cant even reply to mels tweet. im taking days off social media. my coinbase was banned in early-mid january so i took contact to someone i gambled with 2 years ago and he would purchase crypto off me and send me the addys but ok. im not even gonna bother
@mmeluhdy Imagine calling yourself a dev and not knowing what an API is because his vibe coding AI didn't tell him... And the fact he threatened to kill me because I exposed him and got him banned on rain lmao.
@vinzos_official@raindotgg Does anyone take a Diceblox streamer serious? Advertising gambling content to children is like selling drugs to children. unethical pos
If you're a gambling content creator and bitch about losing your sponsored fills... Remember the ones under your code that play with real money. They have more at stake and make it possible for you.
If you bitch through every stream, pick a different career. Don't be a crybaby.
@coinbetscom@CarlosOMFG Their design looks exactly like what chatgpt spits out when you ask it to create a "modern tech design"... There is no way a dev sat and made that... and definitely no designer involved either.
cheap site = $20 hot wallet, $50 cold wallet.
@BennySlots11@mmeluhdy@OPgambling_yt And he got a new dev cause he didn't pay me... And the guy that he hired is known to create free battle scripts for his friends so they can farm creators... Aaand the guy threatened to kill me so that's fun.
What I would do to make chatgpt websites instead and charge creators for it... Purple or Navy blue themed sites with console log spam and generic next & tailwind.
@provablyfairorg@moonroll If you wanna have fun, I'd suggest you check out https://t.co/vzuk7cbhtk. Their provably fair is "linked" to https://t.co/8k7I5WZY4s but it's not signed which means they could be hand picking outcomes from a year ago that were bad and give that to the user.
@IdcMiki@mmeluhdy I don't know what cs sites you know, but everyone I know offer crypto withdrawals except csgoroll.
There's a reason a lot of sites changed their "withdrawal" to "redeem" because that's a legal loophole. Redeeming on-site "coins" for crypto. :)
@IdcMiki@mmeluhdy I ran out of characters to explain it. Consideration means you have to put money at risk to win something. You aren't putting real money at risk since everything is given through rewards i.e you're playing a game without any risk with the chance of getting prizes.
@IdcMiki@mmeluhdy Dev here. 😉 The site doesn't have to follow gambling regulations since there is no payment required from the users. You only require a gambling license if you fit 3 criterias. Prize, chance and consideration. (Consideration is payment)
🚨 CASE BATTLES are now live on our website! ⚔️
Put your Mel Coins on the line and face off against other players — winner takes it all.
Choose between 3v3 or 2v2, and play in Normal Mode (highest total wins) or Crazy Mode (lowest total wins).
$50 Giveaway - RT & Tag 2 Friends
I rarely criticize @Stake — it’s considered by most to be one of the most “ethical” crypto casinos out there. But there’s one issue that somehow no one talks about… and it’s a big one.
Their KYC system is completely flawed and dangerously easy to bypass.
All it takes is typing a few basic personal details and uploading any ID or passport that matches them.
No facial recognition. No verification that the person in the photo is actually the one submitting it.
In 2025, for the biggest online crypto casino in the world, that’s unacceptable. And this weak system is already creating criminals. Yes, criminals.
A gambling streamer named @AugustMMXXIII (Sponsored by Stake) has been creating Stake accounts under his own referral code, completing KYC using the personal details and documents of Indian citizens, without their consent. And once these accounts are “verified”, he hands them over to his followers so they can wager under his code and climb his leaderboards.
That’s not a mistake or a gray area — it’s identity theft, plain and simple.
Think about that for a second: Stake’s own sponsored creators are committing identity theft — and getting away with it because of a primitive KYC process.
But this story doesn’t end there. One of August’s followers — @EnablingTV — got struck by this scam. His Stake account, created and KYC’d by August, was banned. He can no longer withdraw his $200 balance, despite the account being flagged as “withdraw-only” mode. It is a bit of a weird situation because it does say that his Stake account is on withdraw-only mode, yet he is not allowed to do that either.
Here's my theory as to why the Account given to Enabling suddenly got flagged and restricted
1. August uses an Indian citizen’s ID for Account A → Stake accepts it.
2. He uses the same KYC again for Account B → Stake notices the duplicate during manual review.
3. Account B gets rejected, and Account A (Enabling’s)
gets flagged and banned in the process.
A sloppy scammer meets a lazy system.
Stake knows their KYC process is flawed. They could easily implement a facial-recognition system or use modern verification tech like other major platforms. But they won’t — because tightening KYC would mean fewer players, fewer deposits, and less profit.
So we end up with this: a casino that claims to be “provably fair,” yet allows identity theft and unverified accounts to flourish — until it blows up in someone’s face.
I’ll be looking deeper into this case with my team, and I expect @Stake to address this publicly. The current system isn’t just outdated — it’s reckless.
@BradenMackenzi3@Wasted_Wagers Lmao. You replied to my stuff and that's your counter?
imitation is the the greatest form of flattery that only the mediocre can pay to greatness ;)
So after @Wasted_Wagers decided to not pay on time and get locked out of his products, he now gets a guy that bots giveaways / own products to make a ChatGPT copy of my gamemode with the same XP system, rewards and affiliate based with API integrated.
How disrespectful.