Just in, Another husband brutally murdered by his Wife & her lover.
Body cut into 3 pieces & dumped in the forest.
Case solved after 11 months today.
Rabale MIDC Police, Navi Mumbai solved the case of Baliram Suryanath Kushwah (50), missing for 11 months.
His wife Sunita Kushwah (40) and her lover Rahul Dashrath Prajapati (30) allegedly killed him on Aug 9, 2025 because he opposed their affair.
They tried to destroy evidence by chopping & disposing the body in Gavalidev hill forest.
The brother’s missing complaint in April 2026 led to the truth.
Both have confessed. Search for the remains continues.
This is the reality men face. Marriage = high risk.
Crime By Women at its Peak…
Advice for husbands fighting a maintenance case.
Before spending lakhs on litigation, spend a few hours reading the Supreme Court judgment in Rajnesh vs. Neha given on 4 November 2020.
This judgment gives husbands several important safeguards, including:
>The wife must disclose her true income, assets, investments, bank accounts, liabilities, and standard of living through a detailed affidavit right at filing of the maintenance application.
>The court is expected to consider the earning capacity of both spouses, not just the husband’s income.
>Concealment or false disclosure of material facts can affect the credibility of the maintenance claim.
>Maintenance should be based on verified financial disclosures and evidence, not merely on allegations.
>The judgment aims to ensure fairness and transparency by requiring complete financial disclosure from both parties.
Read Part B and the Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities carefully.
Pages 30–37 are the most important—read them at least 5 times. Read the remaining pages up to Page 66 at least 2 times.
If you understand these guidelines, you will be in a much better position to identify omissions, contradictions, or non-disclosures in the maintenance petition and raise them confidently before the court.
Knowledge of the law is your biggest weapon.
Many remedies available to tackle..!
Stay tuned for more practical guidance.
A man allegedly makes a false statement—and the Court imposes ₹3 lakh, with a warning that it may become ₹30 lakh.
But when false allegations and fabricated statements destroy a man’s liberty, career and family, accountability often disappears. Men are arrested, jailed and publicly branded before the truth is tested—while proven falsehoods are frequently dismissed as a “matrimonial dispute.”
Why does a false statement attract punishment in one case, but become consequence-free when a man is the victim? Justice cannot have different standards for different genders.
#samayraina #supremecourt
Her mother asked her to get married.
She said, “I don’t want marriage.”
When her mother started searching for a groom, she allegedly found a darker way to stop it.
And that “idea” changed everything.
SOURCE- @effucktivehumor
Men are continuously degraded. But they can't complain. Because if u complain, u are
- a man-child
- an insecure moron
- a guy with male ego (as per Dia Mirza & Soha)
If a comedian degrades women like this, police will file FIRs and NCW will summon him.
Courts ordered the husband to pay ₹30,000 every month as maintenance for his child and house.😡
He thought the money was really going for that.
But his wife was cheating with her boyfriend in Agra. She used his court-ordered money to enjoy her affair.
Shameless wife. Useless courts.
This is the common game now: Women cheat openly, file fake Domestic Violence and 498A cases on husbands, and loot money through maintenance.
They use the child as a weapon to keep getting cash for years.
Courts help these cheating wives.
They force husbands to pay, punish innocent men, and call it justice.
The Agra viral video shows the real face — wives living double lives, funded by husbands they betray.
Courts have become anti-men factories.
They destroy husbands and reward cheaters.
Brothers, this is not maintenance. This is legal loot and court-approved betrayal.
Open your eyes before they trap and bleed you dry.
If you want society to unlearn the roles of woman - when it comes to cooking and cleaning etc. Then society should also unlearn that men are the providers. Pretty simple sis.
A woman said that she wants a man who accepts her as she is.
The matchmaker found a successful guy.
He was bald. She rejected him. It's her choice.
But the same women cry if men reject them based on weight, virginity, body count, and skin color.
Why is that?
This is how the Indian judiciary and police should learn from the U.S.👉
Crime has no gender. Punishment shouldn’t either.
In the U.S., a 19-year-old woman, Mackenzie Shirilla, was sentenced to 15 years in prison after the court found that she intentionally crashed her car at nearly 120 km/h, killing two people.
No “she is just a girl.”
No victim card.
No special sympathy.
When the evidence proved guilt, the law punished the offender even if she is woman
India needs a justice system where criminals are treated as criminals—whether they are men or women.
Equal crimes deserve equal accountability.
This judgement doesn’t mean a wife can’t demand or claim..
Your wife even claim Taj Mahal as if she is Mumtaz..
She will get it or not depends on you and your right attitude and mindset.
What action is planned by Maharashtra government against the women who filed fake details to grab the claims?
As per the law, filing a fake affidavit to get some relief from a govt office is punishable under the BNS law.
Relevant BNS sections:
• BNS Section 236: False statement made in a declaration which is by law receivable as evidence.
• BNS Section 229: Punishment for false evidence — up to 7 years + fine (judicial) or up to 3 years + fine (other cases like govt schemes).
• BNS Section 217: False information to public servant with intent to cause wrongful benefit — up to 1 year or ₹10,000 fine or both.
Will FIR be filed on these 92 lakh women who faked affidavits?
Why no FIRs and these women are allowed to walk away with just disqualifications without punishments?
The PSI is making her granddaughter empowered woman my making her learn car ?
Or making her learn how to break rules and be proud of it.
Now days we have sen several parents teaching their daughters to be proud of breaking laws and feel empowered.
This is just an example.
Ikka movie where a man accepts a girl born from wife’s previous affair in college time
The Bollywood now wants to normalise this trend and want men to accept this nonsense
A SIMP who ignored every aspect of the girl who was murdered..
He blindly believed a story what he thought as a father of a girl instead of a law degree man.
Read this to understand how biased and flawed the POCSO law is when it comes to consensual sex between teenagers.
Imagine a 16-year-old boy and a 16-year-old girl in a relationship who have consensual sex.
Both are the same age and willingly participated → The boy is still labelled a rapist.
If the girl later regrets it or her parents complain → The boy is treated as a rapist and faces punishment.
Even if the girl was equally willing and active → Only the boy is considered the offender.
But if a pedophile woman rapes an underage boy → She gets easy bail.
Real Case (Mumbai, 2025): A 40-year-old mother of 11-year-old twins and a school teacher raped her 16-year-old male student for over a year. With the help of her friend who groomed the boy, she took him to luxury hotels, gave him antidepressants, and called it “love”. Yet the court granted her bail.
Why is the law and judiciary so biased towards women?
If both are minors and the act was consensual, why is only the boy branded a rapist? Why doesn’t the girl bear the same responsibility?
Either make POCSO truly gender neutral
punish both equally or punish neither.
Stop destroying the lives of young boys in cases of mutual teenage relationships.
By getting married, a corporate woman has everything to gain and nothing to lose. She gets a free bodyguard, a coolie and an extra ATM card.
None of these are against marriage. Their only fear is, their in-laws. What if the in-laws become a liability on her free bodyguard and atm card?
All the ranting online against marriage is because of this.
A debate over Hindi vs English in Patna High Court :
> A judge refused to hear an advocate
> Because he was arguing in Hindi
> Most people would have stayed silent
> But he didn't
> He took his stand
> Explained that advocates have the legal right to argue in Hindi
> No shouting
> No drama
> Just law, logic, and confidence
After watching videos like this from Indian courts, it's easy to understand why so many common people lose faith in the system.
If a lawyer has to struggle just to be heard, imagine what an ordinary citizen feels while standing before the court.
We can feel the frustration of Prabal Pratap and that's why we all connect with him .