@kelly_steffee It is so difficult when your symptoms are high anxiety over the wellbeing of your kids, knowing that admitting to SIHI will mean your kids are taken. The truth is you are terrified that you will hurt yourself or others, bc you feel out of control.
@SikhFeminist Alot of psychiatrists seemed like this during my postpartum depression and psychosis. In the end it all seemed so subjective. They are not serious enough about the fact that they freaking alter our brain chemistry.
Discovered more people behind the anonymous accounts in this “Protect Erika Kirk” group chat and it’s now getting interesting.
Names of people from the top of “conservative” companies. That is why they are all freaking out.
Stay tuned. About to get VERY interesting.
If you personally know anything please e-mail us at [email protected]
Even if Hamad did completely disarm, Israel would continue to slaughter Palestinians and appropriate land. The US will continue to broker illegal redevelopment deals to line the Trump family's, and their cronies pocket.
In truth the offer is "put up a fight and Palestinians will die or lay down and Palestinians will die."
Charlie Kirk hated this reporter Brandy. So much so that when she contacted me almost immediately after his assassination, I had a visceral reaction—told her to kick rocks, and reminded her how nasty she had been to Charlie and TPUSA.
It is of course, expected that Charlie’s wife didn’t care about that at all and chose to open the doors up, and grant Brandy an interview— despite the nasty articles that Brandy wrote about Charlie which are STILL available on the internet.
I have learned that Erika prefers to grieve with Charlie’s enemies. I’m glad Brandy included my response to her in this trash piece.
Charlie Kirk hated this reporter Brandy. So much so that when she contacted me almost immediately after his assassination, I had a visceral reaction—told her to kick rocks, and reminded her how nasty she had been to Charlie and TPUSA.
It is of course, expected that Charlie’s wife didn’t care about that at all and chose to open the doors up, and grant Brandy an interview— despite the nasty articles that Brandy wrote about Charlie which are STILL available on the internet.
I have learned that Erika prefers to grieve with Charlie’s enemies. I’m glad Brandy included my response to her in this trash piece.
Candace’s claim is that the fed narrative is a lie and so she investigates every possible lead and theory.
Andrew’s (stated) position is that Tyler Robinson did it alone and the evidence is so strong that he’ll wipe the floor with anyone that wants to debate that.
But Andrew’s actual goal seems to be to try to quote farm a bunch of out of context moments from throughout Candace’s year long investigation to try to win word games interrogating her body of work.
Because he’s scared to debate the central point- the feds, TPUSA’s, and his claim that the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler did it all on his own.
It’s even implied that the evidence is so overwhelming that it’s morally wrong for Candace to investigate at all.
Candace is offering Andrew the opportunity of a lifetime right now. But she’s correctly asserting that the first topic of discussion should be the actual evidence in the murder if Charlie Kirk. Not Andrew’s opinion of Candace’s podcast. Though she graciously offered to field all his very important concerns about her show in the second half of the discussion.
The only reason he would be saying no at this point is because he doesn’t want the central point to be about the fed narrative and the overwhelming evidence. Because Andrew doesn’t seem to actually affirmatively believe that.
He’s just interested in trying to mud wrestle with snippets of Candace’s past work.
That’s how it looks to me from out here having watched them go back and forth all day.
It’s amusing. But I hope Andrew actually takes the opportunity. Im sure it’ll make great television.