Jord

[Jord @Jordan_Boxy]

✨

[Kristin Raworth 🇨🇦 @KristinRaworth]

I've never sen anything more accurate

[UtdTruthful @Utdtruthful]

🚨🗣️ Michael Owen: “Imagine if you got rid of Michael Carrick, just imagine it, and you brought in whoever, I don't CARE who it is, EVEN a born winner, somebody they've already had, that type of manager.

“Imagine if things started spiralling, started going POORLY again; the ownership would get absolutely lynched.

“I'm astounded by certain people saying no, they shouldn't appoint him. Astounded. Why on earth is this even a question? I don't get it.

“I'm not saying, “go and give him a 10-year contract, everything's perfect”. But bloody hell, what more can he do? You've just got to let this roll.

“This Manchester United team looks like they're on the way back at this stage. Why would you interfere with anything?”

#MUFC [@MailSport]

[Harry Eccles @Heccles94]

Can we get this shared 10,000 times?

"War crimes don't hide sex crimes!"

[sofie ☭ @darlingube]

im supposed to believe this is necessary so women can wear their hair out in public

[mason @onehandpolitics]

Imagine watching these horrors and genuinely believing the US is there to help the Iranian people

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

Wait what⁉️The US & UK overthrew The Democratically elected Iranian Government in 1953!

Everyone should take 50 seconds to watch this clip.

RIP Charlie Kirk.

[Montgomery Toms @MontgomeryToms]

Insanity - get behind Restore. Reform are just going from bad to worse.

[adam @AdameMedia]

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 TUCKER CARLSON:

"This is Israel's last chance to drag the U.S. into a war because future generations of Americans are distancing themselves from Israel."

He’s 100% right.

[Gareth Icke @garethicke]

This is the most predictable move I've seen for a while.
We're sleep walking into a dystopian hellscape, but we're too busy arguing to unite against it.

[Together @Togetherdec]

This will only ensure that NO-ONE has freedom online, @KemiBadenoch, as you must by now be aware

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

Digital ID / age verification is now being heavily promoted to 'keep our children safe'.
This is an egregious deception and it must be rejected.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok.

The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet.

And yes… you already know where it leads.

OneLogin.

A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account.

This ban is not the end goal.
It is one verification type.
One tiny draconian token.
One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle.

And the equation remains the same:

OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID.

Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do:

They’ll introduce the gate first.

To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control.

It will be a government check.
A government login.
A government permission slip.

You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.”

This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front.

And once the token exists, it becomes the default.
Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement.

Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash.

Because what they’re building is not an age gate.
It’s a permission gate.
A surveillance gate.

A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled.

They will see what you do.
When you do it.
What you search.
What you access.
What you post.

And people will still be saying, with a straight face:
“Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.”

That’s the bait.

Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?”

And notice what he’s really saying.

He is not empowering parents.

He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted.

The same government that has lied to you for years about safety.

The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection.

The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind.

And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again.

A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring.

Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier:

Henry VIII powers.

Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction.

And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House.

They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State.

The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen.

And it gets worse.

Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends.

So what exactly are you “consulting” on?
A decision that’s already been made.
A system that’s already being implemented.

A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be.

Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children.

They will sell it as “tracking attendance.”
But it isn’t an attendance system.
It is a digital tether.

A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions.

And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous:

A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens.

Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply.

No access.
No platform.
No digital participation.
No “privileges.”
Just compliance.

And here’s the part people are missing:

They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end.

They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it.

They can amend laws at any time.
They can expand definitions at any time.
They can widen the net at any time.

Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges.

The lawmakers and the enforcers.

And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations.

That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.”

This isn’t safeguarding.
It’s centralisation.

And it doesn’t stop there.

The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation.

Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing.

No new “big scary bill.”
No headline.
No national debate.
Just silent regulatory expansion.
A little more coercion.
A little more surveillance.
A little more permissioning.

Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter.

And you’ll be told it’s normal.
You’ll be told it’s safety.
You’ll be told it’s “for the children.”
This consultation is a farce.
The law is being passed.

Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture.

This is not even the start of mission creep.

This is another step.
Another spoke.
Another token.
Another gate.

And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety.

Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number.

There are privacy-preserving options.
There are local-device checks.
There are non-centralised approaches.
But that is not the point.
Because the point is not safety.
The point is control.
This is part of the digital gulag.
The panopticon.

A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key.

Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The UK has become Orwell’s worst nightmare

[LIZ CROKIN @LizCrokin]

Things are escalating quickly.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇺🇸 Meanwhile in Los Angeles

Someone just went and flashed some of Epstein’s most famous clients along with number of references in the files‼️

No way does Bill Gates top Bill Clinton.

[Lewis Brackpool @Lewis_Brackpool]

I feel physically sick and anxious, but Britain must not look away.

It must be in the public conciousness how widespread the failings from institutions and the ruling class have been, and the graphic consequences it has had on these girls.

[LIZ CROKIN @LizCrokin]

Calling @RealAlexJones — time to have the filmmaker who woke up over 100 million people in 2020 alone about Pizzagate on your show.

Mike Smith!👇🏻

Nothing can stop the Great Awakening.

[LIZ CROKIN @LizCrokin]

OUT OF SHADOWS IS THE VIRAL DOCUMENTARY THAT WOKE UP OVER 100 MILLION PEOPLE IN 2020 ALONE ON PIZZAGATE! 🍕

Out of Shadows is the most viral documentary in history and it woke up the world — literally over 100 million people in 2020 alone in at least 25 different languages! — on the truth about Pizzagate.

This viral film even got Microsoft to cancel their deal with Satanic witch Marina Abramovic.

Thank you @Crux41507251 for all you sacrificed and for believing in me and the truth!

Watch Out of Shadows for free on X below.👇🏻

[Lewis Brackpool @Lewis_Brackpool]

This is the longest delay to an FOI request I’ve had to date. Clearly the government is very nervous.

The British government have delayed my request into meetings between senior ministers and Larry Ellison’s Oracle for the FOURTH time.

Oracle is one of the world’s largest technology corporations, specialising in government data infrastructure, cloud services, surveillance-adjacent analytics, and AI systems used by states across the world.

Larry Ellison, its founder, has been on public record speaking about how digital systems, particularly AI-driven platforms, can be used by governments to shape, influence, and regulate human behaviour at scale.

Being the fourth delay, I am expecting a response now by the 6th of March.