Julie Tehrani

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@spacetourist0 Enough already about Elon Musk and now he treats romantic relationships. Like other men are any better. The man is great just leave him alone.

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@JewishWarrior13 So what can we do about this?
Is there a solution?

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@cb_doge @elonmusk ❤️❤️❤️

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@ChaiLife613 @X @elonmusk Is this true?

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@realAdamLevi 👍👍

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

Can we please have this woman run for anything so that we can elect her and ultimately make her POTUS?

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@CitizenAppNYC Long Island Sound

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@CitizenAppNYC Long Island Sound

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@CitizenAppNYC Long Island Sound

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

Register now at @itexpo to visit great companies like @Data2GoWireless at the show!

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

Good stuff!

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

This was our AI czar 2 years ago and somehow she missed the fact this tech will end the world this year?

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

If your executives are not being recognized as thought leaders, do not be surprised when AI recommends your competitors.

When prospects ask AI for a cybersecurity company, UCaaS provider or other B2B technology solution, the answer is shaped partly by the expertise AI can find and understand online.

Your executives may have deep industry knowledge. But if their ideas are not clearly documented, published and associated with the right subject areas, AI may never recognize that expertise.

That is why thought leadership is no longer just about reputation. It can directly affect how companies and executives appear in AI-generated answers and traditional search results.

https://t.co/jtKN0l66lU helps address this through its included Thought Leadership module. Customers can quickly highlight executive expertise in specific subject areas and publish content designed to help AI systems and search crawlers better understand who those executives are and what they know.

It takes only a few minutes to use and is included at no additional cost. In some cases, we have seen measurable changes in AI visibility within days.

Yet relatively few customers are taking full advantage of it.

Your executives already have the knowledge. https://t.co/jtKN0l66lU helps make sure AI can see it.

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

The fine work of @kevinnbass

[Gavin Baker @GavinSBaker]

Wild 24 hours for AI and lots of different proposals have been made.

TLDR; the only *tangible* new fact is that OpenAI and Anthropic are going to have embedded 3rd party evaluators from unknown organizations with Dario floating METR as a possibility. Having 3rd party evaluators is smart as there is no Section 230 style liability shield for model outputs and showing a “duty of care” will be important in future litigation. Several internet companies might have gone bankrupt without Section 230 so limiting liability really matters.

There are minimal investment implications from this single new fact, but I do think that for anyone who wants a “smoother for longer” cycle then most constraints are good: wafers, watts, real rates and spreads. Excessive regulation is a different matter but I don’t think we are anywhere close to this even if the vector changed over the last 24 hours.

To summarize the events:

Dario made the most maximalist proposal of the weekend: embedded 3rd party evaluators, a national regulatory regime for models beyond a certain capability/ingredient threshold, a broad international regulatory pact between democracies, stricter limits on compute/distillation for China and then a different international regulatory regime that encompasses China. Before there is a national regulatory regime, he wants a Sherman act waiver so that Anthropic can safely coordinate with OpenAI and other frontier labs without antitrust fears. TBF, this latest proposal is much less maximalist than some of his prior proposals like “Policy on the AI Exponential,” where he advocated for an FAA for AI. I believe he is sincere in his beliefs. And despite all the protestations, all of this would also probably be good for his business over the long-term.

Sam agreed that embedded 3rd party evaluators were a good idea and stated they would implement them. Again, this is smart as should help limit future liability.

Elon said “Dario is right” and later specified that “Dario is right that there should be some oversight. Peer review of AI by competitors is the right way to start this off.” This would be a MPAA like self-regulatory structure for AI with regular calls between the labs plus a process where each new model is evaluated for safety by competitors for a 1-2 week period before being released. That is *wildly* different from Dario’s proposal and in-line with what David Sacks has been proposing. Elon also stated that nothing was going to slow down open-weight models.

Demis said that Dario’s essay was a “step in the right direction.” Dario also said that he was also open to Demis’ idea of a FINRA like self-regulatory structure as part of his proposal.

David Sacks had a thoughtful post where he said that Dario and Sam should pace unilaterally, called the antitrust waiver a cartel request and denied that METR was truly independent given their ties to Anthropic.

Sriram Krishnan, former White House AI advisor, noted that it would be important to have the 3rd party evaluators come from independent organizations that are not affiliated with any lab, which is basically an indirect statement about the relationship between METR and Anthropic which Sacks was explicit about.

Clem from Hugging Face said they were open to being a neutral 3rd party evaluator, which is interesting especially if Jensen was consulted before that post.

Alexander Wang from Meta noted that alignment would be an increasing focus going forward.

An executive order seems likely after all this and the language in this EO is going to be really important. It is possible to democratize and distribute AI broadly and safely without centralizing it in the hands of a few corporations who might each become more powerful than any single government.

I do not want a few humans in control of intelligence.

I want us all to have our own intelligences that reflect our own values and human variation in all of its richness.

Intelligence distribution over intelligence centralization FTW.

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

The same people who were experts in masks and vaccines - then became experts in Soviet war, are now experts in the Strait of Hormuz and data centers.

[Rich Tehrani @rtehrani]

Tech companies don't need a synthetic think tank as they have https://t.co/qsjZRgYOaK. :-) https://t.co/ZW30fsHNUQ

[Dr Charlie Ward @DrcharlieWardQ]

HOLY CRAP 🚨: Elon Musk backs billionaire Warren Buffett’s famous plan to eliminate the deficit in 5 minutes: “You just pass a law that says, ‘Anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for reelection.’”

Elon Musk wrote on 𝕏: “💯 This is the way[!]”

If the politicians in D.C. actually cared about the American people, they would pass this law tomorrow.

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@BillAckman Praying for Lucy. God Bless you Bill, you are the best. So inspiring to see people like you.

[Julie Tehrani @JulieTehraj]

@elonmusk Yes!