They don’t want Elon Musk to give his trillion to the poor.
They want Elon Musk to give his trillion to them so they can take their cut, split it with their comrades and causes, then look virtuous by throwing to the poor whatever scraps remain.
The left is not furious over @elonmusk’s wealth.
They are furious that he is able to accomplish so much with money voluntarily given, while leftist politicians take it by force and make things worse.
Elon is hated because he is evidence of their incompetence and corruption.
@CynicalPublius Democrats controlled the House of Representatives for 40 years straight - 1955 through 1994 - with an average of 261 Democrats versus 175 Republicans.
Records, 84th Congress (1955-1957) thru the 103rd Congress (1993-1995): https://t.co/rfC8B1R2K7
Nick Fuentes confirms he is a now a moderate Democrat, calls for President Trump to be impeached, and wants the GOP to be destroyed.
Fuentes has been attacking Trump since 2016 and has admitted he never cared about immigration, and his sole litmus test is hatred of Israel.
The Supreme Court’s just said that you can’t gerrymander by race and all the people who claim not to be racist are really angry that they can’t be racist.
'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time, (cont'd) https://t.co/xtK8yqxvzK
[Reads past headline] He retaliated 3 or more weeks **before this Pope business? Against a program that’s only existed a few years? Which now experiences less than 10% of the earlier workload?
“The federal government reached out to the charity in late March about the cancellation of the funding.”
“The Office of Refugee Resettlement… has paid Catholic Charities in Miami for several years to house immigrant children who enter the U.S. without parents or adult supervision.”
“…the Department of Health and Human Services said the daily population of unaccompanied migrant children in the agency’s [DHHS] care was “significantly lower,” at 1,900, under the Trump administration compared to a peak of 22,000 under the Biden administration.”
@MZHemingway
Read more at: https://t.co/KMjn1X6FpU
Sharyl, I propose you run a different poll: Are humans inherently flawed or not?
It springs from one of my favorite Thomas Sowell passages:
Fred Barnes: What is the liberal premise?
Thomas Sowell: I guess, the Rousseau notion, you know, "that man is born free, but is everywhere in chains" that the real problem with the world is that the institutions are wrong. If the institutions were right, then man would, there were nothing in human nature that would cause us to be unhappy. It's the fact that we have the wrong institutions.
Fred Barnes: What is the conservative premise?
Thomas Sowell: That man is flawed from, from day one. And that there are no solutions, there are only trade-offs. And whatever you do to deal with one of man's flaws, it creates another problem. But that you try to get the best trade-off you can get. And that's all you can hope for.
Yale and Princeton research:
White liberals ‘patronize’ minorities by downplaying competence - conservatives don’t
Researchers blame good intentions
1. “White liberals present themselves as less competent when addressing minorities, while conservatives use the same vocabulary no matter what the race of their audience, according to a newly released study.
Yale and Princeton researchers found that both white Democratic presidential candidates and self-identified liberals played down their competence when speaking to minorities, using fewer words that conveyed accomplishment and more words that expressed warmth.
On the other hand, there were no significant differences in how white conservatives, including Republican presidential candidates, spoke to white versus minority audiences.
“White liberals self-present less competence to minorities than to other Whites - that is, they patronize minorities stereotyped as lower status and less competent…”
2. “The researchers then set up an experiment in which white liberals were asked to respond to hypothetical individuals named “Emily” and “Lakisha.”
"[L]iberal individuals were less likely to use words that would make them appear highly competent when the person they were addressing was presumed to be black rather than white,” said the release. “No significant differences were seen in the word selection of conservatives based on the presumed race of their partner.”
3. “Ms. Dupree said the “competence downshift” could indicate a greater eagerness by white liberals to connect with those of other races.”
https://t.co/rD7V7aiUBL