Justice Roberts…
Protected birthright citizenship.
Saved unconstitutional Obamacare.
Protected Dobbs leaker Sheldon Snook.
Appointed Boasberg to preside over the FISA Court.
Protected fake Ukraine impeachment whistleblower Eric Ciamarella.
Roberts runs the judicial coup.
The reason Amy Coney Barrett felt free to go rogue: she faces no blowback or penalty from the Right.
Take a page from the Left.
Trump should cancel her. At every level.
Investigate her.
Her book contract.
Her law clerks.
Her money.
Make an example.
Tomorrow Barrett will publish her argument that a Chinese Communist party member who flies to Guam so he and his wife can deliver their baby, who then take their child to be raised in China, will be eligible to be President of the United states 35 years later
The SCOTUS ruling on mail-in ballots being allowed AFTER Election Day
is complete vindication for our work to pass the SAVE America Act
& only makes the way I was treated in South Dakota look even more profoundly unfair.
The timing is impeccable.
It’s almost poetic.
So, basically, we just learned that if a state passes a law to accept mail-in ballots weeks after Election Day,
SCOTUS will uphold the law.
This is how our country dies.
Summary of today's Supreme Court rulings:
1. "Election Day" doesn't mean "Election Day."
2. The President has the Article II power to fire FTC commissioners.
3. But not Fed governors. (Because apparently, we have a Fourth Branch of government.)
🇺🇸🔥Amid the devastation left behind by the #CottonwoodFire in Beaver County, one sight stopped a crew working on the mountain in their tracks.
A viewer shared this video after her husband and a co-worker found a small patch of trees where everything around it had burned, right up to an American flag.
The flag was still standing, untouched.
Whether you see it as a symbol of hope, resilience or simply one of those remarkable moments nature sometimes leaves behind, it's an incredible sight in the middle of so much loss, especially as we approach Independence Day during America's 250th anniversary celebration.
@KUTV2News
Thanks for sharing your videos
The New York Times accidentally told the truth when it cried that the Supreme Court is “unshackling the presidency.”
Unshackling.
Interesting word.
Because that means they know the presidency was shackled.
The question is: by whom?
Not the voters.
Not Congress.
Not the Constitution.
No, the “shackles” were the entire unelected anti-Trump containment system: activist judges, permanent bureaucrats, NGO lawyers, blue-state attorneys general, media stenographers, and the rest of the courthouse Resistance industry that decided executive power was legitimate only when Democrats controlled it.
When Obama stretched authority, it was “historic leadership.”
When Biden ignored borders, loans, mandates, and emergency limits, it was “saving democracy.”
But when Trump enforces immigration law, ends “temporary” status that somehow lasted longer than most Hollywood marriages, and tells DHS to do its actual job?
Suddenly the presidency is too powerful.
Suddenly courts must intervene.
Suddenly the Founders apparently intended America to be governed by district judges in Boston, nonprofit asylum mills, and New York Times guest essayists hyperventilating into their oat milk.
That is why they are panicking.
SCOTUS is not creating a dictatorship.
It is exposing the dictatorship of the veto class.
The people who spent years using lawfare to restrain one elected president are now horrified that the Supreme Court may be cutting through their fake restraints.
The “shackles” were never constitutional guardrails.
They were political handcuffs.
And the left loved them because they only snapped shut in one direction.
Now the chains are breaking.
And the same media that cheered every injunction is suddenly terrified that Trump may have turned their lawfare machine into his legal armor.
(article below)