Joseph Lovell

To wage war on those who think differently unravels the fabric of a free society. "Those who betray the public trust cannot remain its guardians." ~Alan Jackson

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

Apparently some don’t want this up so I will pin it here.

https://t.co/m9qr0hsFG4

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@MauraM650547 @elonmusk @nikitabier @premium @Support Report the scam that X is enabling.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

🚨🚨So how is my fight with the bitcoin scammer on X going you might ask? Here is my most recent message to their special support staff on X: (@elonmusk @nikitabier @premium @support)

1. First, yes there is something you can specifically do and that is to let me follow back those who are trying to follow my lung transplant on my new account @KYMaverickreal . Over 650 followers I have from @KYMaverick1 have switched to my new account since I started it yesterday afternoon. I am unable to follow them back. Since I have over 4,000 people following the transplant journey I need to be able to follow back more than a hand full of them. I have personally apologized to them for not following them back because X is blocking me from doing so.

2. As to the other matter, I don’t think you recognize the gravity of the situation. There is a known account on X, namely @CC_Rachel_eth that is associated with the hacking of multiple (thousands) of accounts on X over months. Many of the targeted accounts have been high profile attorneys including attorneys such as @aburkhartlaw, @KenneyBaden. The bitcoin scammer next use their DMs to target other accounts including mine (@KYMaverick1). It is funny how both of the attorneys I mention have tried to warn X about what is happening and so far only @aburkhartlaw has managed to get their account back and X has taken no action against the scamming account. This account first attacks high profile premium accounts, then prey of their followers by DM.

3. It is also interesting that X refuses to verify the actual owners of these hacked accounts but is damn sure the bitcoin scam running each of those accounts is above board. Each of these hacks run the exact same attached ad as soon as they have access to these accounts. There would be no problem for X to immediately identify each of the hack accounts because they run the exact same ad and picture on each hacked account.

4. I have even offered my bank statement showing where I paid for the premium account, but this is not good enough because obviously the bitcoin scammer who hacked the account is more creditable after switching the email and password on the count. I even provided screenshots of X notifying me in real time of this occurrence. And that wasn’t good enough.

5. I am not threatening legal action, but it is inevitable if X continues to allow this one account to hack thousands of Premium accounts. I simply asked for the service address for legal services so I could notify someone that understands the significance of what is happening on X. I suggest you send this directly to attention of @elonmusk and @nikitabier so they can take action.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

The fact that 700 of my followers have found my new account in first 24 hours is encouraging. But X still has me blocked from following anymore back. @premium

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@scorpiomom1980 @Nerdy_Addict @X @Support @CC_Rachel_eth @KenneyBaden Thank you!

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

“Joint Motion to Dismiss Petitioners' Petition for Grandparent Visitation”

[MullenLaw @lauriemullenesq]

Update on the @KelseyCaterino grandparent visitation case. My guess is Kelsey’s mom and stepdad @BigWi111977 are no longer pursuing this case because they are in fact now able to spend time with their grandson, thereby making the Petition for Grandparent visitation moot.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@noahj316 As I said, whatever floats her boat. One can dream!

I suspect she will be there alone with her attorney and we might see some can kicking.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

Whatever floats her boat!

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@NancyMa39669861 It would be naive to think they don’t discuss cases around the coffee pot!

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

The Anti-SLAPP motion this morning is over. Short take: don't expect the case to be dismissed.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

As I mentioned on my previous account, when the judge behaves like Captain Ahab — obsessive, single-minded, and driven by a personal vendetta rather than impartial justice — you often end up having to accept rulings and outcomes that you would never tolerate under normal circumstances.

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌 O’Keefe v Read wrongful death suit

CF McCarty’s & Waterfall Bar and Grill-RESPONSE TO PROPOSED ORDER

A new filing has been entered in O’Keefe v. C.F. McCarthy’s, Waterfall Bar & Grill, and Karen Read.

C.F. McCarthy’s, Waterfall Bar & Grill has informed the court that it has no objection to the court’s proposed discovery order (Paper No. 157) and agrees to it as drafted.

While the filing is brief, it signals that at least one defendant is not contesting the framework the court has proposed for how discovery will move forward.

With CF McCarty’s & Waterfall Bar & Grill on board, attention now turns to whether any of the remaining parties object to the proposed order and how the court will ultimately structure the next phase of discovery.

The civil litigation continues to move forward as the parties prepare for document exchanges, depositions, and other discovery proceedings.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #Massachusetts #CourtUpdate #CivilCase

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@scorpiomom1980 @lauriemullenesq @premium It is another reason if you pay for SuperGrok, don’t do it through https://t.co/Ql8EBt6Dq6.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@obaileys @premium In a few weeks, I may be unable to respond.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

After an exhausting battle, I’ve started this new premium X account (@KYMaverickreal). I no longer have the time or strength to keep fighting X to recover my old one. My health must take priority now. @premium

Tomorrow before dawn, I’m returning to Vanderbilt. There are no guarantees I won’t be facing surgery soon. The path ahead feels stormy and uncertain.

To those who followed my old account and have found your way here — thank you. I need your help spreading the news of this new account as widely as possible. Please share it, tag others who may have lost track of me, and help reconnect our community.

Scammers have significantly reduced my reach and my ability to raise the critical funds I need. My fundraiser is coming up this Sunday, and every bit of visibility matters right now.

I’m walking through stormy and unknown waters. Your prayers and your support are what calm these waters. This exhausting journey has shown me I can no longer walk it alone.

Thank you for being here with me. For every prayer, every encouraging word, and every share that helps carry this message forward.

You are the calm in my storm.

With a grateful heart,

Joe
https://t.co/Tal8ZNFhyz

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@Alwaysyourmom01 @premium Not sure what good it would do. X is well aware of this bitcoin scamming account and apparently have chosen to enable it rather than protect their paying customers. This is not ultimately a winning strategy. @premium @elonmusk

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

Great News for Kelsey!

[Olivia @OliviaLambo_]

BREAKING: Justin Alyaian’s restraining order against Kelsey Fitzsimmons has apparently been dropped!

Amazing news! Congrats, @KelseyCaterino!

[BoozeyBeauty @BoozeyBeauty]

One of the strongest arguments from Karen Read's cell phone hearing centered on Special Prosecutor Robert Cosgrove's independence.

Alan Jackson argued that this case isn't about whether Cosgrove acted in bad faith or whether Karen Read can prove she suffered actual prejudice. Instead, he pointed Judge Doolin to two Massachusetts cases, Pisa v. Commonwealth and Commonwealth v. Ellis, arguing that the standard is whether a prosecutor's discretionary decisions remain completely independent both in fact and in appearance. Jackson emphasized that, under those cases, the appearance of a conflict can be just as important as an actual conflict.

Jackson then turned to Cosgrove's own statements from the February hearing. At that hearing, Cosgrove told the Court he wanted to meet with the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office to discuss "our various options," including whether "we" would return Karen Read's cell phone, move for reconsideration, or file an appeal. Jackson argued this was not simply informing the DA's Office of a decision that had already been made. Instead, he argued the language suggested Cosgrove believed those strategic decisions would be made together with the very office he had been appointed to replace because of an alleged conflict.

Jackson's argument was straightforward: if an independent special prosecutor believes he must consult the conflicted District Attorney's Office before deciding how to proceed in Karen Read's matter, then the appearance of independence has already been compromised. He argued that is precisely why a special prosecutor was appointed in the first place. If consulting with the DA's Office presents no issue, then why appoint an independent prosecutor at all?

One thing that stood out to me in the courtroom was Judge Doolin's interest in the legal authority Jackson relied upon. During the hearing, the judge commented that he had already read Pisa, specifically asked Cosgrove about Ellis, and appeared to be reviewing the cases and legal materials while counsel argued. Rather than focusing solely on the facts, Judge Doolin seemed intent on understanding whether those cases establish the legal standard Jackson says controls this dispute.

Judge Doolin took the matter under advisement, so we don't yet know how he'll rule. But this hearing made clear that the dispute is much bigger than Cosgrove's repeated use of the word "we." The real question is whether his own statements created the appearance that prosecutorial independence had been compromised under Massachusetts law.

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

Justice Service TV (@JusticeServedTV) just announced that restraining order in Kelsey Fitzsimmons is no longer in place! It is no more!

[Olivia @OliviaLambo_]

Allow me to reintroduce myself…

These are the FACTS of the case.

Excellent recitation and argument by Karen Read’s Attorney Seligson @DamonE73270

[Joseph Lovell @KYMaverickreal]

@lauriemullenesq That is how incompetent their support staff is. You warn them thousands of Premium Accounts are at risked by a known scammer account and they choose to go for coffee!

[Kyle Sharkey @KyleSharkey8]

H.A.M v Kearney & Read

DEFENDANT KAREN READ'S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF HER SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE ANTI-SLAPP LAW, G.L. C. 231, § 59H, AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6)
@suspiciousauce
@GrantSmithEllis
@MarburyvVeryMad