@KaartikGor Poor surgeon, failed even on scalp 😢. When pilot was moved from plane to hospital now bandages, nor sticking vr present. Someone with such huge laceration will be bleeding heavily
@Iyervval Torah text prescribes stoning (skilah) as the capital punishment for male homosexual intercourse, while the alternative spiritual penalty of kares (divine excision/being "cut off" from the spiritual community) applies in certain contexts
A paranoid Modi Govt has gone berserk on @instagram - any content that is slightly critical of the Supreme Leader is being taken down. Even JOKES are not being spared💀
Why is the ‘most popular PM in the world’ so worried about what’s happening on Insta? Didn’t Modi say that we need more satire and humour in our lives?😖
As the narrative slips and the lies come out - expect more accounts to be censored / banned / blocked. @Meta not saying saying why the content got blocked - just that they are following local regulations 😬🥸
27 pages. All three ECs signed. One argument: "Everything was unanimous. Notes are just suggestions."
Let me tell you what those 27 pages confirm under oath, and what they refuse to answer. 👇
✅ CONFIRMED: Form 6 changed online in a way that "could be construed as an amendment"
✅ CONFIRMED: Appeals against voters filed by state officers, "not brought to the Commission"
✅ CONFIRMED: A senior officer redistributed work without Commission approval
✅ CONFIRMED: Both ECs wrote to the Cabinet Secretary to stop it
✅ CONFIRMED: IIT + IISc committee needed to verify ECINet even complies with the law
✅ CONFIRMED: 88 of 97 deleted Goa voters had to re-apply; as if they were new voters
Now what those 27 pages refuse to answer:
🔴 Why were 14 objections filed in 10 months by two ECs; if everything was unanimous?
🔴 Why did two ECs write to the PMO's building; if this was just a "suggestion"?
🔴 Why was EC Joshi refused information about the July order?
🔴 Why did the IT system block EROs despite the DEC writing it "cannot block statutory decisions"?
🔴 Why do 97 legally registered voters need Form 6; as if they never existed?
They called two ECs' written objections - "suggestions."
They called a statutory Form amendment - "could be construed."
They called a compromised voter database - "needs a committee to check."
Under oath. Before the Supreme Court.
14 objections. 10 months. 2 ECs. One system. Zero SOP. Unpatched vulnerabilities. 97 deleted voters. 50+ illegally transferred. 13 crore processed.
The affidavit doesn't deny a single fact. It just refuses to answer the only question that matters:
Who was running the Election Commission; if the two Commissioners weren't informed?
That answer isn't in those 27 pages. But it's all over the evidence.
@MumukshuSavitri You think affidavit submission is sufficient to defend alteration in form 6, taking away powers of ROs, deletions without BLOs for verification, IT head running without rules. Just wait few more months, you will see what unfolds