@JessMcF1 Would they rather win 5 WDC but everyone thinks they're overrated/won due to car OR Win only 1 championship but people think it's one of the best WDC drives ever.
@wearetherace What are the chances that this opens up a Wec "retirement" drive for Hamilton? I forgot one would get very excited for a Hamilton, Leclerc and Vettel car at least mans!
@wearetherace How do Merc save this? Sponsors must be looking at this and asking themselves "What has he seen?" Do they NEED a big name to replace him and save some face?
@DreHarrison101 Also never said that Visa wasn't big? But the name andretti and GM are both bigger in F1. Just find it mad that anyone can even begin to defend FOM in this situation. Its gross. its wrong. its weakened the sport.
Either way no bad blood here just I dont agree.
@DreHarrison101 Correct, because its a complimentary point on the BS statement by FOM. I'm arguing that calling your team Sponsor sponsor-RB with the management like "Oh yeah Rb isnt redbull" but not actually expanding on the RB whilst also merging with Redbull diminishes that teams worth.
@DreHarrison101 Yes but the issue with baby RB is different to Haas.
0 personality, 0 brand ID apart form the larger team. I also think 1 entity owning 2 teams is wrong and that the reduction in their independence weakens their "value" to f1. Its hypocritical and damages the sports credibility.
@DreHarrison101 I want both on the grid but I am using Haas (And imo V-CARB) as examples that directly contradict what F1 are saying ie Andretti bring no value.
What's the point of this franchise system if once you're in you can just let it sit, give 0 fucks, then tell others no? Its gross.
@DreHarrison101 No but for F1 to then claim that Andretti would not be competitive or bring value is BS. You have an American team on the grid who are uncompetitive and are not keeping up with the teams that are already ahead of them when it comes to infrastructure investment.