Catatonic

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@BowesChay Et la Russie n’a absolument rien à voir dans sa mort 🤔 Si c’est vraiment le cas d’ailleurs

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@AldoSterone111 Comme dans tous les labs biologiques du le monde 🤷🏻‍♂️ Vous ne comprenez pas la différence entre des laboratoires biologiques et des recherches biologiques à usage militaire. il n’y a aucune preuve de recherche à usage militaire c’était donc des labs comme on en trouve partout 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@DrNeilStone Il y a effectivement peut être une raison plus malsaine encore 🤔

[Pete @splendid_pete]

The real reason Russia is pushing the Ukraine biolab narrative is more serious than the propaganda suggests. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗧𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗶 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. As the old saying goes, accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself.

Russia claims Ukraine and the United States operated secret biological weapons labs in Ukraine. That claim has not been substantiated. The UN has said it is not aware of any biological weapons programme in Ukraine, and Ukraine has repeatedly denied developing, producing, or stockpiling biological weapons.

Ukraine’s facilities are publicly described as public health, disease surveillance, biosafety, biosecurity, and threat-reduction labs. Ukraine says it complies with the Biological Weapons Convention and rejects the claim that these sites were military bioweapons facilities.

Russia’s position is the opposite.

Russia accuses Ukraine of hidden biological weapons activity while keeping its own military biological infrastructure secretive and largely inaccessible to meaningful international scrutiny.

Russia inherited the Soviet biological weapons legacy. The Soviet Union operated one of the largest and most secretive biological weapons programmes in history. After its collapse, serious questions remained about how much of that infrastructure, expertise, and military research culture survived inside Russia.

Those concerns remain unresolved.

The U.S. State Department has assessed that Russia maintains an offensive biological weapons programme in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. Russia denies this, but its relevant military biological facilities remain closed, opaque, and shielded from independent verification.

Ukraine’s labs are discussed as public health and disease surveillance facilities.

Russia’s military biological sites are treated as restricted state secrets.

Ukraine’s cooperation with the United States was linked to biosafety, biosecurity, and reducing risks from dangerous pathogens inherited from the Soviet period.

Russia, by contrast, has a documented Soviet bioweapons legacy, current official compliance concerns, and restricted military facilities that outside observers cannot meaningfully inspect.

In 2024, satellite imagery and expert analysis reported major construction and expansion at Sergiev Posad-6, a restricted Russian Ministry of Defence biological research site with a Soviet-era bioweapons history. The reported construction began in May 2022, shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion and during the same period when Moscow intensified its claims about Ukrainian “biolabs.”

That timing does not prove the new construction is an offensive biological weapons programme. But it does make Russia’s propaganda campaign look highly suspect.

Russia demanded outrage over Ukrainian public health laboratories while expanding or upgrading its own secretive military-linked biological research infrastructure.

The strongest factual argument is not that every Russian biological activity is illegal. It is that Russia has no credibility accusing Ukraine of hidden bioweapons activity while refusing transparency over its own military biological facilities.

This is classic projection and deflection.

Russia turns Ukrainian public health and threat-reduction work into a fake Western bioweapons plot.

It shifts attention away from its own closed military biological sites.

It muddies the waters around biological weapons compliance.

Ukraine denies the allegations, points to peaceful public health work, and says it complies with international obligations.

Russia has a Soviet bioweapons legacy, U.S.-assessed BWC violations, secretive military biological facilities, and refuses the transparency it demands from others.

So when Russia talks about Ukrainian “biolabs,” the relevant question is why a country with closed military biological sites is trying so hard to redirect attention onto Ukraine’s public health laboratories.

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@BowesChay Elle a pas commencée mais les soldats ont commencés à mourir depuis un moment et puis les stocks geolocated ont plus que commencés à se vider 😅
Bande de guignols, plus vous vous agitez plus vous montrez que ça ne va pas fort sur le terrain 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@dom_lucre Donc c’est secret et interdit mais le mec se fait prendre en photo 🤦🏻‍♂️
Putain d’attarder, ce sont des laboratoires de santé publique et les US les financent comme tout ceux qu’ils financent partout dans le monde !!!
Il y a zéro preuve que des armes biologiques ont été développées

[Pete @splendid_pete]

The real reason Russia is pushing the Ukraine biolab narrative is more serious than the propaganda suggests. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗧𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗶 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. As the old saying goes, accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself.

Russia claims Ukraine and the United States operated secret biological weapons labs in Ukraine. That claim has not been substantiated. The UN has said it is not aware of any biological weapons programme in Ukraine, and Ukraine has repeatedly denied developing, producing, or stockpiling biological weapons.

Ukraine’s facilities are publicly described as public health, disease surveillance, biosafety, biosecurity, and threat-reduction labs. Ukraine says it complies with the Biological Weapons Convention and rejects the claim that these sites were military bioweapons facilities.

Russia’s position is the opposite.

Russia accuses Ukraine of hidden biological weapons activity while keeping its own military biological infrastructure secretive and largely inaccessible to meaningful international scrutiny.

Russia inherited the Soviet biological weapons legacy. The Soviet Union operated one of the largest and most secretive biological weapons programmes in history. After its collapse, serious questions remained about how much of that infrastructure, expertise, and military research culture survived inside Russia.

Those concerns remain unresolved.

The U.S. State Department has assessed that Russia maintains an offensive biological weapons programme in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. Russia denies this, but its relevant military biological facilities remain closed, opaque, and shielded from independent verification.

Ukraine’s labs are discussed as public health and disease surveillance facilities.

Russia’s military biological sites are treated as restricted state secrets.

Ukraine’s cooperation with the United States was linked to biosafety, biosecurity, and reducing risks from dangerous pathogens inherited from the Soviet period.

Russia, by contrast, has a documented Soviet bioweapons legacy, current official compliance concerns, and restricted military facilities that outside observers cannot meaningfully inspect.

In 2024, satellite imagery and expert analysis reported major construction and expansion at Sergiev Posad-6, a restricted Russian Ministry of Defence biological research site with a Soviet-era bioweapons history. The reported construction began in May 2022, shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion and during the same period when Moscow intensified its claims about Ukrainian “biolabs.”

That timing does not prove the new construction is an offensive biological weapons programme. But it does make Russia’s propaganda campaign look highly suspect.

Russia demanded outrage over Ukrainian public health laboratories while expanding or upgrading its own secretive military-linked biological research infrastructure.

The strongest factual argument is not that every Russian biological activity is illegal. It is that Russia has no credibility accusing Ukraine of hidden bioweapons activity while refusing transparency over its own military biological facilities.

This is classic projection and deflection.

Russia turns Ukrainian public health and threat-reduction work into a fake Western bioweapons plot.

It shifts attention away from its own closed military biological sites.

It muddies the waters around biological weapons compliance.

Ukraine denies the allegations, points to peaceful public health work, and says it complies with international obligations.

Russia has a Soviet bioweapons legacy, U.S.-assessed BWC violations, secretive military biological facilities, and refuses the transparency it demands from others.

So when Russia talks about Ukrainian “biolabs,” the relevant question is why a country with closed military biological sites is trying so hard to redirect attention onto Ukraine’s public health laboratories.

[Pete @splendid_pete]

The real reason Russia is pushing the Ukraine biolab narrative is more serious than the propaganda suggests. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗧𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗶 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. As the old saying goes, accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself.

Russia claims Ukraine and the United States operated secret biological weapons labs in Ukraine. That claim has not been substantiated. The UN has said it is not aware of any biological weapons programme in Ukraine, and Ukraine has repeatedly denied developing, producing, or stockpiling biological weapons.

Ukraine’s facilities are publicly described as public health, disease surveillance, biosafety, biosecurity, and threat-reduction labs. Ukraine says it complies with the Biological Weapons Convention and rejects the claim that these sites were military bioweapons facilities.

Russia’s position is the opposite.

Russia accuses Ukraine of hidden biological weapons activity while keeping its own military biological infrastructure secretive and largely inaccessible to meaningful international scrutiny.

Russia inherited the Soviet biological weapons legacy. The Soviet Union operated one of the largest and most secretive biological weapons programmes in history. After its collapse, serious questions remained about how much of that infrastructure, expertise, and military research culture survived inside Russia.

Those concerns remain unresolved.

The U.S. State Department has assessed that Russia maintains an offensive biological weapons programme in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. Russia denies this, but its relevant military biological facilities remain closed, opaque, and shielded from independent verification.

Ukraine’s labs are discussed as public health and disease surveillance facilities.

Russia’s military biological sites are treated as restricted state secrets.

Ukraine’s cooperation with the United States was linked to biosafety, biosecurity, and reducing risks from dangerous pathogens inherited from the Soviet period.

Russia, by contrast, has a documented Soviet bioweapons legacy, current official compliance concerns, and restricted military facilities that outside observers cannot meaningfully inspect.

In 2024, satellite imagery and expert analysis reported major construction and expansion at Sergiev Posad-6, a restricted Russian Ministry of Defence biological research site with a Soviet-era bioweapons history. The reported construction began in May 2022, shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion and during the same period when Moscow intensified its claims about Ukrainian “biolabs.”

That timing does not prove the new construction is an offensive biological weapons programme. But it does make Russia’s propaganda campaign look highly suspect.

Russia demanded outrage over Ukrainian public health laboratories while expanding or upgrading its own secretive military-linked biological research infrastructure.

The strongest factual argument is not that every Russian biological activity is illegal. It is that Russia has no credibility accusing Ukraine of hidden bioweapons activity while refusing transparency over its own military biological facilities.

This is classic projection and deflection.

Russia turns Ukrainian public health and threat-reduction work into a fake Western bioweapons plot.

It shifts attention away from its own closed military biological sites.

It muddies the waters around biological weapons compliance.

Ukraine denies the allegations, points to peaceful public health work, and says it complies with international obligations.

Russia has a Soviet bioweapons legacy, U.S.-assessed BWC violations, secretive military biological facilities, and refuses the transparency it demands from others.

So when Russia talks about Ukrainian “biolabs,” the relevant question is why a country with closed military biological sites is trying so hard to redirect attention onto Ukraine’s public health laboratories.

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@superficlaldoll Qui est fausse du coup 🤦🏻‍♂️😅

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@Theydoronrons @2Halumi Pour avoir travaillé avec ça n’a jamais été nos pires enemies, au contraire, même si il faut toujours rester sur ses gardes même avec ses alliés. Aujourd’hui par contre les US montrent clairement des signes inquiétant, meme si on n’est pas au niveau de la Russie 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@DogTurdCanada Les canadiens ne souffrent pas du tourisme alors que les US oui. Posez vous la question du pourquoi trump traite ses alliés avec mépris et peut être que vous comprendrez pourquoi les canadiens n’ont pas envie ´d’être traités comme des merdes 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@myabradshaw78 Vous ne vous remettez pas en question, pourquoi les canadiens huent ils le drapeau US à votre avis ? Trump a détruit 80 ans de relation diplomatique et commerciale avec l’ensemble de ses partenaires. Ils traitent ses alliés avec mépris et leur manque de respect, c’est donc mérité

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@f_philippot Fausse pétition à but de récupérer vos informations personnelles.

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@Ybavyb @RWalhalla @f_philippot Tout le monde n’y aura pas accès car protégé par le secret que confère un expert comptable. Donc seul la justice aura un droit de regard si il y a un besoin. Donc seul ceux qui ont une volonté de frauder peuvent y être opposé 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@AlbLeVert 😂 en ligne wahouuu quel scoop 🤦🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@splendid_pete Je suis français et Philippot n’est qu’une merde insignifiante, cependant ses discours touchent une population d’idiots non éduquée et est suffisamment significative pour tromper une partie de l’opinion. Il n’est pas assez intelligent pour se faire payer, c’est juste un traitre

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@SmolfSmolf7 Le concept du moteur à eau n’est pas une idée nouvelle mais dans son simple process ça ne marche pas pour propulser des voitures de plus d’une tonne. Ici vous parler de moteur à eau alors qu’il est question d’hydrogène avec une combustion, ne pas confondre

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@indeec1937 Et non c’est toujours complotiste rassurez vous

[Pete @splendid_pete]

This video was published in January 2020.

And that timing matters, because it shows Russian “Ukrainian biolab” propaganda did not magically appear after the 2022 invasion. Moscow had been dragging this corpse of a conspiracy around for years, especially against Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, and other post-Soviet countries that dared to cooperate with the West.

The video explains the U.S. Biological Threat Reduction Program as exactly what the name says: a threat-reduction program. Its purpose was to help partner countries secure dangerous Soviet-era pathogens, improve disease detection, strengthen public-health laboratories, and stop natural outbreaks from becoming regional security disasters. In Ukraine, the official priority was to consolidate and secure pathogens and help detect and report disease outbreaks before they became wider threats. The U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency also states that the work was peaceful, subject to export-control and vetting processes, and did not sponsor gain-of-function research or human experimentation.

The video also makes clear why Russia hated these labs: not because they were secret weapons sites, but because they represented Western cooperation with countries Moscow still treats like stolen property. Georgia’s Lugar Center is the perfect example. Russia smeared it as a U.S. proxy bioweapons facility, while Georgia opened it to international review. In 2018, 22 experts and observers from 17 countries inspected the Lugar Center under the Biological Weapons Convention framework and found transparency around its activities. Russian experts were invited, then refused to participate, because obviously the propaganda works better when you never look at the evidence.

So the Russian narrative is not “skepticism.” It is geopolitical sewage with a lab coat thrown over it. The same machine that calls invasions “liberation” and civilian massacres “staged” also tried to turn public-health laboratories into cartoon villain bioweapon factories. The goal was not truth. The goal was fear, confusion, and poisoning public trust in countries moving closer to the West.

The whole point of the video is transparency: these projects were not classified, scientists were encouraged to publish, international experts were invited in, and the work was described as peaceful public-health cooperation. Russia’s claim was the opposite: secret U.S. bioweapons plots on Russia’s borders. One side offered inspections, publications, and open cooperation. The other side offered paranoia, state media hysteria, and the usual Kremlin swamp gas.

This is basically pre-2022 evidence that the “Ukrainian biolab” panic was never a serious argument. It was an old Russian disinformation weapon, reheated when useful, then thrown into the invasion narrative to make Russia look like the victim while it was the aggressor.

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@Milajoy Vous êtes au courant qu’il n’y a aucune preuve de cela à part des affirmations de personnes qui n’aiment pas Obama 🤔

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@AlternatNews Et à juste titre car effectivement il n’y a aucune preuve d’un quelconque financement sur une utilisation militaire. Des lab financés par les US il y en a partout dans le monde et ils ne sont pas secret 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Catatonic @JulienJou]

@LerouxArthur10 Bein non c’est toujours faux, des laboratoires financés par les US il y en a partout dans le monde et ils sont pas secrets. Et il y a toujours aucune preuve d’une utilisation militaire afin de produire des armes 🤷🏻‍♂️