Lily

[Lily @KV_Lily]

Make sure not to vote for em!

[Lily @KV_Lily]

Hey students and graduates! The Republican Party just announced that they hate you. They saw the Democrats trying to do you a favor by forgiving your student loans, but decided that you didn't deserve it.

Meanwhile the PPP loan forgiveness program was twice the cost.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@DC_Draino Can we undo the PPP loan forgiveness program? Let's give the tax payers back the $757B that the government stole from us to give to PPP loan recipients.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@GedeSamuel @ValorINTEL @QueenBobsta omg did they pick you

[Lily @KV_Lily]

Ignore that I'm not a customer of theirs and haven't been for ten years. Ignore that I have no intention of being a customer of theirs and no desire to drink their coffee.

According to the precedent of todays two cases, I still have standing.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

Given the way the SC(R)otUS makes rulings these days I'm going to sue McDonalds.

Why?

Well what if I bought a coffee and what if they made their coffee so hot that it was unsafe and what if I spilled it on myself and gave myself third degree burns.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog I'll ask you this question for a fifth time then. If you believe this, why do you think the major medical institutions are in alignment here?

https://t.co/fBY1ftEMO3

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog Because "low quality" doesn't mean what it sounds like. It doesn't mean that we can't trust the evidence because it is poor. It means that specific preferred methodologies weren't used. Because they can't be.

41% of cardiac medicine is based on low quality evidence, for example

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog I really don't think you understand anything about the scientific process. You don't even know what "low quality" and "high quality" mean in this context with me explaining it to you three times.

It's more well researched than most medical interventions. By far.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog Accidentally posted the same screenshot twice, sorry, here's the second one

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog Tons of studies every subject include recommendations for more research on the question in a direction. This is how the scientific method works.

Just for proof, this is in the first saturated fat and first depression study I found on google.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog There aren't "so many studies" contradicting each other. There are a few thousand studies that show benefits. And a couple that show limited benefits. None showing harm. What conflict is that?

I explained that "high quality" requires things that are unethical to produce here...

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@Frankkoja93 @simonateba Can a grocery store decide not to serve gay customers?

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@simonateba That's so insane lol.

"Plaintiff": "I don't currently make websites on the basis of sexual orientation, but if I do in the future someone might call that act of discrimination an act of discrimination!"

SC(R)otUS: "Well gosh we can't have that"

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@leftistfiction @cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog You don't believe there can be evidence, and you reject all evidence as not being evidence. You can't describe what the evidence you're even looking for is because you don't have a good faith intellectual point. Just your feelings.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog I think there should be more research! But that doesn't mean we should reject current conclusions. That means we should operate with current conclusions, and continue doing more research.

Every study about every subject calls for more research. That is how science is done.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog I don't think you've proven anything.

Every study says there isn't enough research. You'll never find a study on anything ever that says "this is everything, we shouldn't do any more research."

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@leftistfiction @cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog Okay so thank you for admitting that you have an ideological position based on your feelings, and do not actually care about the evidence, and will deny all evidence based on your feelings.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@leftistfiction @cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog Okay let's play the game like this then - what would you consider to be evidence that trans people exist? I'll produce it for you.

Unless position is an ideological one you believe that this evidence cannot possibly be produced based on your feelings.

[Lily @KV_Lily]

@leftistfiction @cooIer_than_you @SYCK_GOAT @ErinInTheMorn @MattWalshBlog They spared millions of deaths in the face of a public who ideologically and intentionally flouted every last measure meant to protect lives...

An "appeal to authority" fallacy doesn't mean what you think it means. It doesn't mean "disregard expert guidance from expert bodies."