Grateful to @AmReformer and @tlloydcline for publishing my article, “The Theological Origins of Political Power.”
My hope is that it brings depth to our discussions of political authority and its relationship to religion within God’s created order.
https://t.co/f0MLljdwSg
“Only a demanding religion can beat the machines.” - @crwiley1962
You are going to read this book when it comes out. Go and pre-order it through @canonpress 📖
https://t.co/cnikhJ0ujk
I call on @realDonaldTrump to abolish Pride Month and replace it with Traditional Family Month.
Let us praise and encourage the mothers, fathers, and families who are faithfully building the future of the United States.
The family is the foundation of a strong nation. 🇺🇸
@LisaMo032919@realDonaldTrump Trump has his problems. He should still promote the Traditional Family as the foundation of all prosperous nations. This post is more about the family and Trumps responsibility to promote such. Not praising Trump himself.
We think of education in terms of rigor. The ancients thought of school as leisure. Knowledge is not conquered by force. It is received through attention, wonder, and delight.
Power is not inherently evil. It is actually a natural good that has a likeness to the character of God. Christian’s, by grace, ought to pursue and wield power for the good of those around them.
Petrus Van Mastricht on Justification by Faith Alone:
“Most of the Reformed state that it influences justification insofar as it is the instrument whereby we take hold of Christ’s righteousness, by which alone we are justified, that is, under the reckoning of instrumentality. This is true insofar as justification speaks of our passive justification, to the extent that from his faith alone a believer gathers that he has been justified; and if you should also understand it as the active justification of God, insofar as it is a moral instrument, that God requires it so that he may grant and impute to us the righteousness of his Son, the righteousness of his Son, so that on account of that alone we may be justified by him: and in this way the moral instrument will be nothing but the condition without which he does not will to apply to us the righteousness of his Son.”
Theoretical-Practical Theology, Vol. 5, 197-198.
"I fear all our attempts to produce political happiness by the solitary influence of human reason will be as fruitless as the search for the philosopher’s stone. It seems to be reserved to Christianity alone to produce universal, moral, political, and physical happiness. Reason produces, it is true, great and popular truths, but it affords motives too feeble to induce mankind to act agreeably to them. Christianity unfolds the same truths and accompanies them with motives, agreeable, powerful, and irresistible."
Benjamin Rush to Noah Webster, July 20, 1798. Butterfield, Letters of Rush, 2:799.
Grateful to Birdhouse and @CodyEdds for publishing my article, “God Understanding, God Understood, and God Beloved: The Trinity in Light of the Psychological Analogy’.
My prayer is that it would sharpen our thinking and defense of Trinitarian orthodoxy and inspire wonder in us as we worship the Triune God.
https://t.co/E4eG2jzLCp
"The mystery of the Trinity is a mystery that ought to lead to worship. It is the doctrine that as we conform to its reality, we become who we were made to be."
@JosephGilbert_ writing about the Trinity for birdhouse today:
https://t.co/AKOtatAwOk
That can be a definition of nuance. Often times, however, the term is extended into a context where it takes on the idea of a ‘third-way’ or synthesis of a thesis and an anti-thesis. If it is used to bring clarity and to further our understanding of a principle then great. If it is being used to get people to give up their principles, then no bueno.
To quote @joe_rigney
We don’t need nuance. We need clarity. Most of the time when things need to be ‘nuanced’ it is because we are not making the proper distinctions.
I’ve seen this quite a bit among PCA elders. The reaction to calls for nuance on left-coded issues (i.e. sexuality or racism) is strong while nuance on right-coded issues (i.e. Christian Nationalism) is portrayed as reasonable and balanced. “Nuance for me but not for thee!”