Men are single because women think having a vagina is enough. No self-work. No effort to understand men.
And that's why they're mad.
If men were marrying just for sex, every prostitute would be a wife by now.
A man can get sex with no wedding, no bills, no responsibility of feeding and housing a woman.
No serious man marries for sex.
He marries for peace. For loyalty. For children. For a home. For a woman he can actually build a life with.
That's why the men who STILL want marriage in this generation aren't looking for a body. Bodies are cheap.
They're looking for character. And most of you don't have it.
I’m not kidding when I say that the Cornell frat guys should file a counter suit accusing the woman of raping them. According to her own testimony, some of the men were drunker than she was. By her logic, and the logic of her supporters, they were even less capable of consent. She was the rapist in that case. There’s no way out of our current madness except by holding feminists to their own standards.
The story of a whore
Seven hours of slutting it up turns to rape later on. She needs to be arrested for false allegations. She needs to take accountability for being a slut.
Holding women accountable for their actions is considered “abuse” by most women.
In case you’re wondering why women are acting like lunatics these days.
Bro lucy craig only sued the 7 fraternity men from cornell because she got embarrassed that everyone at school heard the story, but now the whole world knows and she’s a meme
@darkbratzdoll No you shouldn't, otherwise that would discredit my point. A true sociopath and narcissist wouldn't be offended by that. You're helping me out by not being offended
The Cornell case shows again that the deepest desire of many people in modern culture, especially feminists, is to be released of the burden of their own agency. They want to believe that they are not responsible for anything they do. A perverse unhuman desire, but widely felt.
You can perfectly understand the case of the Cornell 7, and the reaction to it, once you understand that feminists fundamentally reject the idea that women can ever be truly responsible for any wrong doing of any kind. Which is why, when there’s a disgusting drug and alcohol fueled orgy where everyone involved is inebriated, the woman is somehow automatically the victim and the men are somehow automatically responsible. On normal logic, that makes no sense. If alcohol removes consent, then the drunk men have just as valid a claim to being raped as the drunk woman. But feminists aren’t using normal logic. They’re using feminist logic. Which, again, starts with the presupposition that women by definition cannot truly be at fault at all for anything ever. That is simply a brute fact of the universe, in their view. They don’t have to defend it, and don’t, and can’t.