@Sevilla_Almu@mardelgiu@Renee_B_Adams@erinhengel Great graphic. So right about looking at effect size. See also altruism, risk taking. Caution. Actual evidence continues to be needed, over and over.
@PaddyTofu As I see it, it’s about centralised control. This explanation will chill an anarchist’s soul. https://t.co/W2yWqCEnIO The digital currencies that matter from TheEconomist
A brilliant example of fine methodology for handling the reality of survey non-response, from an interdisciplinary centre to watch at #EUSP.
https://t.co/N3CBRt7nJt
@causalinf Before the collapse of the USSR, CIA economists engaged actively in the profession. They were widely discredited, as was much Sovietology, for missing vital signs of impending collapse. This is still contested.
https://t.co/DORlKws8VF is a great read .....
@ChrisJGerry Not disagreeing but ...
“Only about half of U.S. adults surveyed late last year said they were certain or very likely to get a Covid-19 vaccine, according to a new report from by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”
@TimHarford https://t.co/GtQMDDuZnk
As this acknowledges, it’s not the original Evernote and has a much steeper learning curve. I stall on it unless I switch into first gear.
Does Dawkins think this is science??? I write as someone who advocates an open-minded, genuinely scientific approach to thr “nature or nurture” debate, disturbed by the light-minded approach to this hard question.
“I’ve had parents tell me their boys, upon being given dolls, will sling them around mercilessly by the hair, as though they are a weapon. Girls will arrange toy trucks into a family and tuck them into bed.” The End of Gender, by Debra Soh.
Monkey infants do something similar.