Josh

“Ask a man his philosophy and he’ll be annoying for an hour; teach a man to do philosophy and he’ll be annoying for life.” - KF

[Josh @JoshHeter]

If I’m being honest, the way I feel about the ‘90s is comparable to the way certain Baby Boomers feel about the ‘60s. So, I feel super fortunate that I was allowed to help put this together.

Available now…

https://t.co/byyV1ZRr8f

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@mariana057 When asked if they had a message they’d like to send Sting, Andy Summers and Stewart Copeland replied “Can’t Stand Losing You.”

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@maggiewestrum @jakefisher Yes

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@keithdorejel The collapse of academia =/= the scholarship problem.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@ChaseDaniel Would happily send you a copy…

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@xrizz101x @river_dusty Get real. There are plenty of other people who grew up without a childhood.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@xrizz101x @river_dusty Also, can you point to even 1 other person in the history of the world who had this sort odd demeanor, where they didn’t have a childhood and as a result, as a grown man, they enjoyed sleeping in beds with kids but it was totally innocent?

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@xrizz101x @river_dusty Right… you said that the video you posted itself should lead to the conclusion you’re after… not all that other stuff.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@jamster83 We know it’s legit because you can see that it’s published by the trusted source of “News.”

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@xrizz101x @river_dusty … what specifically about this video requires a normal person to conclude that MJ was nothing but a loving, pure-hearted person? The singing? The dancing? The smiling? What exactly is the connection between being a good entertainer and a non-creep?

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@blackwelldb

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@OliverJia1014 1. He trots this out most often in response to criticism (i.e. “its 4 kids so it doesnt matter if it doesnt make sense”); 2. There are 2 types of “kids stories”: a) for kids & kids at heart, & b) for kids (that most will grow out of). SW can be for kids w/out being Power Rangers.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@TatooineSons

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@Ale29863961Yuri At best, doesn’t this just change the *timing* of the poor decision to have the remaining Jedi (who are in hiding) still walking around in (what are essentially) their Jedi uniforms?

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@MikeBeauvais

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@avielijahu @osgamer74 That seems to be a reason to conclude that the way people are actually using “atheism” / “atheist” is the way academics use the term…

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@StarWarsSession

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@RomanIgla @osgamer74 @DreadedNuance You can use terms any way you’d like, but if that’s what you mean by “agnostic” / “atheist,” you’ll essentially be the only one using the terms that way and you’ll be talking past most everyone.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@jennmint You might enjoy our new book…

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@RomanIgla @osgamer74 @DreadedNuance At any rate, the primary use of “agnosticism” is believing/defending neither theism (the view that God exists) nor atheism (the view that God does not exist). In regard to this primary definition, “agnostic atheist” is logically incoherent.

[Josh @JoshHeter]

@RomanIgla @osgamer74 @DreadedNuance Yes, 1 way to use the term is that agnosticism is the view that God’s existence is unknowable in principle. But it’s strange to admit “There’s no way to know not-x, but I believe not-x.” If x/not-x is truly unknowable; it’s unreasonable to take either position.