K.H.LIM

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

🔥‼️@SenRandPaul release of Dr. Ralph Baric's testimony marks another major turning point in exposing the scientific and institutional failures surrounding #COVID-19.
It also independently reinforces several key conclusions that we presented in the 1st Yan Report in September 2020.
https://t.co/E1y6EhVhWQ
1️⃣ the furin cleavage site (FCS).
- Dr. Baric acknowledged that the FCS was the defining feature that first triggered lab-origin scrutiny and testified that inserting such a sequence would have been his role in the proposed research. Whether or not Baric participated in creating SARS-CoV-2 is a separate question. What matters is that the public narrative dismissing the FCS as insignificant has collapsed.
- In the 1st Yan Report, we concluded from the beginning that the FCS was an engineered gain-of-function element. More importantly, we identified restriction enzyme signatures surrounding the Spike engineering strategy that were consistent with cloning approaches routinely used in work associated with Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Fang Li. The FCS was never "just another mutation." It was part of an engineering design.
2️⃣ the "ideal ACE2 binding" theory has now fallen apart.
- The Proximal Origin paper argued that SARS-CoV-2 could not have been engineered because its receptor binding was not the "ideal" design an engineer would choose.
- Baric has now testified that his own experiments from 2010–2011 demonstrated exactly the opposite: a virus that binds too tightly can spread worse, meaning a knowledgeable designer may deliberately avoid the strongest possible binding. That directly undermines one of the central scientific arguments used in Proximal Origin.
- This is exactly why the 1st Yan Report analyzed the engineering pattern itself: preservation of the critical hACE2-contact residues, deliberate modification of largely non-essential residues, and molecular cloning signatures surrounding the RBM. That is how experienced molecular virologists recognize rational engineering—not by assuming an engineer would always maximize receptor affinity.
3️⃣ Baric confirmed that a U.S. taxpayer-funded hACE2 mouse model was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and used in risky coronavirus research.
- This directly intersects with the synthetic route laid out in the 1st Yan Report.
- In that report, we explained that after engineering the Spike/RBM for hACE2 binding, WIV scientists would have used serial passage in hACE2 transgenic mice to drive receptor-oriented adaptation. After approximately 10–15 passages, such a process could enhance hACE2-binding affinity, infection efficiency, lethality, and viral fitness while stabilizing the engineered genome.
- But this is exactly where they made a catastrophic mistake. hACE2 mice are suitable for adapting an engineered coronavirus to the human receptor, but they are a poor model for evaluating human-to-human transmissibility.
By pursuing stronger hACE2 adaptation in the wrong animal model, WIV could enhance infection and pathogenicity while completely missing the explosive increase in transmissibility that the resulting virus had acquired.
- The 1st Yan Report specifically warned that, had they tested the virus in a proper transmission model such as the Syrian golden hamster, its extreme contagiousness would have been immediately obvious.
- My (May 2020) co-first-author Nature paper using the Syrian golden hamster provided the experimental proof. It used the correct animal model to demonstrate the extraordinary transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2—precisely the property that hACE2 mouse experiments could fail to reveal.
- In other words, the WIV's receptor-adaptation program may have driven the engineered virus far beyond what its scientists understood, while their wrong model concealed the transmission danger until the outbreak became uncontrollable in Wuhan (after intentional release!) at the end of 2019.
4️⃣Taken together, the larger reality is clear:
- the CCP exploited America’s open scientific system, technology, funding, and collaborators to advance its own strategic objectives.
- But only the CCP’s totalitarian state power, military-civil fusion system, secrecy, and geopolitical machinery could turn those resources into a weaponized coronavirus capability.
- The same pattern applies to AI, finance, law, and other American institutions exploited through unrestricted warfare. This does not make the U.S. government equivalent to the CCP. It means CCP-linked proxies, enablers, and compromised individuals inside open societies must be exposed, while the CCP remains the central organizer and ultimate beneficiary.
- Accountability must reach every person and institution that knowingly enabled this transfer and every CCP organ that directed, concealed, and weaponized it. The truth must be fully uncovered, and everyone responsible must be held accountable.
#UnrestrictedBioweapon
#ZC45ZXC21

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

【2026年7月24日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】
震惊！国会证据揭露：武毒所和解放军军事医学科学院在2018和2021年反复被美国海关查到走私冠状病毒相关材料！
https://t.co/ArS4TjYH5u

[𝐒.𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐘 𝟏𝟏𝟖 @Sherry1182]

福奇下周必須出席聽證，必須說實話，否則要麼藐視國會，要麼是做偽證
https://t.co/kzNteiXht2

蘭德·保羅參議員在媒體上預告：7月29日，福奇將宣誓作證，並被強制要求說出真相。
https://t.co/lYTRMC9wM0

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

Update:
Original DOI (Tech issues solved) + Affiliation: Yan Research - An Independent Research Team

1st Yan Rep
https://t.co/FLneTJDSOq
2nd Yan Rep
https://t.co/nMGUwKcYQp
3rd Yan Rep
https://t.co/e6Rlb4kFGJ
#UnrestrictedBioweapon
#UnrestrictedScientificMisinformation

[U.S. Central Command @CENTCOM]

U.S. forces started another night of strikes against Iranian military targets at 6:45 p.m. ET today. This is the 13th consecutive night of strikes aimed to hold Iran accountable and diminish threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to commercial shipping.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran promised an eye for an eye, and Washington answered with a head for an eye.

Iran's foreign minister opened with the old formula, warning that any aggression against Iranian infrastructure brings a decisive response.

Rubio, speaking at the ASEAN meeting in the Philippines, gave Trump's version: "a head for an eye," with Iran set to pay a heavy price.

That's the 20-to-1 doctrine compressed into a slogan, landing the same week the ceasefire got rejected and Trump said he's weighing an attack "bigger than ever before."

Writer: Daniel, Lucas

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

🔥‼️
@SenRandPaul
release of Dr. Ralph Baric's testimony marks another major turning point in exposing the scientific and institutional failures surrounding #COVID-19.
It also independently reinforces several key conclusions that we presented in the 1st Yan Report in September 2020.
https://t.co/E1y6EhVPMo
1️⃣ the furin cleavage site (FCS).
- Dr. Baric acknowledged that the FCS was the defining feature that first triggered lab-origin scrutiny and testified that inserting such a sequence would have been his role in the proposed research. Whether or not Baric participated in creating SARS-CoV-2 is a separate question. What matters is that the public narrative dismissing the FCS as insignificant has collapsed.
- In the 1st Yan Report, we concluded from the beginning that the FCS was an engineered gain-of-function element. More importantly, we identified restriction enzyme signatures surrounding the Spike engineering strategy that were consistent with cloning approaches routinely used in work associated with Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Fang Li. The FCS was never "just another mutation." It was part of an engineering design.
2️⃣ the "ideal ACE2 binding" theory has now fallen apart.
- The Proximal Origin paper argued that SARS-CoV-2 could not have been engineered because its receptor binding was not the "ideal" design an engineer would choose.
- Baric has now testified that his own experiments from 2010–2011 demonstrated exactly the opposite: a virus that binds too tightly can spread worse, meaning a knowledgeable designer may deliberately avoid the strongest possible binding. That directly undermines one of the central scientific arguments used in Proximal Origin.
- This is exactly why the 1st Yan Report analyzed the engineering pattern itself: preservation of the critical hACE2-contact residues, deliberate modification of largely non-essential residues, and molecular cloning signatures surrounding the RBM. That is how experienced molecular virologists recognize rational engineering—not by assuming an engineer would always maximize receptor affinity.
3️⃣ Baric confirmed that a U.S. taxpayer-funded hACE2 mouse model was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and used in risky coronavirus research.
- This directly intersects with the synthetic route laid out in the 1st Yan Report.
- In that report, we explained that after engineering the Spike/RBM for hACE2 binding, WIV scientists would have used serial passage in hACE2 transgenic mice to drive receptor-oriented adaptation. After approximately 10–15 passages, such a process could enhance hACE2-binding affinity, infection efficiency, lethality, and viral fitness while stabilizing the engineered genome.
- But this is exactly where they made a catastrophic mistake. hACE2 mice are suitable for adapting an engineered coronavirus to the human receptor, but they are a poor model for evaluating human-to-human transmissibility.
By pursuing stronger hACE2 adaptation in the wrong animal model, WIV could enhance infection and pathogenicity while completely missing the explosive increase in transmissibility that the resulting virus had acquired.
- The 1st Yan Report specifically warned that, had they tested the virus in a proper transmission model such as the Syrian golden hamster, its extreme contagiousness would have been immediately obvious.
- My (May 2020) co-first-author Nature paper using the Syrian golden hamster provided the experimental proof. It used the correct animal model to demonstrate the extraordinary transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2—precisely the property that hACE2 mouse experiments could fail to reveal.
- In other words, the WIV's receptor-adaptation program may have driven the engineered virus far beyond what its scientists understood, while their wrong model concealed the transmission danger until the outbreak became uncontrollable in Wuhan (after intentional release!) at the end of 2019.
4️⃣Taken together, the larger reality is clear:
- the CCP exploited America’s open scientific system, technology, funding, and collaborators to advance its own strategic objectives.
- But only the CCP’s totalitarian state power, military-civil fusion system, secrecy, and geopolitical machinery could turn those resources into a weaponized coronavirus capability.
- The same pattern applies to AI, finance, law, and other American institutions exploited through unrestricted warfare. This does not make the U.S. government equivalent to the CCP. It means CCP-linked proxies, enablers, and compromised individuals inside open societies must be exposed, while the CCP remains the central organizer and ultimate beneficiary.
- Accountability must reach every person and institution that knowingly enabled this transfer and every CCP organ that directed, concealed, and weaponized it. The truth must be fully uncovered, and everyone responsible must be held accountable.
#UnrestrictedBioweapon
#ZC45ZXC21

[糯米团 ⬜️ @nuomt]

【路德社】川普白宫表态：中共干预美国大选“他们在搞事，我们也在对他们采取行动”！一句“不是单行道”是要付出代价的，确认美已启动对中共的系列双向秘密较量的非公开对抗行动！7/22/2026 Candy
https://t.co/3n9gVYV7jh 来自 @YouTube

[C14 News | EN @c14english]

IDF fully prepared for military engagement with Iran, awaiting political approval

The Israel Defense Forces and national security agencies have completed deployment of all defensive and offensive systems. According to sources familiar with the matter, the military is fully prepared for another round of confrontation with Iran, contingent upon orders from the political echelon.⏳

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

I “didn’t work in WIV” doesn’t mean I “have no knowledge” about what happened there.
The revealed chat shows the compromised “Proximal Origin” authors can’t deny my scientific evidence in the Yan Report, but desperately need my ex-boss Leo Poon’s help (on behalf of CCP) to discredit me.
It’s a typical example of Transnational Repression!

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

🔥‼️@SenRandPaul release of Dr. Ralph Baric's testimony marks another major turning point in exposing the scientific and institutional failures surrounding #COVID-19.
It also independently reinforces several key conclusions that we presented in the 1st Yan Report in September 2020.
https://t.co/E1y6EhVhWQ
1️⃣ the furin cleavage site (FCS).
- Dr. Baric acknowledged that the FCS was the defining feature that first triggered lab-origin scrutiny and testified that inserting such a sequence would have been his role in the proposed research. Whether or not Baric participated in creating SARS-CoV-2 is a separate question. What matters is that the public narrative dismissing the FCS as insignificant has collapsed.
- In the 1st Yan Report, we concluded from the beginning that the FCS was an engineered gain-of-function element. More importantly, we identified restriction enzyme signatures surrounding the Spike engineering strategy that were consistent with cloning approaches routinely used in work associated with Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Fang Li. The FCS was never "just another mutation." It was part of an engineering design.
2️⃣ the "ideal ACE2 binding" theory has now fallen apart.
- The Proximal Origin paper argued that SARS-CoV-2 could not have been engineered because its receptor binding was not the "ideal" design an engineer would choose.
- Baric has now testified that his own experiments from 2010–2011 demonstrated exactly the opposite: a virus that binds too tightly can spread worse, meaning a knowledgeable designer may deliberately avoid the strongest possible binding. That directly undermines one of the central scientific arguments used in Proximal Origin.
- This is exactly why the 1st Yan Report analyzed the engineering pattern itself: preservation of the critical hACE2-contact residues, deliberate modification of largely non-essential residues, and molecular cloning signatures surrounding the RBM. That is how experienced molecular virologists recognize rational engineering—not by assuming an engineer would always maximize receptor affinity.
3️⃣ Baric confirmed that a U.S. taxpayer-funded hACE2 mouse model was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and used in risky coronavirus research.
- This directly intersects with the synthetic route laid out in the 1st Yan Report.
- In that report, we explained that after engineering the Spike/RBM for hACE2 binding, WIV scientists would have used serial passage in hACE2 transgenic mice to drive receptor-oriented adaptation. After approximately 10–15 passages, such a process could enhance hACE2-binding affinity, infection efficiency, lethality, and viral fitness while stabilizing the engineered genome.
- But this is exactly where they made a catastrophic mistake. hACE2 mice are suitable for adapting an engineered coronavirus to the human receptor, but they are a poor model for evaluating human-to-human transmissibility.
By pursuing stronger hACE2 adaptation in the wrong animal model, WIV could enhance infection and pathogenicity while completely missing the explosive increase in transmissibility that the resulting virus had acquired.
- The 1st Yan Report specifically warned that, had they tested the virus in a proper transmission model such as the Syrian golden hamster, its extreme contagiousness would have been immediately obvious.
- My (May 2020) co-first-author Nature paper using the Syrian golden hamster provided the experimental proof. It used the correct animal model to demonstrate the extraordinary transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2—precisely the property that hACE2 mouse experiments could fail to reveal.
- In other words, the WIV's receptor-adaptation program may have driven the engineered virus far beyond what its scientists understood, while their wrong model concealed the transmission danger until the outbreak became uncontrollable in Wuhan (after intentional release!) at the end of 2019.
4️⃣Taken together, the larger reality is clear:
- the CCP exploited America’s open scientific system, technology, funding, and collaborators to advance its own strategic objectives.
- But only the CCP’s totalitarian state power, military-civil fusion system, secrecy, and geopolitical machinery could turn those resources into a weaponized coronavirus capability.
- The same pattern applies to AI, finance, law, and other American institutions exploited through unrestricted warfare. This does not make the U.S. government equivalent to the CCP. It means CCP-linked proxies, enablers, and compromised individuals inside open societies must be exposed, while the CCP remains the central organizer and ultimate beneficiary.
- Accountability must reach every person and institution that knowingly enabled this transfer and every CCP organ that directed, concealed, and weaponized it. The truth must be fully uncovered, and everyone responsible must be held accountable.
#UnrestrictedBioweapon
#ZC45ZXC21

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

【2026年7月21日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】
Rubio东盟会议核问题咬紧中共，习共打死不敢谈干预美国大选；DOJ调查哈佛收中共资金，统战高官涉大麻洗钱曝光
https://t.co/pMpXhXMzB2

[洛洛克 @LuoLuo_Ke]

【路德社】卢比奥宣布21世纪核军控必须是美、俄、中三方框架！美国正拉俄罗斯重建全球核秩序，迫使中共公开核武底牌、接受核查与限制，否则将被定性为破... https://t.co/mPE3JAqJ2e 来自 @YouTube

[为自由而战，自由要有力量！ @XipingZhao]

【路德社】川普白宫表态：中共干预美国大选“他们在搞事，我们也在对他们采取行动”！一句“不是单行道”是要付出代价的，确认美已启动对中共的系列双向秘... https://t.co/sma7aYuuzW 來自 @YouTube

[𝐒.𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐘 𝟏𝟏𝟖 @Sherry1182]

川普警告伊朗：向霍爾木茲海峽任何船隻開火一次，美軍就摧毀一座橋梁或發電廠，包含德黑蘭設施 | 路德社 https://t.co/lxwOKUqU8Z

[为自由而战，自由要有力量！ @XipingZhao]

【路德社】卢比奥表示21世纪核军控“必须”是三方的——美国、俄罗斯以及中国，中共国跑不掉，意味着什么？7/22/2026 斯蒂文 https://t.co/xSjWW02XMq 來自 @YouTube

[糯米团 ⬜️ @nuomt]

【路德社｜路德时评｜剪辑】

国务卿兼国家安全顾问卢比奥抵达菲律宾出席东盟会议，意味着什么？
7/20/2026
@lude_media

7月20日，卢比奥抵达菲律宾马尼拉，准备参加与东盟领导人的会晤以及东亚峰会。
(https://t.co/8Iq0rzC5oZ)
同一天，早些时候，中共海警手持木棍突袭菲律宾海军士兵致其受伤。(https://t.co/8gjmetGE64)

卢比奥来菲律宾是件大事，表面上是参加所谓的东盟领导人峰会。但其实，卢比奥不仅有国务卿这个身份，还有一个国家安全顾问的身份，这意味着，这次参会不仅是外交意义，也是代表白宫国家安全团队参与。
卢比奥的能力有目共睹，所到之处，对中共势力的打击是片甲不留。川普总统自上任以来还未去过南美洲，只是卢比奥去了，现在南美洲一个个亲共领导人都倒台了，各国都陆续转向亲美。
菲律宾自1565年就是西班牙的殖民地，归墨西哥代管，直到1898年美西战争爆发；1898年美西战争爆发，西班牙战败，同年12月，双方签署《巴黎条约》，西班牙以2000万美元的价格将菲律宾割让给美国。所以，身为古巴后裔的卢比奥不仅对拉美手拿把攥，对菲律宾的情况很了解。

国务卿和国家安全顾问这两个身份，所能调用的工具是不同的。
➊ 二者的权力架构不同。国务卿只是负责做外交工作，能调动的只是CIA和大使馆。国家安全顾问，可以调用美国国家安全的最高资源，协调国防部、财政部、商务部、FBI、CIA、NSA、国家情报总监办公室，以及军方。

➋ 二者的职责不同。国务卿负责外交，目标是尽量不动用军事和情报力量，而是通过外交解决。国家安全顾问，就是军事、情报手段都可以用。而且，如果只是一个国务卿身份，会尽量不动用军事和情报力量，因为那实际等于说自己的能力不足，还得依靠情报和军事出手。但现在身兼两个身份，就不一样了，外交怎么处理，情报怎么部署、军事怎么部署，一个人就可以按照实际需求全部调用安排。

➌ 国务卿与总统之间还有一个环节是国家安全顾问，而国家安全顾问是直接给总统出选项的。如果国务卿需要白宫和总统的参与，需要先经过与国家安全委、国家安全顾问商量，最后才到总统。但如果是国家安全顾问，直接跟川普总统沟通即可。川普总统不是具体制定方案的人，都是国家安全委、国家安全顾问做好了方案：A、B、C、D，让川普来做选择。

所以，卢比奥直接到菲律宾开会，绝不只是一个礼节性地外交活动，肯定是有详细的方案和计划在执行，因为菲律宾有美军基地，现在中共又正在那里搞事，还被拿到了实锤证据。作为国家安全顾问，卢比奥可以现场决策，所以局势一定会升级，而这个升级不一定是24小时后，但肯定在准备中。川普说灭共产主义，现在其实所有的风向就转到亚洲、转到中共了。

#路德社
#LudePress
#LudeMedia

[Lee.W.H @lee_vx72665]

【路德社】｜ 閆博士説：

美反恐盯緊達扎克和WHO赴武漢溯源，“閆報告”關鍵證據獲印證！Trump放話：習共干預美國大選是引火燒身！7/21/2026【lude... https://t.co/cg4lAVx5Nv 來自 @YouTube

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

【2026年7月20日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】
美反恐盯紧达扎克和WHO赴武汉溯源，“闫报告”关键证据获印证！Trump放话：习共干预美国大选是引火烧身！
https://t.co/l3cvI682WS

[𝐒.𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐘 𝟏𝟏𝟖 @Sherry1182]

川普稱美軍正徹底終結伊朗擁有核導彈的任何可能性，預計最多兩周內完成 | 路德社 https://t.co/HpSosiCXL2