@harraulted@philosophymeme0 He would prob disagree with the very apologetic metaphysical arguements for god's existence, but I wouldn't be surprised if he took a kierkegaardian approach ngl
@Toasty_Crumpets@experiencetil@Femboy_0ccult@philosophymeme0 Can't disagree with any of your last points. I just think that it's incorrect to say that science doesn't make unfalsifiable assumptions (not a bad thing and that doesnt mean fuck off and do nothing)
@Mmmm_nuh_uh@Gattungswesen25 Wouldn't this contradict your first point? As if materialism only needs to apply behariorally then wouldn't the study of metaphysics be useless as it's not correlated to praxis(through a marxist lens)/gen(I'm not trying to strawman but I'm not sure if I am lol)
@Toasty_Crumpets@experiencetil@Femboy_0ccult@philosophymeme0 Yes but now were shifting the goalpost to probably and generally, and this is ok(again I'm not trying to make an anti-science thing). These observations can describe phenomena but can't really tell you the why without interpretation(though I got lost about your main point lol)