Justin Gerald

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Jedi_Paladin @HanifChaud37519 @Ragna868 @Raw_Combat_ If it is literally the law as you claim, come on give us the precise Act Section and subsection. Oh and any and all Statutory Instruments pertaining to such

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@farman4x It's 4
(√144÷√36)²=?
√144=12
√36=6
12÷6=2
2²=4

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@farman4x In essence it boils down to (7+8)÷5=3
(√49+2³)÷√25
√49=7
2³ is 2×2×2=8
√25=5
7+8=15
15÷5=3

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@heinz212 @Siya_22100 You are calculating what is either side of the '+' so on this sum calculating the '÷' first or the '×' first doesn't change the '+' part

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@drdennisdavis @Siya_22100 Think of calculating groceries or materials (even if your country has a system where sales tax is an additional calculation. Multiples of an item being purchased alongside other items. Quick math[s] says 5×tinned tomatoes is 5x its cost, not a direct part of adding cost of bread

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@DanRandolph3 @Siya_22100 21 in Octal

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Jwrutherford83 @Siya_22100 @AlexaBliz_ Only if you totally ignore order of operations

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Siya_22100 Even if you TOTALLY IGNORE BODMAS/PEDMAS you shouldn't get 16
BODMAS/PEDMAS with added brackets/Parentheses (4×4)+(4÷4) so 4×4=16 , 4÷4=1 so 16+1=17
But ignoring that in favour of a strict left to right would be 4×4=16 16+4=20 20÷4=5
So never 16 BODMAS/PEDMAS says 17 is correct

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@tek_sidhu @XAestheticwalls Any number to the power of 0 is 1 .that includes 0⁰ . So no, 0 becomes an impossible answer

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@XAestheticwalls (0⁰+0⁰)÷(0⁰×0⁰)=?
0⁰=1
(1+1)÷(1×1)
(2)÷(1)=2
It's 2

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Emily_53xl 4ª+4⁰=65
4ª+1=65
Where my methodology shifts from the conventional whilst still working is (65-1)÷4=16 . 16 is 4 squared. This means 4 cubed is 64 so the sum is 4³+4⁰=65 A is 3

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Im___maryam Multiple conversations has it as 5÷(5÷5÷5)=?
5÷5÷5=0.2
0.2 is ⅕
5÷⅕ is 5×5×1 (number diveded by fraction is like number times denominator times numerator) so 25

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@NoahNewman010 @demma2422 @justalazyguyy @kingkapoor72 @andyburnham Exactly. Many Sikh public facing Business owners aren't anywhere near as performative outrage as him and as such don't have this walking martyr complex that he has

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@RecursiveChange @justalazyguyy @kingkapoor72 @andyburnham Singh to the most part is a Male of the Sikh faith so not a distinct lineage in the way you puts it. Typically Male Sikhs are Singh Female Sikhs are Kaur. But since you playing that one you got issue with displayed bans on Ali's, Khan's etc surnames with familial heritage

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@metpoliceuk I mean

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@
@metpolice when the hell are you going to do your fucking jobs and fucking duly notify me

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@Im___maryam R²+r²=98 so 2r²=98 98÷2=r⅔ 49=r² so are we saying r is (-n)×(-n)=(+a) or (+n)×(+n)=(+a)? R= -/+7

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@NarayanMeg23310 You forgot the parentheses/brackets in your conversion. Should be (30-3²)÷3 which would equal 7. What you put because of BODMAS/PEDMAS equals 27 because 3²=9 and then 9÷3=3 come before subtraction from 30

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

@
@metpolice when the hell are you going to do your fucking jobs and fucking duly notify me

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

Who the fuck cares about hell. Never ending fire and eternal Damnation right now is a fucking upgrade

[Justin Gerald @Justin_G_29]

Okay then who is gonna Lawfully shoot an insane amount of ammunition into me on @grok expert advice. After all to y'all I'm never a person that has breaking points, I'm the one that should be treated far worse than even a target on a military dark opps (no official record)