As I pointed out last week the Bucha massacre was blamed on Russia in 2022, but they had withdrawn over 24hrs before the bodies of civilians were placed on the streets.
Who really did it ??
Which places in Ireland will today have a nuclear target painted on their backs?
Government has signed "acquisition orders" with French weapons companies to acquire €400m five radar units. Where will they be installed? On the map below would be our guess, but surely the government will specifically disclose the locations to the people???
This radar isn't for Ireland's benefit. It's to warn Britain of Russian aircraft activity. If (or when according to the British military) the doo-doo hits the fan between Britain and Russia, the Russians will seek to nuke Britain and no-warning airborne attacks will likeliest be more effective than a missile fired from some base in central Russia.
By installing the radar in Ireland, we're putting a target on our backs, we're gifting Britain a massive military asset and we're getting "in the game ourselves"
Remember, we did have SEVEN Saab radar units (last image) which we have now quietly donated to Ukraine. These units were not a threat to Russia and provided effective radar coverage in the skies over Ireland.
🇮🇪🚨
Two muslim asylum seekers gang-raped a woman in Galway only weeks ago.
How's that for "growing agression".
All avoidable and all imported by succesive Irish governments under Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael.
One of the most pig-ignorant articles in Irish mainstream media this week, which fails to recognise the sharp reduction in prison overcrowding in past two months (it refers to 5900 in jail, this morning there were 5518), which renders Gary Gannon & Caron McAffrey (sic, McCaffrey) commentary moot.
It claims "so far in 2026, 277 people have been forcibly deported". However, based on the monthly asylum reports, we know that Jan-May 2026 alone, there were 278 enforced deportations of failed asylum seekers, plus we know from Dept of Justice briefing that there were 77 deportations of EU non-desirables. This article purports to cover the period up to 8 September, so the above figures will undoubtedly be higher. In other words, the figures cited are wrong.
Who knows about the other figures which it claims as original - number of detentions and median length of detention.
It detachedly refers to "a spokesperson" but we have no idea for what.
Journal should be ashamed of itself.