Nunya Beeswax

Mocking the Clown World we live in, I enjoy reverse searing your sacred cows. That's your fair warning. Peace out carnts.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@TheBritLad You always jump with a reserve chute!

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@pelisonlinegrat A

[katy 🌸 @KatyKray73]

You must listen to this speech by our PM.

One Nation has Anthony Albanese rattled. He has declared:

“Across the world, hard-right populists are on the march, peddling politics that is dangerous, divisive and downright dishonest. We simply must defeat them. We owe it to history. We owe it to the nation, and we will defeat them. They’ll say anything and do anything to win votes. Bend any facts, peddle misinformation and disinformation. Turn Australian against Australian.”

This man is a threat to Australia. He’s a liar and much of this statement is a reflection of his own leadership.

VOTE LABOR OUT!

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@pelisonlinegrat What do they mean "could"? Could?! IS!

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@mattvanswol That judge needs to face grave consequences!

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@slavicsalami @BasilTheGreat Conservative estimate one might say.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@Support_Pauline 👍🏻

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@BritisherPaz49 Soros etc money involved and election tampering.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@Joey1800callme Yes to holding a referendum phrased as such & a HELL YES to prohibiting Islam in any form. No Islamic faith to be practised, immigration, tourism, products. Remigrate dual citizens & revoke citizenship, no converts, exile for islamic citizens. Enough with tolerance.

[TheRoadknight @RoadknightThe]

The Australian Government - the people of Australia - is now more than one trillion dollars in debt. So, how did we get here?

First, let's look at what the interest on that debt is: $24-28 bn a year; $67-76 m a day; $3m an hour.

Imagine what $24+ bn a year could do.

But where did it all come from and how is it still rising?

Well, we could start with NBN blow-outs (out-dated before completed); Turnbull's absurd $444m for the GBR (did they build a giant parasol to protect the coral polyps from Global Warming?); the NDIS farce where you can get six-figure sum a year for being stupid, or "I've got mental health!" which is another euphemism for an IQ under 80, having ADD or ADHD like 90% of under 50yos seem to have; Snowy 2.0 blowing out from $2 bn to $ 40bn (yeah, we're looking at you again, Turnbull).

Now, let's look at some Labor classics just in Victoria: a billion dollars not to build a road; over half a billion not to hold the Commonwealth Games; North-East link blown out from $5 bn to over $25 bn; Westgate Tunnel from $6 bn to over $10 bn - oh, and a lazy $15 bn gone missing to corruption somewhere.

Then there's Sydney's metro $12 bn over budget. WestConnex ballooned from $6.7 billion to $10 billion. Cross River Rail in Queensland $2 billion over budget.

Just in major projects alone, as opposed to social programs: $215 bn annual capital spend with 48% failure rate means tens of billions evaporate yearly in avoidable waste.*

Now, let's look at the $30-40 bn a year on Aboriginal affairs that never seem visible, never achieve anything and have shown not to 'close the gap', with most metrics static or going backwards.

Up pops Albo in 2023-2025 with another $1.1 bn for Alice Springs alone - and for what? Not a single building built; no new services; kids still running rampant on the streets stealing cars and so on. It's simply throwing money around like confetti.

I've touched on just a few areas here but these people aren't capable of running a fish and chip shop - as ironic as that might sound.

If any of these politicians or public servants who oversaw these disasters were in public companies, they'd be fired, prosecuted for negligence and sued so hard every orifice suck up the universe like a black hole.

So why are we OK with this? Why isn't government efficiency more important?

Get the economy right and many other things fall into place: cost of living, general happiness, health and wellbeing.

Except, we just shake our heads again and accept the waste and corruption.

* https://t.co/14hu2QTYv5

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

https://t.co/3MlLl2J9E6
@johncleese
@BritisherPaz49 @TheBritLad @BasilTheGreat @Sargon_of_Akkad @GadSaad

[BostonTea @BostonTea84]

Roland G. Fryer jest rzadkim przykładem czarnego profesora topowego uniwerku, który dostał się na uczelnię nie za kolor skóry, ale za pracę naukową. Nie był oszustem, nie był plagiatorem, nie był obłąkanym mitomanem. Jego problem polegał na tym, że zrobił badania i uzyskał wyniki, które nie spodobały się władzom na uniwersytecie ani lewicowym aktywistom kontrolującym kampus. Mówimy tutaj o Uniwersytecie Harvarda.

"Jeden z kolegów wziął mnie na stronę i powiedział, żebym tego nie publikował, bo zrujnuję swoją karierę. Nie posłuchałem go i opublikowałem, i potem przez miesiąc pod moim domem stała policja, a na zakupy chodziłem z uzbrojoną ochroną. Kupowałem pieluchy dla dziecka w towarzystwie ochroniarza z bronią."

Groźby śmierci wysyłane przez lewicowych fanatyków to jedno. Drugą kwestią jest reakcja władz uczelni. Krótko po publikacji artykułu pojawiły się zarzuty, że Fryer flirtuje z pracownicami w swoim laboratorium EdLabs. Wytknięto mu "niepożądane zachowania o charakterze seksualnym" (głównie werbalne, w tym żarty). Harvard zawiesiła go na dwa lata bez wynagrodzenia, zamknął laboratorium i nałożył ograniczenia. Fryer przeprosił za nieodpowiednie żarty, zaprzeczył jednak zarzutom o molestowanie.

Nie napisałem jeszcze, co takiego odkrył Fryer, że rozwścieczył lewicowych cerberów politycznej poprawności. Otóż odkrył, że amerykańska policja wcale nie strzela i nie zabija czarnych częściej niż białych i że użycie broni przez policje warunkowane jest zachowaniem podejrzanego.

Tak, dobrze przeczytaliście. Tyle wystarczy, aby na Harvardzie chcieli cię zabić.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@Schwarzenegger 2nd worst arrogant Austrian ever, "screw your freedom"? Well fuck you ya hypocrite toerag & your POS app you ancient irredeemable cünt!

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@AngryCops Fucking do it! Scorched Earth! Normally grounded older sister thinks he did it or had an accomplice ie because the whole "how did he move on quick?!" So what if he did, doesn't mean he killed his 3 kids! Anything other than admitting ♀️ can be evil & PPD isn't a fucking defense!

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

A brief history of the Jason Arday controversy:
- A DEI university created a lie.
- Nathan Cofnas exposed the lie.
- The university suspended him for exposing it.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@BasilTheGreat Record your interaction with these invaders and police should they come bother you doing a legal activity. Cockroaches don't like light being shone on them.

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@Glinner Also referring to a person from Uzbekistan or Tajikistan by saying "Uzbek or Tajik" isn't racist either! Could we have some fucking consistency around here or is it the same double standards and two tier social lynch mob justice the UK & EU are known for!?

[Nunya Beeswax @JustinCasecu_NT]

@Glinner Honestly I struggle to understand why "paki" is racist when it's an abbreviation of Pakistani!? Imo you're just shortening a word first & foremost before tone. A black Frenchman saying "American or English" with max scorn, derision & mocking in their tone is not racism tho?

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

“This post needs to go viral – NOW!

So, as you might have heard, Australia’s controversial Digital ID bill was recently passed in Federal Parliament.

And no, this isn’t about logging into Medicare “more easily.” This is the wet dream of every power-drunk bureaucrat who’s ever fantasised about tracking what you eat, watch, spend, say – and even think.

Labor rammed it through with help from the Greens and Jacqui Lambie, while the likes of Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Matthew Canavan, Ralph Babet, Alex Antic and Gerard Rennick strongly opposed it.

Experts lined up to say it was dangerous. Legal groups shredded it. Privacy advocates screamed. The public wasn’t consulted. But they damn well passed it anyway.

This bill is not about “protecting your identity” – it’s about owning it.

Without a digital ID, you will eventually have no access to a bank account, cash, Centrelink, MyGov, flights, fuel, medication, voting in elections, and even receiving parcels in the mail.

And you can kiss goodbye to ever renting a home, owning a car, using social media, shopping online, accessing the internet at all, having a phone number, and buying groceries.

They say it’s “voluntary” – just like MyGov was “optional” until 10 million Aussies were forced into it just to access basic services.

Just like the COVID-19 vaccine was “optional” until those who resisted found themselves locked out of society for months for not being up-to-date with their boosters.

It’s coercion and blackmail with a friendly smile.

And now that this thing’s been jammed through Parliament, the tech giants are lining up like pigs at a data trough. They’ve already got your search history, your online purchases, your late-night Instagram habits, and every whispered “Hey Siri” or “OK Google.”

Now they get to attach all of that to your real name, address, and government-approved ID. That “anonymous data” you thought was floating harmlessly in the cloud? Not anymore.

Your Woolies reward card is now part of your permanent “consumer profile.” Your YouTube comments? Traceable. That shady dating app you thought was private? Good luck with that when your real ID is stitched to everything you do online.

Privacy’s gone, and it’s not coming back. And let's not pretend this data won't be regularly hacked, leaked, or sold to the highest bidder.

And when the system inevitably fails? One blackout, one outage, one “oops” from some contractor, and you’re digitally locked out of your own life, while some AI bot in a call centre tells you to try turning it off and on again.

The committee that was supposed to scrutinise this bill was a total joke. They ignored almost every expert submission, skipped past glaring privacy failures, human rights concerns, and technical red flags, and still gave it the green light.

It wasn’t an inquiry – it was a rubber stamp for the surveillance state controlled by foreign nations.

Every politician who voted for this has just helped build the scaffolding for digital tyranny. This is the infrastructure for a fully centralised, always-on tracking system.

They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re saying, who you’re saying it to, and how to shut you up when you speak too much truth.

This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple.

What we’re seeing isn’t some harmless upgrade – it’s China-style social credit wrapped in an Aussie flag, and you can bet the CCP is watching on proudly, noticing how we've finally caught up.

#GaryJMatthews