We are not giving up guys
I hope you know antis are still encouraging themselves to push their own hashtags
Let’s push ours.
RM WE LOVE YOU
RM NEVER WALKS ALONE
WE SUPPORT RM FOREVER
#RMIsNotAlone#WeStandWithRM#WeSupportRM#WeTrustInNamjoon
sizin aksinize ben namjoona gercekten uzuluyorum. soz konusu kendisi oldugunda destek vermeyen ilk firsatta kamyon altina atan bi fandomu oldugu icin. bu adam btse ve bize 13 yilini verdi ama su an onun elinde olan tek sey nankorluk. ne namjoonu hak ediyosunuz ne de sevgisini +
Let’s be fuckng serious. @PixelProject
RM didn’t ask to be on your fckng list. He didn’t submit himself for your approval. He didn’t endorse your organisation. So acting publicly “disappointed” because he went to a concert in his private time is performative as hell.
And the hypocrisy is impossible to miss. Chris Brown’s 2009 domestic violence case was public and he pleaded guilty to felony assault against Rihanna. Yet Bãd Bun̈nÿ brought him onstage in 2018, and you still named him your #2 Role Model in 2024. But RM takes ONE photo on his private day off and suddenly your remember your principles?
The funniest part? Your own previous reasoning for recognizing Namjoon was his willingness to learn from criticism, educate himself through women’s and gender studies, consult a professor about his lyrics, and speak about gender equality.
So don't rewrite his entire history because one pic doesn't fit the narrative you are selling today.
You used Namjoon’s name, turned a private moment into public content, dragged ARMY into it, and then followed it with a donation appeal.
That isn't accountability. That's using an artist you don't represent to generate attention, traffic and money.
You don't get to monetize RM's name and fandom while pretending you are the authority on his morals.
Fuckng Clean up your own contradictions first.
You were never there for any of his achievements, but when it came to criticism, you’re the first ones waving the flag
RM WE LOVE YOU
RM NEVER WALKS ALONE
WE SUPPORT RM FOREVER
#RMIsNotAlone#WeStandWithRM#WeSupportRM#WeTrustInNamjoon
⚠️ ATENÇÃO! As fanbases do Namjoon começaram a levantar tags para ele.
Se você é ot7 e ama o Nam, as copie e cole nesse post.
RM WE LOVE YOU
RM NEVER WALKS ALONE
WE SUPPORT RM FOREVER
#RMIsNotAlone#WeStandWithRM#WeSupportRM#WeTrustInNamjoon
Namjoon, I’m so sorry.
From the bottom of my heart, I’m so sorry that you’ve had to go through all this shit. You never deserved any of it.
I genuinely feel like we don’t deserve you. You deserve people who truly understand you, respect you, and see you for who you actually are, not people who constantly judge, project, or pretend to know you without knowing the first thing about you or BTS.
I just hope that one day you’ll be completely free from all of this. Free from the noise, the cruelty, the control, and the people who have never even tried to understand you.
Until then, please know that there are people who see you, trust you, and will keep standing beside you. You deserve so much better 💜
Então deixa eu ver se eu entendi. O Bad Bunny pode ter foto com o Chris Brown e continuar sendo reconhecido pelo Pixel Project, mas o Namjoon foi removido? Ah sim, super coerente. Então o problema é a violência contra mulheres ou é escolher quem vai servir de exemplo dependendo da conveniência? Porque eu realmente quero entender a lógica disso😭
Cancel me. Block me. Screenshot every post I make. Tell people I am a horrible person. I dgaf.
But I refuse to punish Namjoon and Hobi for the crimes of another man. I refuse to punish them when I don't think they did anything wrong.
@_A3R1_@launfr Mas pensa, se eles se pronunciarem eles vão estar afirmando que apoiam as atitudes do artista que eles foram assistir, mas não é bem assim, se fosse, as armys que estão "decepcionadas" com eles não deveriam ir no show tbm,mas vão igual porque elas são "fans" sem o mesmo peso
“Eu ir ao show do BTS não significa que eu concorde com tudo que o Namjoon e o Hoseok fizeram.”
Mas você está há dias criminalizando os dois por terem ido a um show. Então eu te pergunto: se é possível ir a um show sem concordar com as atitudes pessoais do artista, o que exatamente diferencia a sua escolha da escolha dos Namseok?
Porque, segundo o seu próprio argumento, você pode prestigiar o trabalho de alguém sem concordar com tudo o que essa pessoa faz na vida pessoal. Então por que essa mesma lógica não pode ser aplicada a eles?
E, se você realmente acredita que prestigiar o trabalho de alguém que fez algo que vai contra os seus princípios te torna conivente, então, para ser coerente com os seus próprios princípios, o certo seria abrir mão do ingresso e não ir ao show.
Não dá para usar um princípio para justificar as próprias escolhas e, quando são os outros que fazem exatamente a mesma coisa, transformar isso em motivo para condená-los.
Se você pode separar o artista da vida pessoal dele para decidir ir a um show, os Namseok também podem.
Entende a hipocrisia?
The immediate backlash online against some of the BTS members J-Hope and Namjoon simply for attending an R&B concert and taking a picture with Chris Brown is a prime example of internet moral policing gone completely overboard. The toxic narrative trying to paint two grown men as suddenly "problematic" or "supporting abuse" because they met up with a massive musical contemporary is exhausting, hypocritical, and completely disconnected from how the entertainment industry works.
As a critic of this performative outrage, it is time to inject some reality and nuance into the conversation.
1. It is About the Music, Period
J-Hope and RM are, first and foremost, world-class musical artists, dancers, and hip-hop/R&B fans. Chris Brown, regardless of his highly publicized and heavily scrutinized personal history, is undeniably one of the most influential dancers and R&B performers of this generation.
•For J-Hope, a dancer who has dedicated his life to hip-hop choreography, witnessing the Usher and Chris Brown R&B Tour live is purely a matter of professional appreciation.
•Taking a photo backstage with a peer or a major global artist at a concert is standard industry behavior. It is not a political endorsement, nor is it a stamp of approval on anyone's personal mistakes.
2. The Hypocrisy of Selective Outrage
The internet loves to treat BTS like they live in an isolated bubble where they must maintain a flawless, untouchable moral standard that no other Western artist is forced to uphold.
•Major Western artists across the entire music industry including Rihanna herself, who later collaborated and reconciled with Chris Brown have worked with, hung out with, or publicly praised him.
•To suggest that J-Hope and Namjoon are uniquely "disappointing" or "betraying their morals" by taking a backstage photo is a massive, unfair double standard.
3. Grown Men Making Professional Choices
J-Hope and RM are grown men in their late 20s and early 30s. They are not characters in a curated fantasy narrative designed to perfectly coddle the internet's sensitivities. They are global music executives and performers navigating the real-world music industry. They have the absolute right to attend a concert, appreciate live music, and network with other major entities like Usher and Chris Brown without having their entire moral character assassinated by overreactive netizens.
The attempt to twist a fun, cross-cultural musical link-up into a narrative about condoning domestic violence is an Olympic-level stretch. It is entirely possible to separate an artist's personal past from their professional impact, and that is exactly what the Tannies are doing.
Todo mundo aqui é grande o suficiente para saber os riscos que podem correr em fazer algo que claramente é perigoso. Não estamos querendo mandar ou desmandar em ninguém, fica da consciência de vocês.
Mas também não vamos chegar aqui e incentivar vocês a irem de "setor calçada" sabendo do risco REAL que vocês estão correndo fazendo isso no dia.
BTS announced their hiatus. When nobody expected them to. They fulfilled their country's national duty. Without hesitation. They came back after four years. People doubted them. Said they were over. Said the industry had moved on. Then they released ARIRANG. The biggest. The boldest. The most artistically ambitious projects of the year. Ended the Western Darlings.
And now they've chosen NOT to submit their music to the Grammys, taking a stand against a system they believe categorizes music by region and language.
That's power. Not chasing the industry.
That's how history is written. That's how the industry changes.
Não dou nem 2 horas pra minha tml estar cheia de kpopper falando merda, então já vou adiantar: só lembrem que os favs de vocês também são vistos como “alienígenas”, porque, PASMEM, também são coreanos e cantam em outro idioma.
Desistir do Grammy é valorizar o próprio trabalho e entender que sua música deve ser reconhecida pelo que ela é, não reduzida por ter uma origem diferente. Isso não é birra. A premiação sempre tratou artistas não ocidentais como diferentes e agora resolve “incluir” criando uma categoria separada para o pop asiático. Isso não é reconhecimento! é segregação com uma embalagem bonita. Se um dia o fav de vocês for empurrado para essa categoria e ganhar nela, ao invés de comemorar, talvez seja melhor se perguntar por que ele nunca foi considerado bom o suficiente para competir em igualdade.
armys just got labelled a ‘criminal organization’ like sorry the money we raised for children’s education, breast cancer awareness, the blm movement, unicef, multiple disaster reliefs, and many many more charitable causes came from the mafia lmfaooo