Something needs to be said here. I was an investigator in the elite CIA, Counter Intelligence Center, Counter Espionage Group, Special Investigations Unit, searching for a mole inside the CIA. I can tell you, first hand, Israel and the Mossad were one of the most dangerous espionage threats to US national security, following China and Russia.
🇮🇱 The Mossad-CIA Dynamic Nobody Talks About
The official story is that the U.S. and Israel are coequal intelligence partners. The reality is closer to a franchise arrangement, in which the franchisee has compromising material on the franchisor.
Consider the architecture:
- Israeli intelligence runs unilateral operations inside the U.S. at a scale no other ally would dare. Currently, over 1,000 operations within the United States! How about some transparency?
The Jonathan Pollard case wasn’t an aberration — it was the one they caught. The FBI has repeatedly identified Israeli intelligence collection against American targets, and each time the response is a quiet diplomatic note followed by nothing.
- The intelligence flow is dramatically one-sided. Israel gets raw SIGINT from NSA collection, satellite imagery, and human-source reporting from CIA stations across the Middle East. What does the U.S. get back? Curated, pre-spun assessments designed to advance Israeli policy objectives — not raw intelligence that would let American analysts draw independent conclusions.
- The vetting problem is structural. When Israeli intelligence provides “evidence” that Iran is weeks away from a nuclear breakout or that Hezbollah is planning attacks on American assets, there’s often no way to independently verify it. The U.S. doesn’t have the same human-source penetration of these targets that Mossad does. So the default becomes: trust Tel Aviv.
How the Game Actually Works
Sam Faddis laid this bare on War Room. The Fordow facility strike is a perfect case study:
Israel claimed Fordow was an urgent, ticking time bomb — enriched uranium that had to be destroyed immediately. The U.S. acted on that intelligence. Then, experts pointed out that the enriched material had likely already been moved. So what was actually bombed? And why was the intelligence shaped to force immediate action rather than verification?
This is the pattern. Israeli intelligence provides a threat assessment calibrated to trigger a specific U.S. policy response. The assessment may contain elements of truth — that's what makes it effective — but the timing, urgency, and framing are all designed to box American decision-makers into courses of action that serve Israeli objectives.
Bannon’s point about Mossad “running the deal” at CIA isn’t hyperbole. It’s describing an institutional capture where:
- Career CIA analysts know their assessments will be overruled if they contradict Israeli intelligence — so they self-censor
- Key liaison positions are staffed by officers who’ve built their careers on the Israel account — they’re personally and professionally invested in maintaining the relationship as-is
- The revolving door between U.S. intelligence and Israeli-linked think tanks and defense contractors creates a unified epistemic community that sees the world through the same lens
- Politicians who question the intelligence relationship get destroyed — primary challenges, oppo dumps, the full treatment
Why Section 224 Makes This Permanent
Here’s what’s so insidious about the NDAA provision:
Right now, the intelligence dependency is informal. An aggressive DNI or CIA director could theoretically demand raw sourcing, build independent collection capabilities, and recalibrate the relationship. It would be politically brutal, but structurally possible.
Section 224 changes that. Once you’ve got “data fusion” and “network integration” baked into law, with joint facilities, co-developed systems, and intermingled data architectures — separation becomes technically impossible. You can’t firewall your intelligence from a partner whose systems are structurally fused with yours.
Bannon’s framing is darkly funny because it’s true: why do they need a merger when they already have de facto control?
The answer is that informal control can be challenged. Codified integration cannot. The merger isn’t about gaining influence — it’s about making existing influence irreversible.
Why exposing this now matters for stopping it!
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Posts like this one (and the previous one) are exactly how controversial riders get attention.
That’s why:
- Rep. Ro Khanna already forced a vote to strip Section 224 (failed by voice vote yesterday).
- Rep. Thomas Massie has signaled he’ll offer a floor amendment when the bill reaches the full House.
- Groups across the spectrum (ADC, IMEU, Responsible Statecraft, plus libertarians) are flooding offices with calls.
The NDAA is still not law—yet. It’s out of committee but hasn’t even had a full House debate yet. Visibility like this raises the political cost and keeps amendments alive.
🔗
They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.
Actor James Handy, 81, Dead After Brutal Stabbing in California
Veteran actor James Handy, known for roles in Jumanji, Top Gun: Maverick, and The Verdict, was stabbed multiple times in the chest outside a home in Los Angeles County.
He was found unconscious and rushed to the hospital, where he later passed away.
Authorities say the suspect is his son’s girlfriend’s son, who called 911 stating, “I just killed the man of sin.” The suspect has been arrested.
@SchmukQatarlson Now that I am older and have experience in about 15 different fighting systems/styles, if I could start over as a young man I would make sure I had a strong base in wrestling and boxing.....
"A friend of mine who is a political activist said something interesting the other day, and that was for most people on the left political violence is a knob, and they can turn the heat up and down, with things like protests, and riots, all the way up to destruction of property, and sometimes murder… But for the vast majority of folks on the right, it’s an off and on switch. And the settings are Vote or Shoot Fucking Everybody. And believe me, you really don’t want that switch to get flipped, because Civil War 2.0 would make Bosnia look like a trip to Disneyworld." - Larry Correia @monsterhunter45
Here are the main reasons why I believe the large flood event described in the Bible occurred 5,000–6,000 years ago:
Sediments showing major flood deposits have been found in ancient Mesopotamian cities such as Ur, Shuruppak, and Kish. There was also a Y-chromosome bottleneck in which 19 out of 20 male lineages went extinct (literally a "Noah's Flood" scenario in which only one male lineage and a few female lineages were passed on). In addition, there was an abrupt climate change event and the desertification of the Sahara, during which the once-green region turned into a vast desert.
All of this happened during the same period, around the time of the 5.9 kiloyear event and the Solovki Geomagnetic Excursion.
This evidence points to the flood traditions preserved in the stories of Noah, Gilgamesh, and Atrahasis from the Levant and Mesopotamia, as well as the Flood of Manu in India and the Greek flood of Deucalion.
@4nt1p4tt3rn If the kids are witting, Zood Location is a solid open-source, E2E encrypted solution that is reasonably private from big data harvesting (Looking at you Life360). Of course you could spin up your own server and tracking software, but that is somewhat involved.
COLLIN COUNTY- In response to Jake Lang’s presence, one Karmelo supporter starts chanting “the only good cracker is a dead cracker”
This is the current scene outside of the Collin county courthouse as the Karmelo Anthony trial continues.
@Savsays | @TPUSA