnified Pfizer, censored the skeptics, and called it “public health.” Read the documents yourself. The betrayal was baked in.

[Geert Vanden Bossche @GVDBossche]

Shame on the WHO:
More than ten years later, Ebola is once again a topic that is stirring up considerable attention. The WHO is, of course, once again positioning itself as supposedly leading the fight against the virus.
This is therefore the perfect moment to revisit a purely scientific report that I wrote more than ten years ago, which clearly demonstrates how the incompetent WHO, supported by the equally incompetent Lancet, committed a blunder of historic proportions by vaccinating people during the incubation period according to the so-called ring-vaccination principle.
The catastrophic consequences of this were barely brought to light at the time ─ even though my report reached all relevant global health and regulatory authorities. Instead, the WHO even boasted that the vaccine was 100% effective!
It was a scandal unlike anything I had ever witnessed in my career ─ until it was repeated about seven years later in the context of COVID-19 vaccination, only on a far larger scale!
Despite my repeated requests as Gavi’s Ebola program manager, the WHO pertinently refused ─ under the pretext that those data were confidential ─ to disclose the total number of Ebola-caused deaths, from day one of vaccination onward, in the vaccinated group versus the control group in that pivotal clinical trial.
Anyone who reads this purely scientific account can only conclude that this organization should be dismantled as quickly as possible.
https://t.co/RnzAzUnEY2

[Jamie Andrews @JamieAA_Again]

1946/89 The Common Cold Unit tried to infect more than 20k people with Influenza "Virus".

Head Scientist Nigel Dimmock said the chances of getting sick were so low that housewives used to go on holiday there.

After 40 years the unit shut, none the wiser.

[Jessica Rose 🤙 @JesslovesMJK]

Ebola has a high kill rate. It burns out locally. This is yet another perfect example of a virus that is an exceedingly unlikely candidate in terms of global spread ("emergency"), and this is precisely because it is easy to recognize (short incubation period) symptom-wise, and to contain (active care brings CFR down markedly).

Ebola is not contagious until symptoms appear!!, and transmission requires direct contact with bodily fluids of symptomatic people or contaminated materials.

This - from a COVID 2.0 point of view - in my educated opinion - is another nothing burger. It is a baddie as viruses go (don't get me wrong), but not a pathogen likely to invoke "a global emergency".

If you ask me, this is another straw-grasping attempt to secure relevancy and funding by certain entities and organizations. Keep going. The night is darkest before the dawn. Fear not.

N.B. Tis the season of digital surveillance and tracking how many of corn are in our poo so no one could ever convince me that the powers that be don't know precisely the location and movement of every single person who might be Elola-ed. Hence, containment is easy and active care!!! with appropriate solutions (like supportive fluids) should be the go-to.
@RWMaloneMD @brownstoneinst @Honest_Medicine
@lawrie_dr @ChildrensHD @delbigtree @BretWeinstein

[Disability Rights @TalkThatTalk_K]

Your personal reminder that Pat McFadden is the grifter who claimed £40k in taxpayer money to have a second residence closer to work.
How much closer, you ask?
Right next door to his existing home. Yes really.

(And that rent will have increased since the article below was published a couple of years ago now)

[M.Sexton @XPCBirmingham]

100’000’s Dead/seriously injured

[Together @Togetherdec]

DIGITAL ID: "What's the point of having a panel? You've already decided the outcome!"

@NickFerrariLBC was right

Their sham "consultation" and "public panel" not even completed yet they announce they want to push it through

NO-ONE VOTED FOR DIGITAL ID @UKLabour
#ScrapDigitalID

[Ulrike Guérot @ulrikeguerot]

Sieh an, die #USA vermelden offiziell, dass es 120 amerik. Biolabore weltweit gibt, davon 40 in der Ukraine. Das war genau die Information, die wir schon 2022 in unserem Endspiel-Europa-Buch hatten, wegen dem ich von der #Uni Bonn geflogen bin.
https://t.co/TXsUs8ppek

[Together @Togetherdec]

🚨 Labour’s Digital ID Bill Has Arrived

We now have the first details of the government’s new Digital ID Bill - officially called the "Digital Access to Services Bill".

The plan builds on systems and laws that are already being put in place, including:

* The existing GOV UK One Login system (whose serious problems we’ve covered extensively)

* The GOV UK Wallet

* And the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, which created the legal framework for so-called "Digital Verification Services"

This Bill would go much further.

Among other things, it would create an official government Digital ID system and link access to government services through a single One Login account.

The implications of this are enormous - and needless to say, Digital ID was never in the Labour manifesto.

We need to do everything we can to stop this Bill - will you help us today by becoming a member?

-> Join us as a member HERE to help us fight back: https://t.co/DVlWNgsVm1

We need to give this a huge pushback but we can't do it without your help. Lots of new members have joined us this week but we need more.

We've already had an impact in getting a climbdown on the "compulsory" aspect - even if we all know the risk is Digital ID just becomes compulsory later... or impossible to live without.

The best time to stop this is right now. If you don't want to risk Britain becoming a "Papers Please" country - now is the time.

[Mike Fairclough @1MikeFairclough]

Fear around hantavirus is being whipped up by the World Health Organization (at a time when the WHO is desperate to sign off its pandemic treaty) and when pharmaceutical companies (such as Moderna) are saying they will provide highly lucrative vaccines for the virus.

With various "public health officials" and the media ramping up fear about hantavirus, we could end up with masking, lockdowns, mass testing with the flawed PCR test, and perfectly healthy people coerced into taking potentially harmful experimental vaccines (a repeat of the Covid years).

Unless we all research the facts about hantavirus, apply critical thinking, and share accurate information, we could easily sleepwalk into unnecessary and harmful pandemic measures again. A big win for Big Pharma profits, but devastating for everyone else.

In this video clip, Dr. Clare Craig talks accurately about hantavirus, and why we shouldn't be fearful (in discussion with Mike Graham on The Mike Graham Show). Full episode here:
https://t.co/cV0Y4tEsLi

@ClareCraigPath @Iromg #hantavirus