@STXAmbassador@gus26 When the Big 12 requires 1 OOC P4 opponent, who will Tech schedule if P4 leagues boycott them?
There is no P4 opponent in 27, 28, 29 and Arkansas in 30, 31 and 34 and Oregon in 33 could cancel.
WSU and Oregon State cant be used anymore if not already previously scheduled
@jasonfitz With no real game experience, no ticket sales, no TV revenue, no local revenue, no stats for awards, no SOS for seeding, no game film for NFL scouts, maybe even banned from Big 12 title game. Seems like a solid strategy.
@Vern_Funquist The Big 12 requires 1 P4 opponent (Oregon State was P5 when scheduled). It would be hard to fill out schedules in FB, and SOS in all sports, when P4 block it.
Arkansas in 2031, 2034 and Oregon in 2033 could be canceled in FB
@DonnellKolby@EMAWCaleb It might be hard to garner favor for his chnages if he becomes the villain. Or maybe by completely upsetting the college sports world, he will inact change quicker to stop actions like being done.
@17stra8wins@WestTex_Cactus@CFBKings The Big 12 requires 1 P4 opponent in OOC, but if no other P4 will play Tech, then what? Let alone the SOS of playing 3 G6 teams.
And other sports SOS will suffer as well if applied to all sports.
@DonnellKolby@EMAWCaleb But he is literally not playing within the NCAA rules. He is using a loophole and legal timing to advert the rules.
Whos to say a local judge just won't challenge the 2nd transfer if banned anyways? Maybe they need to be closer to home for their recovery of X problem.
@DonnellKolby@EMAWCaleb If they knew of a violation and played him still, then yes, penalize them with vacated wins and other penalties ($$, scholarships, post season ban, etc)
@DonnellKolby@EMAWCaleb Is that like watching someone drunk get into a car and drive and saying it's not your problem to stop them because the bar shouldn't have served them as much? At what point does integrity and standing up for what's right matter even if it's not your problem?