@WEAZEL_NEWS99@Life20780@AdedoyinTweets@Abdulhadi_Pen It gets worse…
If you thought it was all crap .. here is proof in Sahih Hadith that Mohamed was actually doing what Satan had instructed him to do.. to exalt and prostate to the pagan Gods with the pagans, humans and jinns!!!!
@WEAZEL_NEWS99@Life20780@AdedoyinTweets@Abdulhadi_Pen The Satanic verses were abrogated in 622AD and replaced with Surah 22:52 that still confirms Satans successful interference in Gods revelation. … which if (again) Mohamed was a true prophet would never have happened!
Daif ≠ fake.
There are over 50 independent narrations of this incident. They are widespread and from the earliest Muslims.
Multiple weak but independent chains can strengthen one another, potentially raising a report to ḥasan li-ghayrihi.
Which is very much the case here. 50 reports is a huge amount!
No. The Qur’an nowhere states that the Torah or Gospel had been textually corrupted by Muhammad’s time.
It affirms them as still present and authoritative (3:3; 5:43, 5:47, 5:68), commanding Jews and Christians to judge by them. Verses such as 2:75, 2:79, 3:78, 4:46 and 5:13 accuse some of distorting words, writing false claims, or twisting tongues—but never declare the Scriptures themselves textually corrupted.
@WEAZEL_NEWS99 Look you are just wrong.
The covenant line is with Isaac. And Ishmael isn’t left out he receives a blessing… but it isn’t the covenant!
If God had wanted to include both lines in the covenant he would have said that. He didn’t.
If God was going to create the covenant through either line he would have said so. And he didn’t ok!!!
God isn’t “forbidden” to do anything, God is omnipotent.
God was very specific in his revelation … the covenant would go through the line of Isaac.
That’s what it says and it says what it means. There is no “maybe” Ishmael. 🙄
The issue isn’t that God couldn’t speak to descendants of Ishmael. The issue is that the Bible’s covenant of redemption runs through Isaac, not Ishmael.
Genesis 17:19: “Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac. I will establish my covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his offspring after him.”
The prophetic line continues through Isaac → Jacob (Israel) → the prophets → the Messiah (Jesus). Deuteronomy 18 says God will raise up a prophet “from among your brothers,” speaking to Israel within that covenant context.
Muhammad is traditionally understood in Islam to descend from Ishmael, not the covenant line through Isaac.
He also contradicts prior scripture and revelation.
He cannot be, according to prior revelation and the biblical standard you affirm … a true prophet of God.
@WEAZEL_NEWS99@Life20780@AdedoyinTweets@Abdulhadi_Pen The biblical standard for a true prophet is that they must come from the covenant line and not contradict prior scripture.
Mohammed fails both.
The Qran also affirms the Bible as the true word of God.
@Sinaylemma@ApostateProphet Same.
Just because I don’t hold their theological views doesn’t mean I don’t think they they have a right to exist and defend themselves. 100%
@ClockKnocker@MasterMaliq Same. The satanic verses … 😱
The biblical standard for a true prophet invalidate Mohamed.
You can’t affirm the prior scriptures AND contradict them.