🚨NEW VIDEO 🚨
President Biden’s judicial nominees are unfit and unqualified to serve.
Americans deserve the best legal minds upholding the rule of law and defending the Constitution on the federal bench – and they are not getting that with President Biden’s judicial nominees.
The recent allegations against Graham Platner and the media's double standard are confirming what we already knew: the smear campaign against Justice Kavanaugh was never about protecting women.
The Left was willing to spread relentless lies to achieve its political ends.
The Left isn’t calling to pack the Supreme Court to protect the nation’s highest court. Packing the Court would undermine its judicial independence.
Senator @ChuckGrassley is right to warn that these calls are aimed at advancing the Left's radical agenda, not safeguarding the judiciary.
With mounting threats against the justices and the recent swatting attempt at Justice Amy Coney Barrett's home, this kind of rhetoric is irresponsible.
We must lower the temperature and respect the justices who faithfully serve the American people before someone gets hurt.
Must Watch: Senator @ChuckGrassley gives a history lesson on Democrats’ efforts to pack the Supreme Court.
It was a bad idea when FDR proposed it in 1937, and it remains a bad idea today.
Justice Clarence Thomas is one of the greatest justices to ever serve on the Supreme Court.
Justice Thomas is unwavering in his principles and steadfast in his commitment to upholding the Constitution, even in the moments when he was in the minority on issues that came before the Court.
“Since joining the Court in 1991, Thomas has pulled the Court’s jurisprudence back to the Constitution’s original meaning and steered the Court itself back to its proper role. At the start of his tenure, Thomas laid out a jurisprudence that started with lone dissents, but over time, he has swayed the Court in his direction. Those principled dissents became concurrences and are now majority opinions.” - @MarkPaoletta
https://t.co/pFFG2XElfr
The Left isn’t calling to pack the Supreme Court to protect the nation’s highest court. Packing the Court would undermine its judicial independence.
Senator @ChuckGrassley is right to warn that these calls are aimed at advancing the Left's radical agenda, not safeguarding the judiciary.
Must Read: The Supreme Court Must Rein in Colorado’s Climate Lawfare
“If Boulder’s lawsuit succeeds, local officials in one affluent community will exercise extraordinary influence over other states, particularly states whose workforces and public finances depend heavily on fossil fuels. Horizontal federalism forbids the kind of favoritism in which some states, to paraphrase Animal Farm, become more equal than others.” - @ishapiro
https://t.co/YmjH4lMTuk
"Americans are free to disagree with the Supreme Court. They are free to criticize its decisions. What they are not entitled to do is threaten judges' families or sabotage their livelihoods because they dislike the outcome of a case." -@mike_frags
https://t.co/5HL7ThqqyZ
Saying that the Supreme Court “committed violence” in its ruling, which you disagree with for political reasons, is exactly the type of hyperbolic rhetoric that has put several of the justices in harm’s way.
We’re still waiting on the NYT to report on the swatting incident at Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s home...
Must Read: Sneaky leftist lawsuits are taking aim at US energy dominance
"The justices should shut down Boulder’s end-run on the Constitution and reaffirm the basic principle that the nation’s energy policy can’t be dictated by local lawsuits."
https://t.co/04P9q1WGBJ