I am incessantly asked about @_AdvanceUK policies. These are being worked on by our College at the moment and will be ready in due course.
However, so that people are clear on the direction of travel Advance would take, here are a few snippets:
Repeal very nearly all laws put on our statute books since Blair was PM, including but not limited to the Human Rights Act; the Equality Act; the Climate Change Act. Remove the ECHR (from all of the UK) and Exit the UNHCR. Ditch DEI, Net Zero and the Windsor Framework.
Having returned power to Parliament, enforce our borders: dinghies would be stopped in the Channel. All illegal migrants in the UK and those that overstay visas would be detained and deported to the maximum extent possible. Any of their home countries refusing to cooperate would be sanctioned.
End Indefinite Leave to Remain and cease granting British citizenship. Anyone granted ILR under this Labour government will have it revoked, reversing the Boris wave.
End benefits for all foreigners.
Slash taxes on the working and middle classes. Make it pay to work.
Slash benefits for people who can but do not work.
Establish tax policies which favour families and responsibly having children - Bonk for Britain: a tax allowance for marriage, a tax allowance for each child and a tax allowance if a spouse stays at home to care for children. Cancel child benefits, which would be replaced by the above.
Remove the state from our families. Cease the indoctrination of our children at school.
Return our freedoms and freedom of speech.
Cancel Digital ID.
Stop the policing of tweets and have zero tolerance to real crime - there is no such thing as petty crime.
That is just for starters!
@bogus_freeman@RyLiberty And where does that get most people? A statement like “Nick is a fed” shouldn’t be left to gut instinct.
Who cares if he is?
Let’s say he’d a fed, does that change the fact that you agree with some things and disagree with some things that he says?
She’s actually a legend.
They won’t kill her because it will be too obvious.
Im calling incoming intense lawfare for her husband/family.
That would break her more than anything they could do to her.
As one of the last truth speakers, I hope she’s ready.
Expanding the network: Tate brothers, Dave Smith, Max Blumenthal, Tucker Carlson, Mel (@Villgecrazylady) and more will have legal files and personal text messages related to my time at Turning Point, PragerU, and Daily Wire, plus my private conversations with people like Seth Dillon and Dave Rubin.
These people have my EXPLICIT permission to release everything publicly if anything happens to me.
Charlie’s death and the audacity of the people like Josh Hammer eulogizing him means we must all share information and let the truth rise up like a lion.
@jojofruit@RyLiberty But if something is objectively evil, and 2 important people are very close to figuring out the root cause, it would be way more beneficial if people didn’t take the opportunity to slander either of them in an online opinion arena.
@jojofruit@RyLiberty The main one is that people can’t accept that someone might say some good things and some bad things.
It’s not natural to agree with everything someone says, or disagree either.
Nick might say good things. And bad things, so had Candace.
@jojofruit@RyLiberty No you explained your opinion. In your opinion, Nick is a petty fool and tears everyone down.
“Unity doesn’t happen because of my opinion” is an assumption that your opinion is correct. Ambitious to say the least.
@esotericdoge@georgegalloway@RealCandaceO All in all, it’s much safer to assume you’re being lied to.
At least you can prepare for things.
You would be a fool to assume that the powers that be have your best interests at heart.
@esotericdoge@georgegalloway@RealCandaceO Completely out of context. She’s not using a dream as objective proof. She’s adding it to embellish a story. Most people would know this by default.