KB13

Son of GOD here to inspire.

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@rdd147 @themarketsniper

[Elias Al @iam_elias1]

ChatGPT diagnosed 40 million people with a disease that was invented as a joke.

Not a real disease. Not a misunderstood disease. A completely fictional condition with a fake name, fake papers, and fake statistics.

And it told patients to see a specialist.

The disease is called Bixonimania. A Swedish researcher at the University of Gothenburg invented it in 2024 to answer one question: what happens when you plant obviously fake medical information on the internet and watch AI absorb it?

She deliberately chose the name bixonimania because it sounded ridiculous — bixon is a nonsense word, and mania is a psychiatric term that no legitimate eye condition would ever use. She uploaded two papers to a preprint server. Both were obviously fraudulent. AI-generated images of patients with dark circles gave the fake research a veneer of plausibility.

Then she waited.

She did not have to wait long.

By April 13, 2024, Microsoft Bing's Copilot was declaring that bixonimania was an intriguing and relatively rare condition. On the same day, Google's Gemini was informing users that bixonimania was caused by excessive blue light exposure and advising them to visit an ophthalmologist. Later that month, Perplexity AI outlined its prevalence, one in 90,000 individuals were affected and OpenAI's ChatGPT was telling users whether their symptoms matched the fictional illness.

One in 90,000. A precise statistic. For a disease that does not exist.

Every red flag was visible. The name was absurd. The papers were crude. The condition made no scientific sense. None of the AI systems flagged any of it.

They read the fake papers. They absorbed the fake statistics. They presented both to patients with clinical authority and zero hesitation.

Then it got worse.

Three researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in India published a paper in Cureus, a peer-reviewed journal owned by Springer Nature, the parent publisher of Nature itself that cited the bixonimania preprints as legitimate sources.

A real peer-reviewed paper. In a Springer Nature journal. Citing a fictional disease as established medical fact. Passing editorial review. Entering the permanent scientific record.

It was only retracted after the hoax became public.

Nature published a full investigation of the experiment. Alex Ruani, a health-misinformation researcher at University College London, called it a masterclass in how misinformation operates.

Here is the scale of what this means.

More than 40 million people turn to ChatGPT every day for health information, according to OpenAI's own analysis. ECRI, a US patient-safety nonprofit has named chatbot misuse the number-one health technology hazard of 2026. ECRI's report found that chatbots have suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, promoted substandard medical supplies, and even invented nonexistent anatomy when responding to medical questions.

Number one. Out of every health technology hazard that exists in 2026.

An April 2026 study published in BMJ Open found that nearly half of the answers provided by leading AI chatbots to common health questions contain misleading or problematic information.

Nearly half. Of all health answers. From the tools 40 million people use every day.

Here is the line from the researcher that cuts through everything.

The Bixonimania case is striking precisely because it was engineered to be so obviously fake. The real question it raises is: what is passing through the same systems that is not nearly so easy to spot?

The experiment used a ridiculous name. Fraudulent papers. Visible red flags at every level.

It was designed to be caught.

It was not caught.

The AI that told patients about Bixonimania is the same AI they asked about their chest pain, their medication, their child's symptoms, and their cancer screening schedule.

40 million people. Every day.

And nobody is telling them that nearly half of what comes back may be wrong.

Source: Osmanovic Thunström · University of Gothenburg · Nature · April 2026 ·

Link in the (comments)

[Francis Hunt - The Market Sniper, CMT (MBA) @themarketsniper]

" Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq."

Correction: The NWO/WEF controlling legacy families want the the Blackrock/Vanguard run NASDAQ ETF spigot of auto-buying to plug a liquidity spigot right up the rectum of the limp loss making AI business, masquerading as a Mars dream village creator, with a satellite internet company duct tapped on.

How many other exchanges could SpaceX listing on that suit if NASDAQ refused theindex inclusion rule? Answer NONE.

It's not SpaceX manipulating this Perversion it's the Rotschild family, making @elonmusk seem like such a sharp tough business operator.

It is a post listing ponzi-enomics strategy and liquidity support for a post hype vehicle of suppression to ensure an over valued, loss making entity, building an expensive tyrannical surveillance grid, that US Tech ETF investors are helping ro fund, by keeping an index included recent listing's stock pumped on dumb monthly cash.

[George Noble @gnoble79]

This is the most SHAMELESS structural manipulation of a major index I've ever seen.

SpaceX is preparing what could be the largest IPO in history.

Target valuation: $1.75 trillion.

That would make it the sixth-largest company in America on day one.

And Nasdaq wants the listing so badly they're literally CHANGING how the Nasdaq-100 works.

In February, Nasdaq published a "consultation" proposing sweeping changes to how companies enter the index. The timing is pure coincidence, of course.

Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq.

Here's what they're proposing:

A new "Fast Entry" rule would let any newly listed company whose market cap ranks in the top 40 of current Nasdaq-100 members get added to the index after just 15 trading days.

No seasoning period. No liquidity requirements. Completely exempt from the standards every other company had to meet.

Currently, new public companies typically wait up to a year before they're eligible for major index inclusion.

That waiting period exists for a reason. It lets the market establish real price discovery. It protects passive investors from being forced into untested, illiquid stocks.

And Nasdaq wants to throw all of that out. For ONE listing.

But the Fast Entry rule isn't even the worst part...

The real scandal is the 5x float multiplier.

Right now, the S&P 500 uses a free-float adjusted methodology. If only 5% of a company's shares are available for public trading, the index weights you at 5% of total market cap.

That's common sense. You weight a company based on what investors can actually buy.

Nasdaq's current methodology already uses total market cap rather than free-float for weighting. But for very low-float stocks, they at least had a 10% minimum float threshold.

Under the new proposal, that threshold DISAPPEARS entirely.

Instead, any stock with less than 20% free float gets weighted at FIVE TIMES its actual float percentage, capped at 100%.

Do the math on SpaceX:

If SpaceX IPOs at $1.75 trillion and floats 5% of its shares, there would be roughly $87.5 billion worth of stock available for public trading.

Under Nasdaq's proposed 5x multiplier, the index would weight SpaceX at 25% of its total market cap. That means passive funds would be forced to buy as if SpaceX were a $437.5 billion company.

But only $87.5 billion of stock actually exists in the market.

You are forcing hundreds of billions in passive buying into a $87.5 billion float.

QQQ alone manages nearly $400 billion. The total Nasdaq-100 ecosystem represents over $1.4 trillion in exposure across ETFs, mutual funds, structured notes, and derivatives.

Every single passive vehicle tracking this index would be REQUIRED to buy SpaceX at whatever price the market dictates.

On Day 15.

With zero price discovery. Zero track record as a public company. And a float so thin you could read through it.

So what this actually does is it creates a structural wealth transfer mechanism.

The passive bid from index funds pushes the stock price higher. That higher price benefits exactly one group of people: the insiders and early investors who own the other 95% of the shares.

And when lock-up periods expire 90 to 180 days later? Those insiders sell into the artificially inflated passive bid. Your 401(k) is the exit liquidity.

This is the fundamental corruption of indexing.

Indexing used to be brilliant. Low cost. Efficient. You were free-riding on the price discovery done by active managers. The index reflected the market.

Now the index IS the market. Trillions of dollars flow blindly into whatever the index tells them to buy. And the people who control the index methodology are changing the rules to serve the interests of a single IPO candidate.

The S&P 500 requires companies to have at least 50% of shares available for public trading. It requires 6 to 12 months of seasoning. It uses free-float adjusted weighting so passive investors aren't buying phantom liquidity.

Nasdaq is doing the exact opposite. 15 days. No float requirement. 5x multiplier on insider-held shares.

Every passive investor in QQQ, QQQM, and every fund benchmarked to the Nasdaq-100 should understand what's about to happen:

The rules are being rewritten to benefit IPO issuers and early-stage insiders, and your capital is the tool being USED to enrich them.

45 years in this business and I've watched Wall Street find creative new ways to separate retail investors from their money in every cycle. But usually they at least try to be subtle about it.

This one they put in a PDF and called it a "consultation."

What's your take?

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@ZssBecker May the GOD of Abraham. Isaac and Jacob. Jesus Christ. The word incarnate Bless you more than you can imagine.

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@izthisJudah Damn. Comments are wild. Y’all really don’t know this is 5 years old? Why is this guy trying to keep stirring the division pot. You’re ghey

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@Mr_Derivatives 5600

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@zerohedge @grok What does this mean?

[Edward Dowd @DowdEdward]

Concur.

[Edward Dowd @DowdEdward]

How’s this aging gang?

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@DowdEdward Nailed it!

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@John_F_kJr That’s not true. No one would care the same as they don’t care right now. There is enough information available for people to care. They don’t.

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@shipwreckshow I pray for peace & joy. 4you & your mind & your family in Jesus name. I appreciate you. I feel the same.demoralizing.Unfortunately. We have no other https://t.co/mfAlwrnweb were chosen for this&the only reason you know what you know and do what you do is because you can handle it

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@CryptoBull2020 Is this guy retarded?

[Francis Hunt - The Market Sniper, CMT (MBA) @themarketsniper]

What do you mean "Arrest kiddie fiddlers, blackmailers, rapists, co-ercion of politicians through honey pot traps. Stoinks are up! Talk about that! [Fiat debasements basically] "

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@realjoshuareid Psalm 94

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

Psalm 94

[NoLimit @NoLimitGains]

If you’re over 18 years old,

You can’t afford to miss this.

The next 6–12 months are the most important of your life.

Why?

Because the market is setting up the greatest wealth transfer in history.

Most people think the pain is over.

THEY ARE WRONG.

Stocks are still at the most overvalued level in history, and the stress is intensifying.

Bitcoin has not officially bottomed yet.

We are likely staring down one final, brutal flush.

If you are dollar-cost averaging here,

That’s not a mistake.

Bitcoin is currently one of the most undervalued assets in the world.

Accumulating slowly is a smart play to hedge your risk.

If BTC drops below $60,000 and stays there for a while,

I’m buying every day.

But do not fire all your bullets yet.

You need to keep the heavy artillery ready.

Because this final crash?

It will be the generational buying opportunity you’ve been praying for.

DON’T WASTE TIME.

Stack cash. Prepare your dry powder.

This kind of setup doesn’t come very often.

If you’re reading this, you’re not late.

You are early in the accumulation phase.

I don’t track prices, I track sentiment.

I wait for maximum despair.

That’s how I was able to buy every bottom and sell every top over the last decade.

When the real bottom hits and I deploy a LOT of my capital, I’ll say it here publicly.

A lot of people will regret not following me.

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@Cameronfous Wait. You started a new YT channel? I’m glad you posted this. Your ther YT has been ghosted. I didn’t realize you were putting up videos here.

[KB13 @KB13dotcom]

@themarketsniper These 🤡 are just haters Fancis. We love you. You have integrity. We know you are awesome. Thank you for being so awesome. I salute you. And I say thank you. I appreciate you!