"El nazismo solo fue el intento de radicalizar la esclavitud, el racismo y el colonialismo que ya existía en Occidente. El ideólogo del nazismo, Alfred Rosenberg, dijo que la sociedad racial ideal era la de EEUU, Hitler imitó las leyes Jim Crow de EEUU."
Domenico Losurdo, historiador italiano, sobre el origen del nazismo y cómo Hitler se fijó en el apartheid racial de EEUU para crear su régimen racista en Alemania.
¿Se puede llamar "progreso" a una riqueza que se construye sobre las cenizas de un pueblo entero?
La Guerra de la Triple Alianza no fue un conflicto más: fue la guerra más devastadora de América del Sur, un quiebre absoluto que redibujó mapas, deudas v destinos.
Periodista de Fox New: Rubio me dijo que el régimen cubano representa una amenaza para la seguridad nacional. Mencionó drones militares...
🇨🇺 Canciller cubano, Bruno Rodríguez: Cuba es una isla pequeña. 10 millones de habitantes. ¿Con base en qué lógica? ¿Cuál sería el sentido común detrás de la idea de que Cuba podría amenazar a una superpotencia nuclear? En segundo lugar, tendremos que preguntarle al secretario de Estado si tiene alguna evidencia. Lo he escuchado mentir una y otra vez sobre estos temas.
🚨 LULA DA SILVA ACABA DE EXPLOTAR LA MENTIRA GLOBAL 🔥
“Ni yo, ni la Unión Europea, ni Estados Unidos aceptamos ese acuerdo… ¡y ahora vuelven a inventar que Irán va a fabricar armas nucleares!
¡NO las van a desarrollar!
Es la misma vieja estrategia: primero te mienten, luego te destruyen.
A América Latina nos pintan como un continente de narcos. Al mundo árabe lo convierten en sinónimo de terrorismo.
¿Y quién es el “bueno” en esta película?
¡Ellos! Siempre ellos.
¡Basta de mentiras para justificar guerras!”
¿Te suena familiar? Lula lo dijo clarito. Copia, pega y que se haga viral.
#LaVerdadDuele #LulaNoSeCalla #HipocresiaOccidental #IranNoEsElEnemigo
El liberalismo conduce indefectiblemente hacia el individualismo, el individualismo conduce indefectiblemente hacia el subjetivismo, y el subjetivismo conduce indefectiblemente hacia el nihilismo.
🇧🇫 Ibrahim Traore on neocolonialism:
‘Those imperialists consider that we belong to them, and that our wealth belongs to them. They think they can continue to tell us what is good for our states, Africa, our continent that suffered so much because of the imperialists. This era is gone forever, our resources will remain for us and our populations.’
🇬🇧🇨🇳 When Britain quietly turns back to China and everyone knows why
This week in Beijing, something important happened.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer sat down with Xi Jinping and called for a “long-term, consistent, comprehensive strategic partnership” between Britain and China.
Starmer is the first British PM to visit China in eight years and the timing is not accidental.
The world is shifting fast.
While the US under Donald Trump is threatening tariffs, seizing territories and openly destabilising alliances, countries are doing what rational actors always do when uncertainty rises: they diversify risk.
Starmer didn’t mention Trump by name, but he didn’t need to. The message was loud and clear.
China is the world’s second-largest economy. Britain’s third-largest trading partner and increasingly, one of the few sources of predictability left in global trade.
Starmer called for a “more sophisticated” relationship with China, in other words, ending Britain’s habit of swinging between enthusiasm, hostility and last-minute damage control.
Xi, for his part, was unusually direct.
He acknowledged past tensions, criticised the political back and forth that damaged relations and framed UK-China ties as something bigger than day-to-day disagreements.
“Good things often come with difficulties,” Xi said. Leaders, he added, shouldn’t shy away from them.
That line wasn’t just for Starmer. It was aimed squarely at Britain’s domestic critics.
Because this visit has already triggered backlash in London, especially over the approval of China’s new embassy and long-running security fears.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth many Western governments are now facing: you can talk values all you like, but you still have to pay the bills.
Starmer arrived in Beijing with more than 50 senior business leaders in tow, hunting for trade, investment and stability while Britain struggles with growth, a cost-of-living crisis at home and Britain isn’t alone.
In just weeks, leaders from Canada, South Korea and Finland have all made similar trips, and Germany is next.
China sees the opening clearly.
As Western alliances fracture under pressure, Beijing is positioning itself as the adult in the room, talking about stability, dialogue and long-term cooperation while others swing between threats and tantrums.
You don’t have to believe China’s narrative wholesale to see what’s happening.
This isn’t countries “choosing China” over the US. It’s countries quietly preparing for a world where the US is no longer a reliable anchor and China, for better or worse, is unavoidable.
That’s not ideology, that’s realism and this week in Beijing, Britain finally admitted it.