Sweden's recent election is a lesson for the Australian right: if the left is importing voters, we must do the same.
Seven in ten Swedish voters of non-European background backed left wing parties. In Australia, One Nation support reaches 29 per cent among mainland European born voters, but only 9 per cent among Asian-born voters. Migration does not merely change the population. It changes the future electorate.
The right must keep migration permanently low while prioritising compatible countries otherwise winning one election means nothing if the migration policy guarantees the left wins every election that follows.
Reminder that in 2018 Sudanese refugee lawyer Nyadol "there is no White culture" Nyuon, while working for law firm Arnold Bloch Liebler, was heavily involved in a campaign by ethnic minority lobby groups to force the police and the media to stop talking about African gang crime.
As a result, Victoria Police stopped releasing statistics on the nationality of offenders, and along with a compliant corporate media started gaslighting the public by claiming that African gangs didn't exist (just like White culture).
Earlier this year Victoria Police gave up in the face of non-stop African gang machete attacks, and admitted there were dozens of gangs with hundreds of members committing thousands of violent crimes.
We still don't have good data on criminal offences, but we do know that youths of African background make up 50% of the young people in custody despite being about 0.5% of the population.
Australians are competing with hundreds for rental accommodation and they’re stuck in ambulances because there aren’t enough hospital beds.
One nation will deliver net-negative migration.
Watch INVADERS from the hellhole known as Zimbabwe on the London subway signing in their language to oblivious British people “You colonialists have lost.”
They are celebrating the conquest of the west via replacement migration.
We are witnessing globalist, sponsored colonialism in reverse.
Colonialism, undoubtedly built up much of the Third World and triggered a population explosion.
Now those populations have been weaponized..
The incident has been reviewed, and we have no concerns over the officer's actions and we are satisfied that they were reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances.
We would ask that footage is not further shared to allow the legal process to take its course.
🚨🇩🇪 TURKISH MUSLIM SLAUGHTERS SIX IN GERMANY, MSM Is suppressing the truth as usual.
6 innocent people were shot to death in Stade, Germany today at a youth facility
4 of them were young girls!
Authorities have now confirmed the shooter was a Turkish Muslim, invader.
Replacement migration/white genocide in action..
Karl Stafanovic found out you can’t have it both ways.
The same platform he used to call for my imprisonment over my Aussie poster series has now fired him for featuring Tommy Robinson on his show.
Resurrecting this dead issue to activate women against the right at this existential moment in the immigration fight needs to be shut down.
Recent polling has One Nation around 31% of the primary vote with immigration being the single biggest reason voters are backing them. That’s where the public’s attention is and that’s where the momentum is coming from.
Immigration restriction exists under a social license, allowing unpopular or poorly thought-through policies has previously destroyed the right in Australia. Hanson’s EasyTax proposal in the 1998 federal election ruined One Nation electorally at a time when immigration was equally as salient a concern as today. It is entirely plausible we see a repeat of this with abortion.
Abortion is a low-salience issue. Australians don’t rank it among their top political concerns, and it is nowhere near the vote mover that immigration has become. A February 2026 Redbridge poll for The Australia Institute (N=2,010) found 62% support access to abortion services, with another 25% supporting it in limited circumstances. Only 8% oppose it outright. Even among One Nation voters themselves, a substantial majority support access in at least some circumstances.
Even if your concern is solely with sex-selective abortion, it has been empirically demonstrated that certain migrant communities (particularly from India and China) exhibit notably higher rates of early induced abortion, including patterns consistent with sex-selective practices that produce skewed sex ratios at birth far above the natural level. Australian-born women show lower rates.
But regardless of the nuance of your preferred ban, attempts to legislate in this area walks a tightrope. The distinction between opposing sex-selective abortion and restricting abortion rights more broadly is unlikely to survive media coverage or partisan campaigning. Opponents will almost certainly present it as an attack on women’s bodily autonomy, regardless of the narrower intent and the electoral apocalypse will ensue.
The left can no longer rely on accusations of racism to halt growing opposition to mass immigration. Instead, it is attempting to recast the right as anti-women, sexist and anti-abortion. That is particularly risky when women have been moving towards One Nation in significant numbers, and in some polls more than men. Australia has largely avoided the political gender divide seen elsewhere. Why hand opponents a wedge issue when the public is already delivering a mandate on immigration?
The opportunity to secure meaningful change on immigration, demographics and our existential problem is rare and may not come again. Turning a low-priority social issue into a central political battle risks everything by energising opponents and distracting from the issue that created the momentum in the first place.
Keep the focus on immigration. Don’t squander momentum when it is finally translating into political leverage. Have your vote of conscience as Labor and Liberals have done but don’t risk it as National platform or an artificial right wing position.
As by definition, no, my close friend Chock is not Australian. He’s ethnically Colombian. The kids he has with his ethnically Australian partner are half Colombian, half Australian. Is this not hard to grasp?? Him and I have spoken at length about this and to some extent he agrees. Doesn’t mean we can’t be friends over a small disagreement.
Is Avi Australian? No. Is Rukshan Australian? No. You are ethnically Israeli and Indian, that’s what you are and where you originate from. Only Anglo-Celtic European and/or Indigenous Australians are ethnically Australian. This is not hard to grasp.
My issue is with the immigration that has happened over the past few decades and our falling birthrate, that ethnic Australians are being replaced in their own country. For you that might not matter, but for many of us Australians it does and it’s worth fighting for. I want the majority (not all, but majority) of Australians in Australia to be Australian. Again, is this not hard to grasp? Is this extreme, Avi? And I'm sure Pauline would agree on this.
Do I want my close friend Chocky deported? No. Do I even want you deported, Avi? I don't like you but No. Do I want Rukshan deported? No. What I do want is for our government to shut the gate, deport illegals and remigrate anyone who has come here over the past 5 years (as a starting point), and then start working on our birthrate so Australians maintain as a strong portion, the main ethnic race in their own country. And we need to aim for a birthrate like Israel so we don't need immigration. Right now, on our current path, Australians going to be replaced in their own country within decades, and that matters to many of us Australians.
If we can't define an Australian and what that ethically looks like, then we can't defend it against the uni-party, who have, over the past 20 years decided to put dollars over its people.
“What about the aboriginals that served”
What about the other 99.9% of ANZACs who were White Europeans fighting for a nation defined by a racially exclusive immigration policy and that barred Aboriginals from serving?