I err, therefor I am

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@MartinPaasi I second that

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@naflasco If you want wide door, out of heavy material, you need height, to make the support forces at hinges bearable, due to moment (F*L, weight*g*center of mass)

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@modelstrangers He is a genuine top human!

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@PepGuardiolan @colinpriestner Its the culture, which shows up like the youth sport among other things. And the culture might have evolved due to the geography.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@TheColdJack they should dig out the stone to move here away and let her figure out how to get rid of it. Too much public resources wasted to be so gentle.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@OttoMeri ehkä tuossa kuvituskuvassa on osa vastuksesta. Norjassa on pitänyt olla "Ninja warrior" selviytyäkseen, tämä ehkä näkyy myös kulttuurissa ja miksei vähän genetiikassakin.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@EN0CX I bet he would prefere to walk unnoticed. He had his fame-years, he still got the money, because of that he cannot live normal life, sad in a way.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@stats_feed So why making out with Ruzzia

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@Rainmaker1973 water molecules want to connect/bond with other water molecules, wet ground has plenty, dry ground has "none". Dry ground has capillary pores, which eventually wet due capillarity & gravity, so that next glass will empty quickly.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@BillAckman @BernieSanders @elonmusk @SpaceX Oh Bernie..

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@ramikurimo Ei kai(?) kukaan ole osoittanut että kyseessä on varmasti litium-akku, mutta jaetut mittaukset ja havainnot kaiketi osuu asiantuntijoiden mielestä hyvin litium-akkujen vastaaviin. If it walks like a duck jne..

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@Mericamemed Val D’orcia ❤️

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@jakubflow Janne (Ph.D) is just winning European Marathon championship, might look more strained.. Markus the sprinter, was national champ, but not close to European elite, more time to look good. Factwise: distance runners live longer and are healthier than sprinters.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@XaLaRa_Se_Lew also in Swizerland

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@JasonFitz1 could it be that back in the old days, people were more active in their daily lifes and basic endurance was better, so training could be harder from get go.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@LoreofRunning1 @LouiseMBurke Adaptation for every day life ( very low activity) can barely happen it that time, high level sport.. no change

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@Brady_H Its not the marathons, but the quantity and quality of the training. Train for marathons smart, but dont run them

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

@MartinPaasi harvoja (?) esimerkkejä valtiollisen omistuksen onnistumisesta vaurauden luomisessa.

[I err, therefor I am @JussiPitkonen]

koulun digitalisaatio --> huonommat oppimistulokset ?

[Ihtesham Ali @ihteshamali]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.