I’ve heard from several members they agree with some of the Articles of Impeachment but not all of them.
If the motion to kill my resolution by referring it to committee fails, and we proceed to the Articles themselves, I’ll request a vote on each of the Articles separately.
This raises an interesting question about the nature of the judicial system. If Texas voters rejected him for a 4 year term as a state Supreme Court justice, why should he be rewarded by being appointed to a lifetime federal judgeship?
“Before being appointed SCOTX justice, Sullivan served the state as deputy counsel for Texas Governor Greg Abbott, having previously served under (then- attorney general) Abbott as assistant solicitor general”
No notable achievements mentioned in his career as an Abbott staffer or Scotx justice mentioned in his wiki bio
Justice James Sullivan has served honorably on the Texas Supreme Court. Senator Cruz and I previously advanced him for the federal bench after he earned high marks from the bipartisan Federal Judicial Evaluation Committee we established to vet Texas nominees. An election result does not diminish a record of ability and integrity. He should be confirmed. https://t.co/h6eiek5c7R
今のネタニヤフの悲壮な状況を見るにつけ、「ついにあのネタニヤフも終わりかぁ」と思う人も少なくないと思いますが、個人的には、2021年6月の退陣時にもイスラエル中に歓喜の声を感情を取材し、1年中、デモの人たちが着ていたCrime Minister Tシャツを記念に買いましたが、その1年半後にはダークサイドから蘇ったアナキンのように暗黒化して(極右と組んで)復権したので、ネタニヤフが下野して5年くらい経たないと、ネタニヤフ時代が終わったとは思えません。