We have to remember the original Mercedes was a combination of Brawn, Lauda, Zetsche and Haug. Since then it had been hijacked by a group of charlatans in Wolff, Källenius and Ratcliffe, all of which have contributed greatly to the demise of the team
Only in F1 you will find fans saying a driver who never even got to the podium in over 10 years in the sport should stay, while the most successful driver ever should retire.
Sorry but I can’t take any of you serious 😂😂😂😂😂
‼️James Allison on Lewis Hamilton’s excellent #F1#ChineseGP Sprint Drive‼️
“I don't think the car is fast enough to do that on its own merits. I take my hat off to Lewis for doing everything well in such complicated circumstances.”
“I don't want to take credit away, it was a very well-controlled drive by Lewis, who got the most out of the car that day. It was nice news for us to see the car so high on the grid and then take it to the finish line in the same position in which it started.”
This is for you ✨TOTO✨, and for you ✨ARAMCO POWER RANKINGS✨
You thought CultLH were bad before Lewis went to Ferrari?
You thought CultLH were bad after the Ferrari announcement?
Just you wait until he’s driving a Newey F1 car towards number 8…
You’ve not seen insufferable yet.
🎙️| Lewis on IG : "From the deepest part of my heart, thank you for being here with me through thick and thin. Forever grateful, love you all 🫶"
#ChineseGP 🇨🇳🐉
Dear @fia@f1@SkySportsF1@andrewbensonf1
An example of why #F1 needs better stewards.
At the #ChineseGP, they failed to understand the difference between 'retirement' (art 55.3), used to determine DNF, and 'classification' (art 61), used to determine points allocation,
'Retirement' is defined in the F1 glossary, so how can stewards claim the 'language is unclear'? It is their comprehension skills, not the wording in the regs.
#NoMoreBS