#JusticeForNoelClarke conducted a thorough investigation into all the Guardian's allegations.
What we discovered was shocking, and casts many doubts on the credibility of the accusations.
Read our investigation here:
https://t.co/gKZrNOloXQ
OPINION: The Guardian’s coverage and my colleagues’ comments mean I don’t feel safe at work
An unvarnished look at the ugly side of being a Jew working for the paper over the last month...
https://t.co/8stsz3oTmo
@montysbiscuit @capn_katie_ NOEL CLARKE IS INNOCENT!
And the junior bigots in Doctor Who fandom are going to have to learn to lump it, because they are far to petty and small minded to ask themselves if they got this wrong...
They would rather Noel was guilty, what does that say about THEM?
@capn_katie_ Well well well, Judge rules Guardian is up for defamation for all EIGHT of its hit peice articles, next up will be deciding level of offence and how much they have to pay up:
NOEL CLARKE IS CLEARING HIS NAME!
https://t.co/I0rmRPo7pY
It appears that a lot of people really do need to start realising that they owe Noel some serious apologies.
The @guardian being caught out by their own lies.
Tick tock,tick tock
@PaulLewis I'm afraid whatever way you want to spin this.
3 weeks of 'investigation' where your 'journalists' simply either believed,without any proof or openly kept looking for people to dish the dirt they wanted,is NOT research.
You have been found out
Tick Tock,Tick Tock
@PaulLewis "The Guardian’s investigation was deeply reported and researched, and we intend to defend our journalism robustly"
Pleased to hear it Paul, because now this trial is going ahead on all those counts of defamation, have to pull off something very special to avoid big £££ damages!
So @BAFTA it appears you jumped the gun way to early.
Thanks to emails from those involved in this disgusting set up.
Apologies are due
So are Noel’s reinstatement and his well deserved award to be given back
@paulwrblanchard@guardian@NoelClarke A High Court judge has ruled The Guardian‘s reporting against actor Noel Clarke was defamatory.
Mr Justice Johnson said in a judgment published on Wednesday that each of the articles cited in the libel claim were defamatory of Clarke at common law.
https://t.co/pSCu9cKg9J
@paulwrblanchard This is the JUDGE saying this! "The fact that it is reported that the Police had not considered that the allegations emrited investigation suggests that there were not even reasonable grounds to suspect the claimant of the conduct that was alleged against him" BOOOM!!!