@ChristineW7@Polybius3636@xwanyex Why obsess over voting if action works better? Action has been used to successfully rig voting against swathes of the population, guaranteeing existential outcomes which are not winnable at any ballot box. Action can fix that.
@genderskeptic@ArmstrongT97969@caledoniapatria The lands they each call home, the climates they endure, the diets sustained by their territories, the histories of their lands and peoples, those they call ancestors, their languages and dialects, their naming conventions, the list is endless.
Do you need evidence for these???
@genderskeptic@ArmstrongT97969@caledoniapatria The suffixes are very on-topic lol.
Do you believe ethnicity doesn't exist? Or perhaps, you deny ethnic distinctions beween the Scots and the English, somehow? I can't help you grasp this if you don't make clear where you stand.
@genderskeptic@ArmstrongT97969@caledoniapatria I expanded upon my claim, providing additional areas of distinction intended to demonstrate how silly your question comes off as.
Are you asking for evidence of Scot-land and Eng-land being two different lands? If so, I might need to ask you to fuck off lmao
@genderskeptic@ArmstrongT97969@caledoniapatria Ancestry is the foundational component of ethnicity. Both ethnicities in question have distinct ancestries.
Both are connected to distinct lands.
Both have distinct histories.
Both have distinct genetics.
Both have distinct cultural practices.
Understand?
@AngelaHaye4@ArmstrongT97969@PemFergie If someone born to Polish parents, lives in a Polish community, speaks Polish, and is a constituent part of politically active ethnic enclaves, they are just as much of a problem. Obviously the more distant they are to us, the more apparent their phenotypical differences are.
@ChrisMcGee10@ArmstrongT97969 Religion is a fairly accurate indicator for how distinct foreigners are. If from a foreign land they being their foreign religion, what else is foreign about them, beyond the obvious appearance? It is an indicator of distinction, not the entire distinction itself.